From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Nuke the duplicate sdvo->port
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 23:21:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230705202122.17915-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230705202122.17915-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
We already have encoder->port so get rid of the duplicate
sdvo->port.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
index e6c558416a6b..383f8b1547a1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
@@ -108,8 +108,6 @@ struct intel_sdvo {
*/
u16 hotplug_active;
- enum port port;
-
/* DDC bus used by this SDVO encoder */
u8 ddc_bus;
@@ -226,7 +224,7 @@ static void intel_sdvo_write_sdvox(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u32 val)
return;
}
- if (intel_sdvo->port == PORT_B)
+ if (intel_sdvo->base.port == PORT_B)
cval = intel_de_read(dev_priv, GEN3_SDVOC);
else
bval = intel_de_read(dev_priv, GEN3_SDVOB);
@@ -403,7 +401,7 @@ static const char *sdvo_cmd_name(u8 cmd)
return NULL;
}
-#define SDVO_NAME(svdo) ((svdo)->port == PORT_B ? "SDVOB" : "SDVOC")
+#define SDVO_NAME(svdo) ((svdo)->base.port == PORT_B ? "SDVOB" : "SDVOC")
static void intel_sdvo_debug_write(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd,
const void *args, int args_len)
@@ -1604,7 +1602,7 @@ static void intel_sdvo_pre_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
sdvox |= SDVO_BORDER_ENABLE;
} else {
sdvox = intel_de_read(dev_priv, intel_sdvo->sdvo_reg);
- if (intel_sdvo->port == PORT_B)
+ if (intel_sdvo->base.port == PORT_B)
sdvox &= SDVOB_PRESERVE_MASK;
else
sdvox &= SDVOC_PRESERVE_MASK;
@@ -2618,7 +2616,7 @@ intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(sdvo->base.base.dev);
struct sdvo_device_mapping *mapping;
- if (sdvo->port == PORT_B)
+ if (sdvo->base.port == PORT_B)
mapping = &dev_priv->display.vbt.sdvo_mappings[0];
else
mapping = &dev_priv->display.vbt.sdvo_mappings[1];
@@ -2636,7 +2634,7 @@ intel_sdvo_select_i2c_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
struct sdvo_device_mapping *mapping;
u8 pin;
- if (sdvo->port == PORT_B)
+ if (sdvo->base.port == PORT_B)
mapping = &dev_priv->display.vbt.sdvo_mappings[0];
else
mapping = &dev_priv->display.vbt.sdvo_mappings[1];
@@ -2676,7 +2674,7 @@ intel_sdvo_get_slave_addr(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(sdvo->base.base.dev);
struct sdvo_device_mapping *my_mapping, *other_mapping;
- if (sdvo->port == PORT_B) {
+ if (sdvo->base.port == PORT_B) {
my_mapping = &dev_priv->display.vbt.sdvo_mappings[0];
other_mapping = &dev_priv->display.vbt.sdvo_mappings[1];
} else {
@@ -2703,7 +2701,7 @@ intel_sdvo_get_slave_addr(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
* No SDVO device info is found for another DVO port,
* so use mapping assumption we had before BIOS parsing.
*/
- if (sdvo->port == PORT_B)
+ if (sdvo->base.port == PORT_B)
return 0x70;
else
return 0x72;
@@ -3367,7 +3365,6 @@ bool intel_sdvo_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
"SDVO %c", port_name(port));
intel_sdvo->sdvo_reg = sdvo_reg;
- intel_sdvo->port = port;
intel_sdvo->slave_addr = intel_sdvo_get_slave_addr(intel_sdvo) >> 1;
intel_sdvo_select_i2c_bus(intel_sdvo);
if (!intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(intel_sdvo))
@@ -3417,7 +3414,7 @@ bool intel_sdvo_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
* hotplug lines.
*/
if (intel_sdvo->hotplug_active) {
- if (intel_sdvo->port == PORT_B)
+ if (intel_sdvo->base.port == PORT_B)
intel_encoder->hpd_pin = HPD_SDVO_B;
else
intel_encoder->hpd_pin = HPD_SDVO_C;
--
2.39.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-05 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 20:21 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915/sdvo: DDC rework and fixes Ville Syrjala
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Issue SetTargetOutput prior ot GetAttachedDisplays Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 7:20 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Protect macro args Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 7:20 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915/sdvo: s/sdvo_inputs_mask/sdvo_num_inputs/ Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 7:24 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Don't warn about zero N/P in *_calc_dpll_params() Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:17 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Fully populate crtc_state->dpll Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:41 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Pick the TV dotclock from adjusted_mode Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:22 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Fail gracefully if the TV dotclock is out of range Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:22 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Nuke attached_output tracking Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:24 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Initialize the encoder ealier Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:28 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2023-07-06 8:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Nuke the duplicate sdvo->port Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Get rid of the per-connector i2c symlink Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:30 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Rework DDC bus handling Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Print out the i2c pin and slave address Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 21:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/sdvo: DDC rework and fixes Patchwork
2023-07-05 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-06 1:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-07-06 8:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230705202122.17915-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox