From: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/dsc: Move rc param calculation for native_420
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 15:42:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230703101244.2489790-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230703101244.2489790-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Move rc_param calculation for native_420 into calculate_rc_parameter.
second_line_bpg_offset and second_line_offset_adj are both rc params
and it would be better to have these calculated where all the other
rc parameters are calculated.
--v2
-Add the reason for commit in commit message [Jani]
--v3
-Move nsl_second_line_bpg_offset with the other 420 calculation
in calculate_rc_param [Ankit]
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 45 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
index bd9116d2cd76..7d0edb440ca6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
@@ -78,6 +78,27 @@ calculate_rc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg)
else
vdsc_cfg->first_line_bpg_offset = 2 * (vdsc_cfg->slice_height - 1);
+ /* According to DSC 1.2 specs in Section 4.1 if native_420 is set:
+ * -second_line_bpg_offset is 12 in general and equal to 2*(slice_height-1) if slice
+ * height < 8.
+ * -second_line_offset_adj is 512 as shown by emperical values to yield best chroma
+ * preservation in second line.
+ * -nsl_bpg_offset is calculated as second_line_offset/slice_height -1 then rounded
+ * up to 16 fractional bits, we left shift second line offset by 11 to preserve 11
+ * fractional bits.
+ */
+ if (vdsc_cfg->native_420) {
+ if (vdsc_cfg->slice_height >= 8)
+ vdsc_cfg->second_line_bpg_offset = 12;
+ else
+ vdsc_cfg->second_line_bpg_offset =
+ 2 * (vdsc_cfg->slice_height - 1);
+
+ vdsc_cfg->second_line_offset_adj = 512;
+ vdsc_cfg->nsl_bpg_offset = DIV_ROUND_UP(vdsc_cfg->second_line_bpg_offset << 11,
+ vdsc_cfg->slice_height - 1);
+ }
+
/* Our hw supports only 444 modes as of today */
if (bpp >= 12)
vdsc_cfg->initial_offset = 2048;
@@ -190,30 +211,12 @@ int intel_dsc_compute_params(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel = compressed_bpp << 4;
/*
- * According to DSC 1.2 specs in Section 4.1 if native_420 is set:
- * -We need to double the current bpp.
- * -second_line_bpg_offset is 12 in general and equal to 2*(slice_height-1) if slice
- * height < 8.
- * -second_line_offset_adj is 512 as shown by emperical values to yeild best chroma
- * preservation in second line.
- * -nsl_bpg_offset is calculated as second_line_offset/slice_height -1 then rounded
- * up to 16 fractional bits, we left shift second line offset by 11 to preserve 11
- * fractional bits.
+ * According to DSC 1.2 specs in Section 4.1 if native_420 is set
+ * we need to double the current bpp.
*/
- if (vdsc_cfg->native_420) {
+ if (vdsc_cfg->native_420)
vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel <<= 1;
- if (vdsc_cfg->slice_height >= 8)
- vdsc_cfg->second_line_bpg_offset = 12;
- else
- vdsc_cfg->second_line_bpg_offset =
- 2 * (vdsc_cfg->slice_height - 1);
-
- vdsc_cfg->second_line_offset_adj = 512;
- vdsc_cfg->nsl_bpg_offset = DIV_ROUND_UP(vdsc_cfg->second_line_bpg_offset << 11,
- vdsc_cfg->slice_height - 1);
- }
-
vdsc_cfg->bits_per_component = pipe_config->pipe_bpp / 3;
drm_dsc_set_rc_buf_thresh(vdsc_cfg);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-03 10:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add rc_range_params for YUV420 Suraj Kandpal
2023-07-03 10:12 ` Suraj Kandpal [this message]
2023-07-04 8:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/dsc: Move rc param calculation for native_420 Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-03 10:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/drm: Fix comment for YUV420 qp table declaration Suraj Kandpal
2023-07-04 8:11 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-03 10:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/dsc: Add rc_range_parameter calculation for YCBCR420 Suraj Kandpal
2023-07-04 13:39 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-03 10:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Add rc_range_params for YUV420 Patchwork
2023-07-03 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-03 12:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230703101244.2489790-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--to=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox