From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop infrastructure for multiple page-track modes
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 17:35:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230513003600.818142-23-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230513003600.818142-1-seanjc@google.com>
Drop "support" for multiple page-track modes, as there is no evidence
that array-based and refcounted metadata is the optimal solution for
other modes, nor is there any evidence that other use cases, e.g. for
access-tracking, will be a good fit for the page-track machinery in
general.
E.g. one potential use case of access-tracking would be to prevent guest
access to poisoned memory (from the guest's perspective). In that case,
the number of poisoned pages is likely to be a very small percentage of
the guest memory, and there is no need to reference count the number of
access-tracking users, i.e. expanding gfn_track[] for a new mode would be
grossly inefficient. And for poisoned memory, host userspace would also
likely want to trap accesses, e.g. to inject #MC into the guest, and that
isn't currently supported by the page-track framework.
A better alternative for that poisoned page use case is likely a
variation of the proposed per-gfn attributes overlay (linked), which
would allow efficiently tracking the sparse set of poisoned pages, and by
default would exit to userspace on access.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y2WB48kD0J4VGynX@google.com
Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 +--
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 11 +--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 14 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c | 111 ++++++++------------------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 4 +-
6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5ce06a75d3de..3dde3a11113a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -288,13 +288,13 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry;
* kvm_mmu_page_role tracks the properties of a shadow page (where shadow page
* also includes TDP pages) to determine whether or not a page can be used in
* the given MMU context. This is a subset of the overall kvm_cpu_role to
- * minimize the size of kvm_memory_slot.arch.gfn_track, i.e. allows allocating
- * 2 bytes per gfn instead of 4 bytes per gfn.
+ * minimize the size of kvm_memory_slot.arch.gfn_write_track, i.e. allows
+ * allocating 2 bytes per gfn instead of 4 bytes per gfn.
*
* Upper-level shadow pages having gptes are tracked for write-protection via
- * gfn_track. As above, gfn_track is a 16 bit counter, so KVM must not create
- * more than 2^16-1 upper-level shadow pages at a single gfn, otherwise
- * gfn_track will overflow and explosions will ensure.
+ * gfn_write_track. As above, gfn_write_track is a 16 bit counter, so KVM must
+ * not create more than 2^16-1 upper-level shadow pages at a single gfn,
+ * otherwise gfn_write_track will overflow and explosions will ensue.
*
* A unique shadow page (SP) for a gfn is created if and only if an existing SP
* cannot be reused. The ability to reuse a SP is tracked by its role, which
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ struct kvm_lpage_info {
struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap[KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES];
struct kvm_lpage_info *lpage_info[KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES - 1];
- unsigned short *gfn_track[KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX];
+ unsigned short *gfn_write_track;
};
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 61adb07b5927..9e4ee26d1779 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -4,17 +4,10 @@
#include <linux/kvm_types.h>
-enum kvm_page_track_mode {
- KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE,
- KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX,
-};
-
void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
- enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
- enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 0d9fe54ecb01..8041f5747704 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -837,8 +837,7 @@ static void account_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
/* the non-leaf shadow pages are keeping readonly. */
if (sp->role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
- return kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn,
- KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ return kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
@@ -884,8 +883,7 @@ static void unaccount_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
if (sp->role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
- return kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn,
- KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ return kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
}
@@ -2825,7 +2823,7 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
* track machinery is used to write-protect upper-level shadow pages,
* i.e. this guards the role.level == 4K assertion below!
*/
- if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE))
+ if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(kvm, slot, gfn))
return -EPERM;
/*
@@ -4226,7 +4224,7 @@ static bool page_fault_handle_page_track(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* guest is writing the page which is write tracked which can
* not be fixed by page fault handler.
*/
- if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE))
+ if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn))
return true;
return false;
@@ -5461,8 +5459,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* physical address properties) in a single VM would require tracking
* all relevant CPUID information in kvm_mmu_page_role. That is very
* undesirable as it would increase the memory requirements for
- * gfn_track (see struct kvm_mmu_page_role comments). For now that
- * problem is swept under the rug; KVM's CPUID API is horrific and
+ * gfn_write_track (see struct kvm_mmu_page_role comments). For now
+ * that problem is swept under the rug; KVM's CPUID API is horrific and
* it's all but impossible to solve it without introducing a new API.
*/
vcpu->arch.root_mmu.root_role.word = 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index b20aad7ac3fe..cdc6069b8caf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -27,76 +27,50 @@ bool kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
{
- int i;
+ kvfree(slot->arch.gfn_write_track);
+ slot->arch.gfn_write_track = NULL;
+}
- for (i = 0; i < KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX; i++) {
- kvfree(slot->arch.gfn_track[i]);
- slot->arch.gfn_track[i] = NULL;
- }
+static int __kvm_page_track_write_tracking_alloc(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ unsigned long npages)
+{
+ const size_t size = sizeof(*slot->arch.gfn_write_track);
+
+ if (!slot->arch.gfn_write_track)
+ slot->arch.gfn_write_track = __vcalloc(npages, size,
+ GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+
+ return slot->arch.gfn_write_track ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
}
int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
unsigned long npages)
{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX; i++) {
- if (i == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE &&
- !kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm))
- continue;
-
- slot->arch.gfn_track[i] =
- __vcalloc(npages, sizeof(*slot->arch.gfn_track[i]),
- GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
- if (!slot->arch.gfn_track[i])
- goto track_free;
- }
-
- return 0;
-
-track_free:
- kvm_page_track_free_memslot(slot);
- return -ENOMEM;
-}
-
-static inline bool page_track_mode_is_valid(enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
-{
- if (mode < 0 || mode >= KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX)
- return false;
-
- return true;
-}
-
-int kvm_page_track_write_tracking_alloc(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
-{
- unsigned short *gfn_track;
-
- if (slot->arch.gfn_track[KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE])
+ if (!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm))
return 0;
- gfn_track = __vcalloc(slot->npages, sizeof(*gfn_track),
- GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
- if (gfn_track == NULL)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return __kvm_page_track_write_tracking_alloc(slot, npages);
+}
- slot->arch.gfn_track[KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE] = gfn_track;
- return 0;
+int kvm_page_track_write_tracking_alloc(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
+{
+ return __kvm_page_track_write_tracking_alloc(slot, slot->npages);
}
-static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
- enum kvm_page_track_mode mode, short count)
+static void update_gfn_write_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+ short count)
{
int index, val;
index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K);
- val = slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index];
+ val = slot->arch.gfn_write_track[index];
if (WARN_ON(val + count < 0 || val + count > USHRT_MAX))
return;
- slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index] += count;
+ slot->arch.gfn_write_track[index] += count;
}
/*
@@ -109,21 +83,15 @@ static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
* @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
* @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
* @gfn: the guest page.
- * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
*/
void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
- enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
{
- if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
+ if (WARN_ON(!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)))
return;
- if (WARN_ON(mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE &&
- !kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)))
- return;
-
- update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, 1);
+ update_gfn_write_track(slot, gfn, 1);
/*
* new track stops large page mapping for the
@@ -131,9 +99,8 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
*/
kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
- if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)
- if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K))
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+ if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K))
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
@@ -148,20 +115,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
* @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
* @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
* @gfn: the guest page.
- * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
*/
void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
- enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
{
- if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
+ if (WARN_ON(!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)))
return;
- if (WARN_ON(mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE &&
- !kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)))
- return;
-
- update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, -1);
+ update_gfn_write_track(slot, gfn, -1);
/*
* allow large page mapping for the tracked page
@@ -176,22 +137,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page);
*/
bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- gfn_t gfn, enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
+ gfn_t gfn)
{
int index;
- if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
- return false;
-
if (!slot)
return false;
- if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE &&
- !kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm))
+ if (!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm))
return false;
index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K);
- return !!READ_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
+ return !!READ_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_write_track[index]);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
index 931b26b8fc8f..789d0c479519 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
unsigned long npages);
bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- gfn_t gfn, enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING
int kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 2e65901270ca..25226e4e3417 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
}
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
@@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_remove(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
}
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
--
2.40.1.606.ga4b1b128d6-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-13 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-13 0:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/28] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/28] drm/i915/gvt: Verify pfn is "valid" before dereferencing "struct page" Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/28] drm/i915/gvt: remove interface intel_gvt_is_valid_gfn Sean Christopherson
2023-05-15 11:07 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/28] drm/i915/gvt: Verify hugepages are contiguous in physical address space Sean Christopherson
2023-05-16 9:37 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-17 14:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-18 9:06 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-18 18:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-19 3:18 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/28] drm/i915/gvt: Put the page reference obtained by KVM's gfn_to_pfn() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/28] drm/i915/gvt: Explicitly check that vGPU is attached before shadowing Sean Christopherson
2023-05-15 11:24 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-05-15 17:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/28] drm/i915/gvt: Error out on an attempt to shadowing an unknown GTT entry type Sean Christopherson
2023-05-15 11:28 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/28] drm/i915/gvt: Don't rely on KVM's gfn_to_pfn() to query possible 2M GTT Sean Christopherson
2023-05-17 0:57 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/28] drm/i915/gvt: Use an "unsigned long" to iterate over memslot gfns Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/28] drm/i915/gvt: Drop unused helper intel_vgpu_reset_gtt() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/28] drm/i915/gvt: Protect gfn hash table with vgpu_lock Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Move kvm_arch_flush_shadow_{all, memslot}() to mmu.c Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't rely on page-track mechanism to flush on memslot change Sean Christopherson
2023-05-17 2:06 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't bounce through page-track mechanism for guest PTEs Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 14/28] KVM: drm/i915/gvt: Drop @vcpu from KVM's ->track_write() hook Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 15/28] KVM: x86: Reject memslot MOVE operations if KVMGT is attached Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/28] drm/i915/gvt: Don't bother removing write-protection on to-be-deleted slot Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 17/28] KVM: x86: Add a new page-track hook to handle memslot deletion Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 18/28] drm/i915/gvt: switch from ->track_flush_slot() to ->track_remove_region() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 19/28] KVM: x86: Remove the unused page-track hook track_flush_slot() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 20/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Move KVM-only page-track declarations to internal header Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use page-track notifiers iff there are external users Sean Christopherson
2023-05-17 3:27 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-13 0:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename page-track APIs to reflect the new reality Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Assert that correct locks are held for page write-tracking Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug the VM if write-tracking is used but not enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 26/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop @slot param from exported/external page-track APIs Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 27/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle KVM bookkeeping in page-track APIs, not callers Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 0:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 28/28] drm/i915/gvt: Drop final dependencies on KVM internal details Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13 1:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups (rev8) Patchwork
2023-05-13 2:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-06-14 3:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/28] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Ma, Yongwei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230513003600.818142-23-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox