From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/xehp: Drop GETPARAM lookups of I915_PARAM_[SUB]SLICE_MASK
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 20:20:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220517032005.2694737-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220517032005.2694737-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Slice/subslice/EU information should be obtained via the topology
queries provided by the I915_QUERY interface; let's turn off support for
the old GETPARAM lookups on Xe_HP and beyond where we can't return
meaningful values.
The slice mask lookup is meaningless since Xe_HP doesn't support
traditional slices (and we make no attempt to return the various new
units like gslices, cslices, mslices, etc.) here.
The subslice mask lookup is even more problematic; given the distinct
masks for geometry vs compute purposes, the combined mask returned here
is likely not what userspace would want to act upon anyway. The value
is also limited to 32-bits by the nature of the GETPARAM ioctl which is
sufficient for the initial Xe_HP platforms, but is unable to convey the
larger masks that will be needed on other upcoming platforms. Finally,
the value returned here becomes even less meaningful when used on
multi-tile platforms where each tile will have its own masks.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
index c12a0adefda5..ac9767c56619 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
@@ -148,11 +148,19 @@ int i915_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
value = intel_engines_has_context_isolation(i915);
break;
case I915_PARAM_SLICE_MASK:
+ /* Not supported from Xe_HP onward; use topology queries */
+ if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
value = sseu->slice_mask;
if (!value)
return -ENODEV;
break;
case I915_PARAM_SUBSLICE_MASK:
+ /* Not supported from Xe_HP onward; use topology queries */
+ if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* Only copy bits from the first slice */
memcpy(&value, sseu->subslice_mask,
min(sseu->ss_stride, (u8)sizeof(value)));
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 3:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/6] i915: SSEU handling updates Matt Roper
2022-05-17 3:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/xehp: Use separate sseu init function Matt Roper
2022-05-17 3:20 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2022-05-20 9:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/xehp: Drop GETPARAM lookups of I915_PARAM_[SUB]SLICE_MASK Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-20 20:42 ` Matt Roper
2022-05-24 8:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-01 5:59 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-05-17 3:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/sseu: Simplify gen11+ SSEU handling Matt Roper
2022-05-20 9:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-17 3:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/sseu: Don't try to store EU mask internally in UAPI format Matt Roper
2022-05-20 9:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-17 3:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/sseu: Disassociate internal subslice mask representation from uapi Matt Roper
2022-05-17 15:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2022-05-20 10:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-17 3:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/pvc: Add SSEU changes Matt Roper
2022-05-17 3:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: SSEU handling updates (rev3) Patchwork
2022-05-17 3:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-05-17 4:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-05-17 6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-05-17 18:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: SSEU handling updates (rev4) Patchwork
2022-05-17 18:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-05-17 19:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-05-17 19:19 ` Matt Roper
2022-05-17 20:44 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2022-05-17 20:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-05-18 0:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-05-18 3:24 ` Matt Roper
2022-05-18 16:51 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2022-05-18 15:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220517032005.2694737-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox