public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/slpc: Let's fix the PCODE min freq table setup for SLPC
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:16:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220830191620.45119-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87edwxzqir.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

We need to inform PCODE of a desired ring frequencies so PCODE update
the memory frequencies to us. rps->min_freq and rps->max_freq are the
frequencies used in that request. However they were unset when SLPC was
enabled and PCODE never updated the memory freq.

v2 (as Suggested by Ashutosh): if SLPC is in use, let's pick the right
   frequencies from the get_ia_constants instead of the fake init of
   rps' min and max.

v3: don't forget the max <= min return

v4: Move all the freq conversion to intel_rps.c. And the max <= min
    check to where it belongs.

Fixes: 7ba79a671568 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.15+
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Tested-by: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_llc.c | 19 ++++++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_llc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_llc.c
index 14fe65812e42..1d19c073ba2e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_llc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_llc.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include "intel_llc.h"
 #include "intel_mchbar_regs.h"
 #include "intel_pcode.h"
+#include "intel_rps.h"
 
 struct ia_constants {
 	unsigned int min_gpu_freq;
@@ -55,9 +56,6 @@ static bool get_ia_constants(struct intel_llc *llc,
 	if (!HAS_LLC(i915) || IS_DGFX(i915))
 		return false;
 
-	if (rps->max_freq <= rps->min_freq)
-		return false;
-
 	consts->max_ia_freq = cpu_max_MHz();
 
 	consts->min_ring_freq =
@@ -65,13 +63,8 @@ static bool get_ia_constants(struct intel_llc *llc,
 	/* convert DDR frequency from units of 266.6MHz to bandwidth */
 	consts->min_ring_freq = mult_frac(consts->min_ring_freq, 8, 3);
 
-	consts->min_gpu_freq = rps->min_freq;
-	consts->max_gpu_freq = rps->max_freq;
-	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 9) {
-		/* Convert GT frequency to 50 HZ units */
-		consts->min_gpu_freq /= GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
-		consts->max_gpu_freq /= GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
-	}
+	consts->min_gpu_freq = intel_rps_get_min_raw_freq(rps);
+	consts->max_gpu_freq = intel_rps_get_max_raw_freq(rps);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -130,6 +123,12 @@ static void gen6_update_ring_freq(struct intel_llc *llc)
 	if (!get_ia_constants(llc, &consts))
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * Although this is unlikely on any platform during initialization,
+	 * let's ensure we don't get accidentally into infinite loop
+	 */
+	if (consts.max_gpu_freq <= consts.min_gpu_freq)
+		return;
 	/*
 	 * For each potential GPU frequency, load a ring frequency we'd like
 	 * to use for memory access.  We do this by specifying the IA frequency
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index de794f5f8594..26af974292c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -2156,6 +2156,24 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
 		return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->max_freq_softlimit);
 }
 
+u32 intel_rps_get_max_raw_freq(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+	u32 freq;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(slpc->rp0_freq,
+					 GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER);
+	} else {
+		freq = rps->max_freq;
+		if (GRAPHICS_VER(rps_to_i915(rps)) >= 9) {
+			/* Convert GT frequency to 50 HZ units */
+			freq /= GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
+		}
+		return freq;
+	}
+}
+
 u32 intel_rps_get_rp0_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
@@ -2244,6 +2262,24 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
 		return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->min_freq_softlimit);
 }
 
+u32 intel_rps_get_min_raw_freq(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+	u32 freq;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(slpc->min_freq,
+					 GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER);
+	} else {
+		freq = rps->min_freq;
+		if (GRAPHICS_VER(rps_to_i915(rps)) >= 9) {
+			/* Convert GT frequency to 50 HZ units */
+			freq /= GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
+		}
+		return freq;
+	}
+}
+
 static int set_min_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
index 8fe5a6bbdf66..64e4ef565e52 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
@@ -39,8 +39,10 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_cagf(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 rpstat1);
 u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
 u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
 u32 intel_rps_get_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
+u32 intel_rps_get_min_raw_freq(struct intel_rps *rps);
 int intel_rps_set_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val);
 u32 intel_rps_get_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
+u32 intel_rps_get_max_raw_freq(struct intel_rps *rps);
 int intel_rps_set_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val);
 u32 intel_rps_get_rp0_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
 u32 intel_rps_get_rp1_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
-- 
2.37.2


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-30 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-25 22:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/slpc: Set rps' min and max frequencies even with SLPC Rodrigo Vivi
2022-08-25 22:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-08-25 23:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2022-08-25 23:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-26  9:28   ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2022-08-26 10:13   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/slpc: Fix PCODE IA Freq requests when using SLPC Rodrigo Vivi
2022-08-26 13:13     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-26 17:44       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-08-26 20:03         ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-30 15:42           ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-30 19:16             ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2022-08-31  0:45               ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/slpc: Let's fix the PCODE min freq table setup for SLPC Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-31 19:35                 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2022-08-31 21:45                 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-08-31 22:17                   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-01 16:53                     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-08-26  0:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/slpc: Set rps' min and max frequencies even with SLPC. (rev2) Patchwork
2022-08-26 11:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/slpc: Set rps' min and max frequencies even with SLPC. (rev4) Patchwork
2022-08-26 18:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/slpc: Set rps' min and max frequencies even with SLPC. (rev5) Patchwork
2022-08-30 12:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/slpc: Set rps' min and max frequencies even with SLPC. (rev4) Patchwork
2022-08-30 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/slpc: Set rps' min and max frequencies even with SLPC. (rev6) Patchwork
2022-08-31 15:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-08-31 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/slpc: Set rps' min and max frequencies even with SLPC. (rev7) Patchwork
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220830191620.45119-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox