From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 17:51:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bkhxex3s.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531134806.23065-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 31 May 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Make HSW/BDW use port_mask for output probing as well.
> To achieve that the strap checks are moved into
> intel_ddi_init() itself. Or should we move them to the
> runtime port_mask init instead? Maybe not since the hardware
> is still there, just not connected to anything.
>
> v2: Account for DDI-E in strap detection
> Keep to the old CRT->DDI init order
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 23 +++-------------
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 31001b9a29b0..d89a9b85a780 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -4657,6 +4657,29 @@ static void intel_ddi_tc_encoder_shutdown_complete(struct intel_encoder *encoder
> #define port_tc_name(port) ((port) - PORT_TC1 + '1')
> #define tc_port_name(tc_port) ((tc_port) - TC_PORT_1 + '1')
>
> +static bool port_strap_detected(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
> +{
> + /* straps not used on skl+ */
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9)
> + return true;
> +
> + switch (port) {
> + case PORT_A:
> + return intel_de_read(i915, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
> + case PORT_B:
> + return intel_de_read(i915, SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED;
> + case PORT_C:
> + return intel_de_read(i915, SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED;
> + case PORT_D:
> + return intel_de_read(i915, SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED;
> + case PORT_E:
> + return true; /* no strap for DDI-E */
> + default:
> + MISSING_CASE(port);
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
> @@ -4665,6 +4688,12 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
> bool init_hdmi, init_dp;
> enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, port);
>
> + if (!port_strap_detected(dev_priv, port)) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "Port %c strap not detected\n", port_name(port));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (!assert_port_valid(dev_priv, port))
> return;
I might have put this check first before the straps, so we get the
invalid port message for bogus ports instead of MISSING_CASE().
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 12f2e3897595..1ae4854b275e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -7387,9 +7387,12 @@ void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
> return;
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> + if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> enum port port;
>
> + if (intel_ddi_crt_present(dev_priv))
> + intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
> +
> for_each_port_masked(port, DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->port_mask)
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, port);
>
> @@ -7400,24 +7403,6 @@ void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
> vlv_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> - } else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> - u32 found;
> -
> - if (intel_ddi_crt_present(dev_priv))
> - intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
> -
> - /* Haswell uses DDI functions to detect digital outputs. */
> - found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
> - if (found)
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> -
> - found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SFUSE_STRAP);
> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED)
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED)
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED)
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
> int found;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 13:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask Ville Syrjala
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/i915: Remove bogus DDI-F from hsw/bdw output init Ville Syrjala
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: Introduce device info port_mask Ville Syrjala
2023-06-02 14:11 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-08 19:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-06-15 12:02 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: Assert that device info bitmasks have enough bits Ville Syrjala
2023-06-02 14:13 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-02 14:16 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: Assert that the port being initialized is valid Ville Syrjala
2023-06-02 14:19 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915: Beef up SDVO/HDMI port checks Ville Syrjala
2023-06-02 14:23 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915: Init DDI outputs based on port_mask on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2023-06-02 14:41 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-08 19:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-06-09 9:19 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe Ville Syrjala
2023-06-02 14:51 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-06-08 19:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-06-02 10:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Init DDI ports based on port_mask (rev3) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-11 16:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use port_mask for DDI probe Ville Syrjala
2023-05-24 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bkhxex3s.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox