public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename page-track APIs to reflect the new reality
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 17:35:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230513003600.818142-24-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230513003600.818142-1-seanjc@google.com>

Rename the page-track APIs to capture that they're all about tracking
writes, now that the facade of supporting multiple modes is gone.

Opportunstically replace "slot" with "gfn" in anticipation of removing
the @slot param from the external APIs.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h |  8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                |  8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c         | 21 +++++++++------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h         |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c      |  4 ++--
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 9e4ee26d1779..f5c1db36cdb7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
 
 #include <linux/kvm_types.h>
 
-void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
-				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
-void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
-				     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
+void kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
+			     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
+void kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+				gfn_t gfn);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 8041f5747704..1818c047891f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static void account_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 
 	/* the non-leaf shadow pages are keeping readonly. */
 	if (sp->role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
-		return kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
+		return kvm_write_track_add_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
 
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void unaccount_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 	slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
 	slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
 	if (sp->role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
-		return kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
+		return kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
 
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 }
@@ -2823,7 +2823,7 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 	 * track machinery is used to write-protect upper-level shadow pages,
 	 * i.e. this guards the role.level == 4K assertion below!
 	 */
-	if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(kvm, slot, gfn))
+	if (kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(kvm, slot, gfn))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	/*
@@ -4224,7 +4224,7 @@ static bool page_fault_handle_page_track(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	 * guest is writing the page which is write tracked which can
 	 * not be fixed by page fault handler.
 	 */
-	if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn))
+	if (kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn))
 		return true;
 
 	return false;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index cdc6069b8caf..b835ba7f325c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -84,10 +84,9 @@ static void update_gfn_write_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
  * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
  * @gfn: the guest page.
  */
-void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
-				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
+void kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+			     gfn_t gfn)
 {
-
 	if (WARN_ON(!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)))
 		return;
 
@@ -102,12 +101,11 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 	if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K))
 		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_add_gfn);
 
 /*
  * remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception
- * of corresponding access on that page. It is the opposed operation of
- * kvm_slot_page_track_add_page().
+ * of corresponding access on that page.
  *
  * It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu
  * or kvm->slots_lock.
@@ -116,8 +114,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
  * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
  * @gfn: the guest page.
  */
-void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
-				     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
+void kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
+				struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
 {
 	if (WARN_ON(!kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)))
 		return;
@@ -130,14 +128,13 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 */
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_track_remove_gfn);
 
 /*
  * check if the corresponding access on the specified guest page is tracked.
  */
-bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm,
-				   const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-				   gfn_t gfn)
+bool kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(struct kvm *kvm,
+			      const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
 {
 	int index;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
index 789d0c479519..50d3278e8c69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.h
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
 				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 				  unsigned long npages);
 
-bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm,
-				   const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
+bool kvm_gfn_is_write_tracked(struct kvm *kvm,
+			      const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXTERNAL_WRITE_TRACKING
 int kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 25226e4e3417..18f04493e103 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
 	}
 
 	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-	kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
+	kvm_write_track_add_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
 	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
 	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
@@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_remove(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
 	}
 
 	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-	kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn);
+	kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(kvm, slot, gfn);
 	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
 
-- 
2.40.1.606.ga4b1b128d6-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-13  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-13  0:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/28] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/28] drm/i915/gvt: Verify pfn is "valid" before dereferencing "struct page" Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/28] drm/i915/gvt: remove interface intel_gvt_is_valid_gfn Sean Christopherson
2023-05-15 11:07   ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/28] drm/i915/gvt: Verify hugepages are contiguous in physical address space Sean Christopherson
2023-05-16  9:37   ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-17 14:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-18  9:06       ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-18 18:04         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-19  3:18           ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/28] drm/i915/gvt: Put the page reference obtained by KVM's gfn_to_pfn() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/28] drm/i915/gvt: Explicitly check that vGPU is attached before shadowing Sean Christopherson
2023-05-15 11:24   ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-05-15 17:57     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/28] drm/i915/gvt: Error out on an attempt to shadowing an unknown GTT entry type Sean Christopherson
2023-05-15 11:28   ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/28] drm/i915/gvt: Don't rely on KVM's gfn_to_pfn() to query possible 2M GTT Sean Christopherson
2023-05-17  0:57   ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/28] drm/i915/gvt: Use an "unsigned long" to iterate over memslot gfns Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/28] drm/i915/gvt: Drop unused helper intel_vgpu_reset_gtt() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/28] drm/i915/gvt: Protect gfn hash table with vgpu_lock Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Move kvm_arch_flush_shadow_{all, memslot}() to mmu.c Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't rely on page-track mechanism to flush on memslot change Sean Christopherson
2023-05-17  2:06   ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't bounce through page-track mechanism for guest PTEs Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 14/28] KVM: drm/i915/gvt: Drop @vcpu from KVM's ->track_write() hook Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 15/28] KVM: x86: Reject memslot MOVE operations if KVMGT is attached Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/28] drm/i915/gvt: Don't bother removing write-protection on to-be-deleted slot Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 17/28] KVM: x86: Add a new page-track hook to handle memslot deletion Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 18/28] drm/i915/gvt: switch from ->track_flush_slot() to ->track_remove_region() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 19/28] KVM: x86: Remove the unused page-track hook track_flush_slot() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 20/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Move KVM-only page-track declarations to internal header Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use page-track notifiers iff there are external users Sean Christopherson
2023-05-17  3:27   ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop infrastructure for multiple page-track modes Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Assert that correct locks are held for page write-tracking Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug the VM if write-tracking is used but not enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 26/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop @slot param from exported/external page-track APIs Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 27/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle KVM bookkeeping in page-track APIs, not callers Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  0:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 28/28] drm/i915/gvt: Drop final dependencies on KVM internal details Sean Christopherson
2023-05-13  1:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups (rev8) Patchwork
2023-05-13  2:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-06-14  3:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/28] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Ma, Yongwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230513003600.818142-24-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox