From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>, matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:02:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231019170241.2102037-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231019163913.2097183-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
The steering control and semaphore registers are inside an "always on"
power domain with respect to RC6. However there are some issues if
higher-level platform sleep states are entering/exiting at the same time
these registers are accessed. Grabbing GT forcewake and holding it over
the entire lock/steer/unlock cycle ensures that those sleep states have
been fully exited before we access these registers.
This is expected to become a formally documented/numbered workaround
soon.
Note that this patch alone isn't expected to have an immediately
noticeable impact on MCR (mis)behavior; an upcoming pcode firmware
update will also be necessary to provide the other half of this
workaround.
v2:
- Move the forcewake inside the Xe_LPG-specific IP version check. This
should only be necessary on platforms that have a steering semaphore.
Fixes: 4186e2185b4f ("drm/i915/gt: Add dedicated MCR lock")
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
index 326c2ed1d99b..34913912d8ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
@@ -376,9 +376,26 @@ void intel_gt_mcr_lock(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned long *flags)
* driver threads, but also with hardware/firmware agents. A dedicated
* locking register is used.
*/
- if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70))
+ if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70)) {
+ /*
+ * The steering control and semaphore registers are inside an
+ * "always on" power domain with respect to RC6. However there
+ * are some issues if higher-level platform sleep states are
+ * entering/exiting at the same time these registers are
+ * accessed. Grabbing GT forcewake and holding it over the
+ * entire lock/steer/unlock cycle ensures that those sleep
+ * states have been fully exited before we access these
+ * registers. This wakeref will be released in the unlock
+ * routine.
+ *
+ * This is expected to become a formally documented/numbered
+ * workaround soon.
+ */
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_get(gt->uncore, FORCEWAKE_GT);
+
err = wait_for(intel_uncore_read_fw(gt->uncore,
MTL_STEER_SEMAPHORE) == 0x1, 100);
+ }
/*
* Even on platforms with a hardware lock, we'll continue to grab
@@ -415,8 +432,11 @@ void intel_gt_mcr_unlock(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned long flags)
{
spin_unlock_irqrestore(>->mcr_lock, flags);
- if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70))
+ if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70)) {
intel_uncore_write_fw(gt->uncore, MTL_STEER_SEMAPHORE, 0x1);
+
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_put(gt->uncore, FORCEWAKE_GT);
+ }
}
/**
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-19 16:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations Matt Roper
2023-10-19 17:02 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2023-10-20 21:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Sripada, Radhakrishna
2023-10-20 22:02 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2023-10-24 12:02 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-24 15:21 ` Matt Roper
2023-10-24 15:29 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-24 8:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Nirmoy Das
2023-10-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations (rev2) Patchwork
2023-10-24 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-10-24 19:57 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231019170241.2102037-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox