Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:26:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcc28a1e-2cfd-fbb3-5b48-5228c69dfd57@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231019163913.2097183-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>


On 10/19/2023 6:39 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> The steering control and semaphore registers are inside an "always on"
> power domain with respect to RC6.  However there are some issues if
> higher-level platform sleep states are entering/exiting at the same time
> these registers are accessed.  Grabbing GT forcewake and holding it over
> the entire lock/steer/unlock cycle ensures that those sleep states have
> been fully exited before we access these registers.
>
> This is expected to become a formally documented/numbered workaround
> soon.
>
> Note that this patch alone isn't expected to have an immediately
> noticeable impact on MCR (mis)behavior; an upcoming pcode firmware
> update will also be necessary to provide the other half of this
> workaround.
>
> Fixes: 4186e2185b4f ("drm/i915/gt: Add dedicated MCR lock")
> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> index 326c2ed1d99b..83bb0575b426 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,21 @@ void intel_gt_mcr_lock(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned long *flags)
>   
>   	lockdep_assert_not_held(&gt->uncore->lock);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * The steering control and semaphore registers are inside an
> +	 * "always on" power domain with respect to RC6.  However there are
> +	 * some issues if higher-level platform sleep states are
> +	 * entering/exiting at the same time these registers are accessed.
> +	 * Grabbing GT forcewake and holding it over the entire
> +	 * lock/steer/unlock cycle ensures that those sleep states have been
> +	 * fully exited before we access these registers.  This
> +	 * wakeref will be released in the unlock routine.
> +	 *
> +	 * This is expected to become a formally documented/numbered workaround
> +	 * soon.
> +	 */
> +	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(gt->uncore, FORCEWAKE_GT);
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Starting with MTL, we need to coordinate not only with other
>   	 * driver threads, but also with hardware/firmware agents.  A dedicated
> @@ -417,6 +432,8 @@ void intel_gt_mcr_unlock(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned long flags)
>   
>   	if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70))
>   		intel_uncore_write_fw(gt->uncore, MTL_STEER_SEMAPHORE, 0x1);
> +
> +	intel_uncore_forcewake_put(gt->uncore, FORCEWAKE_GT);
>   }
>   
>   /**

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-24  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-19 16:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations Matt Roper
2023-10-19 17:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Matt Roper
2023-10-20 21:32   ` Sripada, Radhakrishna
2023-10-20 22:02     ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2023-10-24 12:02   ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-24 15:21     ` Matt Roper
2023-10-24 15:29       ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-24  8:26 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2023-10-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations (rev2) Patchwork
2023-10-24 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-10-24 19:57   ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fcc28a1e-2cfd-fbb3-5b48-5228c69dfd57@linux.intel.com \
    --to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox