From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 17:52:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524145232.7426-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511165534.10266-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Make HSW/BDW use port_mask for output probing as well.
To achieve that the strap checks are moved into
intel_ddi_init() itself. Or should we move them to the
runtime port_mask init instead? Maybe not since the hardware
is still there, just not connected to anything.
v2: Account for DDI-E in strap detection
Keep to the old CRT->DDI init order
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 23 +++-------------
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
index a5ca4b9d1e3e..7d1bab460973 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
@@ -4660,6 +4660,29 @@ static void intel_ddi_encoder_shutdown(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
#define port_tc_name(port) ((port) - PORT_TC1 + '1')
#define tc_port_name(tc_port) ((tc_port) - TC_PORT_1 + '1')
+static bool port_strap_detected(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
+{
+ /* straps not used on skl+ */
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9)
+ return true;
+
+ switch (port) {
+ case PORT_A:
+ return intel_de_read(i915, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
+ case PORT_B:
+ return intel_de_read(i915, SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED;
+ case PORT_C:
+ return intel_de_read(i915, SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED;
+ case PORT_D:
+ return intel_de_read(i915, SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED;
+ case PORT_E:
+ return true; /* no strap for DDI-E */
+ default:
+ MISSING_CASE(port);
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
{
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
@@ -4668,6 +4691,12 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
bool init_hdmi, init_dp;
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, port);
+ if (!port_strap_detected(dev_priv, port)) {
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "Port %c strap not detected\n", port_name(port));
+ return;
+ }
+
if (!assert_port_valid(dev_priv, port))
return;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index fd3b5fc801e6..d9b5a552a2ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -7350,9 +7350,12 @@ void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
return;
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
enum port port;
+ if (intel_ddi_crt_present(dev_priv))
+ intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
+
for_each_port_masked(port, RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->port_mask)
intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, port);
@@ -7363,24 +7366,6 @@ void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
vlv_dsi_init(dev_priv);
- } else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
- u32 found;
-
- if (intel_ddi_crt_present(dev_priv))
- intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
-
- /* Haswell uses DDI functions to detect digital outputs. */
- found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
- if (found)
- intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
-
- found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SFUSE_STRAP);
- if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED)
- intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
- if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED)
- intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
- if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED)
- intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
} else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
int found;
--
2.39.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-11 16:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Remove bogus DDI-F from hsw/bdw output init Ville Syrjala
2023-05-24 15:33 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Introduce device info port_mask Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Assert that device info bitmasks have enough bits Ville Syrjala
2023-05-24 15:48 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-25 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Assert that the port being initialized is valid Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Beef up SDVO/HDMI port checks Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Init DDI outputs based on port_mask on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2023-05-11 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe Ville Syrjala
2023-05-24 14:52 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2023-05-11 21:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask Patchwork
2023-05-11 21:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-05-11 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-05-24 21:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask (rev2) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-31 13:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask Ville Syrjala
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe Ville Syrjala
2023-06-02 14:51 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-08 19:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230524145232.7426-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox