* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code
@ 2023-07-19 13:28 Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/tc: rename mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask() Luca Coelho
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Luca Coelho @ 2023-07-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Hi,
Here are four patches with some clean-ups in the code that handles the
max lane count of Type-C connections.
This is done mostly in preparation for a new way to read the pin
assignments and lane count in future devices.
Please review.
Cheers,
Luca.
Luca Coelho (4):
drm/i915/tc: rename mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask()
drm/i915/tc: make intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask() static
drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func
drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count()
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h | 3 +--
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/tc: rename mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask()
2023-07-19 13:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Luca Coelho
@ 2023-07-19 13:28 ` Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/tc: make intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask() static Luca Coelho
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Luca Coelho @ 2023-07-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
This function doesn't really return the pin assigment mask, but the
max lane count derived from that. So rename the function to
mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count() to better reflect what it really does.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
index 3ebf41859043..71bbc2b16a0e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ u32 intel_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
DP_PIN_ASSIGNMENT_SHIFT(tc->phy_fia_idx);
}
-static int mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+static int mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
assert_tc_cold_blocked(tc);
if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
- return mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask(dig_port);
+ return mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
lane_mask = 0;
with_intel_display_power(i915, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE, wakeref)
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/tc: make intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask() static
2023-07-19 13:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/tc: rename mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask() Luca Coelho
@ 2023-07-19 13:28 ` Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func Luca Coelho
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Luca Coelho @ 2023-07-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
This function is only used locally, so make it static and remove the
definition from the header file.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
index 71bbc2b16a0e..de848b329f4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ assert_tc_port_power_enabled(struct intel_tc_port *tc)
!intel_display_power_is_enabled(i915, tc_port_power_domain(tc)));
}
-u32 intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+static u32 intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
struct intel_tc_port *tc = to_tc_port(dig_port);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
index 3b16491925fa..ffc0e2a74e43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ bool intel_tc_port_in_legacy_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
bool intel_tc_port_connected(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
bool intel_tc_port_connected_locked(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
-u32 intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
u32 intel_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
void intel_tc_port_set_fia_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func
2023-07-19 13:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/tc: rename mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask() Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/tc: make intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask() static Luca Coelho
@ 2023-07-19 13:28 ` Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 15:05 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count() Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Patchwork
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Luca Coelho @ 2023-07-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
This makes the code a bit more symmetric and readable, especially when
we start adding more display version-specific alternatives.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
index de848b329f4b..11b6139eaf4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
@@ -311,13 +311,13 @@ static int mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
}
}
-int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+static int intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
struct intel_tc_port *tc = to_tc_port(dig_port);
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, dig_port->base.port);
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
- u32 lane_mask;
+ u32 lane_mask = 0;
if (!intel_phy_is_tc(i915, phy) || tc->mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
return 4;
@@ -327,7 +327,6 @@ int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
return mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
- lane_mask = 0;
with_intel_display_power(i915, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE, wakeref)
lane_mask = intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(dig_port);
@@ -348,6 +347,19 @@ int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
}
}
+int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
+
+ if (dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
+ return 4;
+
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
+ return mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
+
+ return intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
+}
+
void intel_tc_port_set_fia_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
int required_lanes)
{
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count()
2023-07-19 13:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Luca Coelho
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func Luca Coelho
@ 2023-07-19 13:28 ` Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 15:48 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-19 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Patchwork
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Luca Coelho @ 2023-07-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
It is irrelevant for the caller that the max lane count is being
derived from a FIA register, so having "fia" in the function name is
irrelevant. Rename the function accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 03675620e3ea..b974af839acb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -306,13 +306,13 @@ static int intel_dp_max_common_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
int source_max = intel_dp_max_source_lane_count(dig_port);
int sink_max = intel_dp->max_sink_lane_count;
- int fia_max = intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(dig_port);
+ int port_max = intel_tc_port_max_lane_count(dig_port);
int lttpr_max = drm_dp_lttpr_max_lane_count(intel_dp->lttpr_common_caps);
if (lttpr_max)
sink_max = min(sink_max, lttpr_max);
- return min3(source_max, sink_max, fia_max);
+ return min3(source_max, sink_max, port_max);
}
int intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
index 11b6139eaf4f..61de3dfb89bd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
}
}
-int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+int intel_tc_port_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static bool tc_phy_verify_legacy_or_dp_alt_mode(struct intel_tc_port *tc,
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = tc->dig_port;
int max_lanes;
- max_lanes = intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(dig_port);
+ max_lanes = intel_tc_port_max_lane_count(dig_port);
if (tc->mode == TC_PORT_LEGACY) {
drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, max_lanes != 4);
return true;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
index ffc0e2a74e43..80a61e52850e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ bool intel_tc_port_connected(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
bool intel_tc_port_connected_locked(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
u32 intel_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
-int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
+int intel_tc_port_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
void intel_tc_port_set_fia_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
int required_lanes);
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func Luca Coelho
@ 2023-07-19 15:05 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-07-19 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luca Coelho, intel-gfx; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all
Hi Luca,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Luca-Coelho/drm-i915-tc-rename-mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask/20230719-213204
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719132822.305612-4-luciano.coelho%40intel.com
patch subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func
config: x86_64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230719/202307192225.QnmiapXD-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230719/202307192225.QnmiapXD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307192225.QnmiapXD-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c: In function 'intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c:354:21: error: 'struct intel_digital_port' has no member named 'tc_mode'
354 | if (dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
| ^~
vim +354 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
349
350 int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
351 {
352 struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
353
> 354 if (dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
355 return 4;
356
357 if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
358 return mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
359
360 return intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
361 }
362
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count()
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count() Luca Coelho
@ 2023-07-19 15:48 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-07-19 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luca Coelho, intel-gfx; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all
Hi Luca,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Luca-Coelho/drm-i915-tc-rename-mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask/20230719-213204
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230719132822.305612-5-luciano.coelho%40intel.com
patch subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count()
config: x86_64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230719/202307192336.hHukzc8N-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230719/202307192336.hHukzc8N-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307192336.hHukzc8N-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c: In function 'intel_cx0_phy_lane_reset':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c:2537:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count'; did you mean 'intel_tc_port_max_lane_count'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2537 | bool both_lanes = intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(enc_to_dig_port(encoder)) > 2;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| intel_tc_port_max_lane_count
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +2537 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2530
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2531 static void intel_cx0_phy_lane_reset(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2532 struct intel_encoder *encoder,
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2533 bool lane_reversal)
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2534 {
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2535 enum port port = encoder->port;
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2536 enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, port);
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 @2537 bool both_lanes = intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(enc_to_dig_port(encoder)) > 2;
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2538 u8 lane_mask = lane_reversal ? INTEL_CX0_LANE1 :
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2539 INTEL_CX0_LANE0;
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2540 u32 lane_pipe_reset = both_lanes ?
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2541 XELPDP_LANE_PIPE_RESET(0) |
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2542 XELPDP_LANE_PIPE_RESET(1) :
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2543 XELPDP_LANE_PIPE_RESET(0);
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2544 u32 lane_phy_current_status = both_lanes ?
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2545 XELPDP_LANE_PHY_CURRENT_STATUS(0) |
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2546 XELPDP_LANE_PHY_CURRENT_STATUS(1) :
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2547 XELPDP_LANE_PHY_CURRENT_STATUS(0);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2548
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2549 if (__intel_de_wait_for_register(i915, XELPDP_PORT_BUF_CTL1(port),
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2550 XELPDP_PORT_BUF_SOC_PHY_READY,
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2551 XELPDP_PORT_BUF_SOC_PHY_READY,
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2552 XELPDP_PORT_BUF_SOC_READY_TIMEOUT_US, 0, NULL))
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2553 drm_warn(&i915->drm, "PHY %c failed to bring out of SOC reset after %dus.\n",
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2554 phy_name(phy), XELPDP_PORT_BUF_SOC_READY_TIMEOUT_US);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2555
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2556 intel_de_rmw(i915, XELPDP_PORT_BUF_CTL2(port),
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2557 XELPDP_LANE_PIPE_RESET(0) | XELPDP_LANE_PIPE_RESET(1),
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2558 lane_pipe_reset);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2559
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2560 if (__intel_de_wait_for_register(i915, XELPDP_PORT_BUF_CTL2(port),
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2561 lane_phy_current_status, lane_phy_current_status,
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2562 XELPDP_PORT_RESET_START_TIMEOUT_US, 0, NULL))
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2563 drm_warn(&i915->drm, "PHY %c failed to bring out of Lane reset after %dus.\n",
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2564 phy_name(phy), XELPDP_PORT_RESET_START_TIMEOUT_US);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2565
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2566 intel_de_rmw(i915, XELPDP_PORT_CLOCK_CTL(port),
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2567 intel_cx0_get_pclk_refclk_request(both_lanes ?
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2568 INTEL_CX0_BOTH_LANES :
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2569 INTEL_CX0_LANE0),
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2570 intel_cx0_get_pclk_refclk_request(lane_mask));
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2571
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2572 if (__intel_de_wait_for_register(i915, XELPDP_PORT_CLOCK_CTL(port),
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2573 intel_cx0_get_pclk_refclk_ack(both_lanes ?
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2574 INTEL_CX0_BOTH_LANES :
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2575 INTEL_CX0_LANE0),
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2576 intel_cx0_get_pclk_refclk_ack(lane_mask),
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2577 XELPDP_REFCLK_ENABLE_TIMEOUT_US, 0, NULL))
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2578 drm_warn(&i915->drm, "PHY %c failed to request refclk after %dus.\n",
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2579 phy_name(phy), XELPDP_REFCLK_ENABLE_TIMEOUT_US);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2580
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2581 intel_cx0_powerdown_change_sequence(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_BOTH_LANES,
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2582 CX0_P2_STATE_RESET);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2583 intel_cx0_setup_powerdown(i915, port);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2584
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2585 intel_de_rmw(i915, XELPDP_PORT_BUF_CTL2(port), lane_pipe_reset, 0);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2586
619a06dba6fa38 Mika Kahola 2023-06-01 2587 if (intel_de_wait_for_clear(i915, XELPDP_PORT_BUF_CTL2(port), lane_phy_current_status,
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2588 XELPDP_PORT_RESET_END_TIMEOUT))
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2589 drm_warn(&i915->drm, "PHY %c failed to bring out of Lane reset after %dms.\n",
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2590 phy_name(phy), XELPDP_PORT_RESET_END_TIMEOUT);
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2591 }
51390cc0e00a37 Radhakrishna Sripada 2023-04-13 2592
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code
2023-07-19 13:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Luca Coelho
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count() Luca Coelho
@ 2023-07-19 16:28 ` Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-07-19 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luca Coelho; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/120980/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Error: make failed
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
DESCEND objtool
INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c: In function ‘intel_tc_port_max_lane_count’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c:354:14: error: ‘struct intel_digital_port’ has no member named ‘tc_mode’
354 | if (dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
| ^~
make[6]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:477: drivers/gpu/drm/i915] Error 2
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:477: drivers/gpu/drm] Error 2
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:477: drivers/gpu] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:477: drivers] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/home/kbuild/kernel/Makefile:2020: .] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:234: __sub-make] Error 2
Build failed, no error log produced
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-19 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-19 13:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/tc: rename mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask() Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/tc: make intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask() static Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 15:05 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-19 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count() Luca Coelho
2023-07-19 15:48 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-19 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox