From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Beef up SDVO/HDMI port checks
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 19:55:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230511165534.10266-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511165534.10266-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
The SDVO code already warns when the port in question doesn't
actually support SDVO. Let's make that also bail the encoder
registration like the generic assert_port_valid() we added.
And add a similar thing for g4x HDMI, mainly because on g4x
itsefl port D only supports DP but not SDVO/HDMI. For the
other platforms the generic port_mask check should actually
be sufficient, but since we're here might as well list the
ports.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_hdmi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_hdmi.c
index 59704939c111..8c71e3ede680 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_hdmi.c
@@ -659,6 +659,20 @@ int g4x_hdmi_connector_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
return ret;
}
+static bool is_hdmi_port_valid(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
+{
+ if (IS_G4X(i915) || IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915))
+ return port == PORT_B || port == PORT_C;
+ else
+ return port == PORT_B || port == PORT_C || port == PORT_D;
+}
+
+static bool assert_hdmi_port_valid(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
+{
+ return !drm_WARN(&i915->drm, !is_hdmi_port_valid(i915, port),
+ "Platform does not support HDMI %c\n", port_name(port));
+}
+
void g4x_hdmi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
i915_reg_t hdmi_reg, enum port port)
{
@@ -670,6 +684,9 @@ void g4x_hdmi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (!assert_port_valid(dev_priv, port))
return;
+ if (!assert_hdmi_port_valid(dev_priv, port))
+ return;
+
devdata = intel_bios_encoder_data_lookup(dev_priv, port);
/* FIXME bail? */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
index 6ed613558cf8..e6b140b073c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
@@ -3314,13 +3314,19 @@ intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo,
return i2c_add_adapter(&sdvo->ddc) == 0;
}
-static void assert_sdvo_port_valid(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- enum port port)
+static bool is_sdvo_port_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
{
if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
- drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, port != PORT_B);
+ return port == PORT_B;
else
- drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, port != PORT_B && port != PORT_C);
+ return port == PORT_B || port == PORT_C;
+}
+
+static bool assert_sdvo_port_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ enum port port)
+{
+ return !drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, !is_sdvo_port_valid(dev_priv, port),
+ "Platform does not support SDVO %c\n", port_name(port));
}
bool intel_sdvo_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
@@ -3333,7 +3339,8 @@ bool intel_sdvo_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (!assert_port_valid(dev_priv, port))
return false;
- assert_sdvo_port_valid(dev_priv, port);
+ if (!assert_sdvo_port_valid(dev_priv, port))
+ return false;
intel_sdvo = kzalloc(sizeof(*intel_sdvo), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!intel_sdvo)
--
2.39.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-11 16:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Remove bogus DDI-F from hsw/bdw output init Ville Syrjala
2023-05-24 15:33 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Introduce device info port_mask Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Assert that device info bitmasks have enough bits Ville Syrjala
2023-05-24 15:48 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-25 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Assert that the port being initialized is valid Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Init DDI outputs based on port_mask on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe Ville Syrjala
2023-05-24 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 21:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask Patchwork
2023-05-11 21:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-05-11 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-05-24 21:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230511165534.10266-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox