From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Initialize the encoder ealier
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 11:28:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qhlzbom.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230705202122.17915-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 05 Jul 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Call drm_encoder_init() earlier so that we don't have to keep passing
> the i915/dev_priv around separately.
*earlier in the subject.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 35 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> index 29762716a067..e6c558416a6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> @@ -2613,9 +2613,9 @@ intel_sdvo_guess_ddc_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> * outputs, then LVDS outputs.
> */
> static void
> -intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> +intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(sdvo->base.base.dev);
> struct sdvo_device_mapping *mapping;
>
> if (sdvo->port == PORT_B)
> @@ -2630,9 +2630,9 @@ intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> static void
> -intel_sdvo_select_i2c_bus(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> +intel_sdvo_select_i2c_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(sdvo->base.base.dev);
> struct sdvo_device_mapping *mapping;
> u8 pin;
>
> @@ -2671,9 +2671,9 @@ intel_sdvo_is_hdmi_connector(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo)
> }
>
> static u8
> -intel_sdvo_get_slave_addr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> +intel_sdvo_get_slave_addr(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(sdvo->base.base.dev);
> struct sdvo_device_mapping *my_mapping, *other_mapping;
>
> if (sdvo->port == PORT_B) {
> @@ -2994,7 +2994,6 @@ intel_sdvo_output_setup(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo)
> SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0,
> SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1,
> };
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev);
> u16 flags;
> int i;
>
> @@ -3008,7 +3007,7 @@ intel_sdvo_output_setup(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo)
>
> intel_sdvo->controlled_output = flags;
>
> - intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus(i915, intel_sdvo);
> + intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus(intel_sdvo);
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(probe_order); i++) {
> u16 type = flags & probe_order[i];
> @@ -3309,9 +3308,9 @@ static const struct i2c_lock_operations proxy_lock_ops = {
> };
>
> static bool
> -intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo,
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(sdvo->base.base.dev);
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev_priv->drm.dev);
>
> sdvo->ddc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> @@ -3357,23 +3356,23 @@ bool intel_sdvo_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> if (!intel_sdvo)
> return false;
>
> - intel_sdvo->sdvo_reg = sdvo_reg;
> - intel_sdvo->port = port;
> - intel_sdvo->slave_addr =
> - intel_sdvo_get_slave_addr(dev_priv, intel_sdvo) >> 1;
> - intel_sdvo_select_i2c_bus(dev_priv, intel_sdvo);
> - if (!intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(intel_sdvo, dev_priv))
> - goto err_i2c_bus;
> -
> /* encoder type will be decided later */
> intel_encoder = &intel_sdvo->base;
> intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_SDVO;
> intel_encoder->power_domain = POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_OTHER;
> intel_encoder->port = port;
> +
> drm_encoder_init(&dev_priv->drm, &intel_encoder->base,
> &intel_sdvo_enc_funcs, 0,
> "SDVO %c", port_name(port));
>
> + intel_sdvo->sdvo_reg = sdvo_reg;
> + intel_sdvo->port = port;
> + intel_sdvo->slave_addr = intel_sdvo_get_slave_addr(intel_sdvo) >> 1;
> + intel_sdvo_select_i2c_bus(intel_sdvo);
> + if (!intel_sdvo_init_ddc_proxy(intel_sdvo))
> + goto err_i2c_bus;
drm_encoder_cleanup() in the error path?
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> +
> /* Read the regs to test if we can talk to the device */
> for (i = 0; i < 0x40; i++) {
> u8 byte;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-06 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 20:21 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915/sdvo: DDC rework and fixes Ville Syrjala
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Issue SetTargetOutput prior ot GetAttachedDisplays Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 7:20 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Protect macro args Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 7:20 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915/sdvo: s/sdvo_inputs_mask/sdvo_num_inputs/ Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 7:24 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Don't warn about zero N/P in *_calc_dpll_params() Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:17 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Fully populate crtc_state->dpll Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:41 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Pick the TV dotclock from adjusted_mode Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:22 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Fail gracefully if the TV dotclock is out of range Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:22 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Nuke attached_output tracking Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:24 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Initialize the encoder ealier Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:28 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Nuke the duplicate sdvo->port Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:29 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Get rid of the per-connector i2c symlink Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:30 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Rework DDC bus handling Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915/sdvo: Print out the i2c pin and slave address Ville Syrjala
2023-07-06 8:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-05 21:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/sdvo: DDC rework and fixes Patchwork
2023-07-05 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-06 1:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-07-06 8:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qhlzbom.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox