public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Navare, Manasi" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/edid: Clarify why we only accept the "range limits only" descriptor
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:45:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220827014517.GA107528@mdnavare-mobl1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220826213501.31490-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:34:52AM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The current comment fails to clarify why we only accept
> the "range limits only" variant of the range descriptor.
> Reword it to make some actual sense.
>

Thanks Ville for adding this description for monitor_range

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

Manasi

> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
> Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
> Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 4005dab6147d..ac662495635c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -6033,10 +6033,13 @@ void get_monitor_range(const struct detailed_timing *timing, void *c)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Check for flag range limits only. If flag == 1 then
> -	 * no additional timing information provided.
> -	 * Default GTF, GTF Secondary curve and CVT are not
> -	 * supported
> +	 * These limits are used to determine the VRR refresh
> +	 * rate range. Only the "range limits only" variant
> +	 * of the range descriptor seems to guarantee that
> +	 * any and all timings are accepted by the sink, as
> +	 * opposed to just timings conforming to the indicated
> +	 * formula (GTF/GTF2/CVT). Thus other variants of the
> +	 * range descriptor are not accepted here.
>  	 */
>  	if (range->flags != DRM_EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG)
>  		return;
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-27  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-26 21:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff Ville Syrjala
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/edid: Handle EDID 1.4 range descriptor h/vfreq offsets Ville Syrjala
2022-08-27  1:40   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-09-02 13:44     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/edid: Clarify why we only accept the "range limits only" descriptor Ville Syrjala
2022-08-27  1:45   ` Navare, Manasi [this message]
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/edid: s/monitor_rage/vrr_range/ Ville Syrjala
2022-08-27  1:47   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-08-29  8:29   ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/edid: Define more flags Ville Syrjala
2022-08-29  8:39   ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/edid: Only parse VRR range for continuous frequency displays Ville Syrjala
2022-08-29  8:58   ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/edid: Extract drm_gtf2_mode() Ville Syrjala
2022-08-29  8:45   ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/edid: Use GTF2 for inferred modes Ville Syrjala
2022-09-02 12:25   ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 12:45     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/edid: Use the correct formula for standard timings Ville Syrjala
2022-09-02 13:41   ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 14:02     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-08-26 21:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/edid: Unconfuse preferred timing stuff a bit Ville Syrjala
2022-09-02 12:27   ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/edid: Make version checks less convoluted Ville Syrjala
2022-09-02 12:31   ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-26 21:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Infer vrefresh range for eDP if the EDID omits it Ville Syrjala
2022-08-29  8:56   ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-29 12:02   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-08-26 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff Patchwork
2022-08-26 23:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-08-29 14:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2022-08-29 15:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-08-30 18:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff Patchwork
2022-08-31  5:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/edid: Range descriptor stuff (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220827014517.GA107528@mdnavare-mobl1.jf.intel.com \
    --to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    --cc=Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com \
    --cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox