Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
To: Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Cc: DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Fix a static analysis warning
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:41:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221220024147.4118685-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221220024147.4118685-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

A static analyser was complaining about not checking for null
pointers. However, the location of the complaint can only be reached
in the first place if said pointer is non-null. Basically, if we are
using a v69 GuC then the descriptor pool is guaranteed to be alocated
at start of day or submission will be disabled with an ENOMEM error.
And if we are using a later GuC that does not use a descriptor pool
then the v69 submission function would not be called. So, not a
possible null at that point in the code.

Hence adding a GEM_BUG_ON(!ptr) to keep the tool happy.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index 4682ec1dbd9c0..c93d0594bfd5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -2538,6 +2538,7 @@ static void prepare_context_registration_info_v69(struct intel_context *ce)
 		   i915_gem_object_is_lmem(ce->ring->vma->obj));
 
 	desc = __get_lrc_desc_v69(guc, ctx_id);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!desc);
 	desc->engine_class = engine_class_to_guc_class(engine->class);
 	desc->engine_submit_mask = engine->logical_mask;
 	desc->hw_context_desc = ce->lrc.lrca;
-- 
2.39.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-20  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20  2:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for various UC related issues John.C.Harrison
2022-12-20  2:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Fix missing return code checks in submission init John.C.Harrison
2022-12-20  2:41 ` John.C.Harrison [this message]
2022-12-20  2:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/uc: Fix two issues with over-size firmware files John.C.Harrison
2022-12-20 11:15   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-12-21 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Fixes for various UC related issues Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-12-21 19:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] " John.C.Harrison
2022-12-21 19:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Fix a static analysis warning John.C.Harrison
2022-12-22 12:57   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221220024147.4118685-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    --cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox