From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Matt Roper" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 1/8] drm/i915: Skip clflush after GPU writes on Meteorlake
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:54:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230727145504.1919316-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727145504.1919316-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
On Meteorlake CPU cache will not contain stale data after GPU access since
write-invalidate protocol is used, which means there is no need to flush
before potentially transitioning the buffer to a non-coherent domain.
Use the opportunity to documet the situation on discrete too.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
index ffddec1d2a76..57db9c581bf6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
@@ -24,9 +24,22 @@ static bool gpu_write_needs_clflush(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
+ /*
+ * Discrete GPUs never dirty the CPU cache.
+ */
if (IS_DGFX(i915))
return false;
+ /*
+ * Cache snooping on Meteorlake is using write-invalidate so GPU writes
+ * never end up in the CPU cache.
+ *
+ * QQQ: Do other snooping platforms behave identicaly and could we
+ * therefore write this as "if !HAS_LLC(i915) && HAS_SNOOP(i915)"?
+ */
+ if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915))
+ return false;
+
/*
* For objects created by userspace through GEM_CREATE with pat_index
* set by set_pat extension, i915_gem_object_has_cache_level() will
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 14:54 [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/8] Another take on PAT/object cache mode refactoring Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 14:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-07-27 22:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 1/8] drm/i915: Skip clflush after GPU writes on Meteorlake Matt Roper
2023-07-28 5:50 ` Yang, Fei
2023-07-27 14:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/8] drm/i915: Split PTE encode between Gen12 and Meteorlake Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 22:25 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-28 8:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-28 14:41 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-27 14:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/8] drm/i915: Cache PAT index used by the driver Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 22:44 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-28 12:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 14:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Refactor PAT/object cache handling Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 23:57 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-28 0:17 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-28 12:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-28 12:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-28 12:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-28 14:53 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-28 7:14 ` Yang, Fei
2023-07-28 12:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 14:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 5/8] drm/i915: Improve the vm_fault_gtt user PAT index restriction Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-28 0:04 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-28 12:28 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 14:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 6/8] drm/i915: Lift the user PAT restriction from gpu_write_needs_clflush Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-28 0:05 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-27 14:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 7/8] drm/i915: Lift the user PAT restriction from use_cpu_reloc Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-28 0:09 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-28 12:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 14:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 8/8] drm/i915: Refine the caching check in i915_gem_object_can_bypass_llc Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-27 19:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Another take on PAT/object cache mode refactoring Patchwork
2023-07-27 19:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-07-27 20:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-28 1:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230727145504.1919316-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox