From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/12] drm/i915/perf: Handle non-power-of-2 reports
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:00:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230316010101.2590309-9-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230316010101.2590309-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Some of the newer OA formats are not powers of 2. For those formats,
adjust the hw_tail accordingly when checking for new reports.
v2: (Ashutosh)
- Switch to OA_TAKEN for diff calculation
- Use OA_BUFFER_SIZE instead of the vma size
- Update comments
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index 8336430aa27f..9e6da8859284 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static bool oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
bool pollin;
u32 hw_tail;
u64 now;
+ u32 partial_report_size;
/* We have to consider the (unlikely) possibility that read() errors
* could result in an OA buffer reset which might reset the head and
@@ -543,10 +544,15 @@ static bool oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
hw_tail = stream->perf->ops.oa_hw_tail_read(stream);
- /* The tail pointer increases in 64 byte increments,
- * not in report_size steps...
+ /* The tail pointer increases in 64 byte increments, not in report_size
+ * steps. Also the report size may not be a power of 2. Compute
+ * potentially partially landed report in the OA buffer
*/
- hw_tail &= ~(report_size - 1);
+ partial_report_size = OA_TAKEN(hw_tail, stream->oa_buffer.tail);
+ partial_report_size %= report_size;
+
+ /* Subtract partial amount off the tail */
+ hw_tail = gtt_offset + OA_TAKEN(hw_tail, partial_report_size);
now = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
@@ -669,6 +675,8 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
{
int report_size = stream->oa_buffer.format->size;
struct drm_i915_perf_record_header header;
+ int report_size_partial;
+ u8 *oa_buf_end;
header.type = DRM_I915_PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE;
header.pad = 0;
@@ -682,8 +690,20 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
return -EFAULT;
buf += sizeof(header);
- if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size))
+ oa_buf_end = stream->oa_buffer.vaddr + OA_BUFFER_SIZE;
+ report_size_partial = oa_buf_end - report;
+
+ if (report_size_partial < report_size) {
+ if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size_partial))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ buf += report_size_partial;
+
+ if (copy_to_user(buf, stream->oa_buffer.vaddr,
+ report_size - report_size_partial))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ } else if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size)) {
return -EFAULT;
+ }
(*offset) += header.size;
@@ -747,12 +767,11 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
* An out of bounds or misaligned head or tail pointer implies a driver
* bug since we validate + align the tail pointers we read from the
* hardware and we are in full control of the head pointer which should
- * only be incremented by multiples of the report size (notably also
- * all a power of two).
+ * only be incremented by multiples of the report size.
*/
if (drm_WARN_ONCE(&uncore->i915->drm,
- head > OA_BUFFER_SIZE || head % report_size ||
- tail > OA_BUFFER_SIZE || tail % report_size,
+ head > OA_BUFFER_SIZE ||
+ tail > OA_BUFFER_SIZE,
"Inconsistent OA buffer pointers: head = %u, tail = %u\n",
head, tail))
return -EIO;
@@ -766,22 +785,6 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
u32 ctx_id;
u64 reason;
- /*
- * All the report sizes factor neatly into the buffer
- * size so we never expect to see a report split
- * between the beginning and end of the buffer.
- *
- * Given the initial alignment check a misalignment
- * here would imply a driver bug that would result
- * in an overrun.
- */
- if (drm_WARN_ON(&uncore->i915->drm,
- (OA_BUFFER_SIZE - head) < report_size)) {
- drm_err(&uncore->i915->drm,
- "Spurious OA head ptr: non-integral report offset\n");
- break;
- }
-
/*
* The reason field includes flags identifying what
* triggered this specific report (mostly timer
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-16 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-16 1:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 00/12] Add OAM support for MTL Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 01/12] drm/i915/perf: Drop wakeref on GuC RC error Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 02/12] drm/i915/mtl: Synchronize i915/BIOS on C6 enabling Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-17 3:43 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-03-17 5:24 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-03-17 18:26 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 03/12] drm/i915/perf: Add helper to check supported OA engines Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 04/12] drm/i915/perf: Validate OA sseu config outside switch Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 05/12] drm/i915/perf: Group engines into respective OA groups Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 06/12] drm/i915/perf: Fail modprobe if i915_perf_init fails on OOM Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 07/12] drm/i915/perf: Parse 64bit report header formats correctly Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:00 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 09/12] drm/i915/perf: Add engine class instance parameters to perf Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/12] drm/i915/perf: Add support for OA media units Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-16 1:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 11/12] drm/i915/perf: Pass i915 object to perf revision helper Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-17 5:01 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-03-16 1:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 12/12] drm/i915/perf: Wa_14017512683: Disable OAM if media C6 is enabled in BIOS Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-03-17 5:14 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-03-17 6:06 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-03-17 16:24 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230316010101.2590309-9-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox