From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/edid: Clarify why we only accept the "range limits only" descriptor
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:34:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220826213501.31490-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220826213501.31490-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
The current comment fails to clarify why we only accept
the "range limits only" variant of the range descriptor.
Reword it to make some actual sense.
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index 4005dab6147d..ac662495635c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -6033,10 +6033,13 @@ void get_monitor_range(const struct detailed_timing *timing, void *c)
return;
/*
- * Check for flag range limits only. If flag == 1 then
- * no additional timing information provided.
- * Default GTF, GTF Secondary curve and CVT are not
- * supported
+ * These limits are used to determine the VRR refresh
+ * rate range. Only the "range limits only" variant
+ * of the range descriptor seems to guarantee that
+ * any and all timings are accepted by the sink, as
+ * opposed to just timings conforming to the indicated
+ * formula (GTF/GTF2/CVT). Thus other variants of the
+ * range descriptor are not accepted here.
*/
if (range->flags != DRM_EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG)
return;
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 21:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff Ville Syrjala
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/edid: Handle EDID 1.4 range descriptor h/vfreq offsets Ville Syrjala
2022-08-27 1:40 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-09-02 13:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-08-26 21:34 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2022-08-27 1:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/edid: Clarify why we only accept the "range limits only" descriptor Navare, Manasi
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/edid: s/monitor_rage/vrr_range/ Ville Syrjala
2022-08-27 1:47 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-08-29 8:29 ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/edid: Define more flags Ville Syrjala
2022-08-29 8:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/edid: Only parse VRR range for continuous frequency displays Ville Syrjala
2022-08-29 8:58 ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/edid: Extract drm_gtf2_mode() Ville Syrjala
2022-08-29 8:45 ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/edid: Use GTF2 for inferred modes Ville Syrjala
2022-09-02 12:25 ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 12:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/edid: Use the correct formula for standard timings Ville Syrjala
2022-09-02 13:41 ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 14:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/edid: Unconfuse preferred timing stuff a bit Ville Syrjala
2022-09-02 12:27 ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/edid: Make version checks less convoluted Ville Syrjala
2022-09-02 12:31 ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Infer vrefresh range for eDP if the EDID omits it Ville Syrjala
2022-08-29 8:56 ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-29 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-08-26 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff Patchwork
2022-08-26 23:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-08-29 14:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2022-08-29 15:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-08-30 18:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff Patchwork
2022-08-31 5:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220826213501.31490-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox