From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:26:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcc28a1e-2cfd-fbb3-5b48-5228c69dfd57@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231019163913.2097183-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On 10/19/2023 6:39 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> The steering control and semaphore registers are inside an "always on"
> power domain with respect to RC6. However there are some issues if
> higher-level platform sleep states are entering/exiting at the same time
> these registers are accessed. Grabbing GT forcewake and holding it over
> the entire lock/steer/unlock cycle ensures that those sleep states have
> been fully exited before we access these registers.
>
> This is expected to become a formally documented/numbered workaround
> soon.
>
> Note that this patch alone isn't expected to have an immediately
> noticeable impact on MCR (mis)behavior; an upcoming pcode firmware
> update will also be necessary to provide the other half of this
> workaround.
>
> Fixes: 4186e2185b4f ("drm/i915/gt: Add dedicated MCR lock")
> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> index 326c2ed1d99b..83bb0575b426 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,21 @@ void intel_gt_mcr_lock(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned long *flags)
>
> lockdep_assert_not_held(>->uncore->lock);
>
> + /*
> + * The steering control and semaphore registers are inside an
> + * "always on" power domain with respect to RC6. However there are
> + * some issues if higher-level platform sleep states are
> + * entering/exiting at the same time these registers are accessed.
> + * Grabbing GT forcewake and holding it over the entire
> + * lock/steer/unlock cycle ensures that those sleep states have been
> + * fully exited before we access these registers. This
> + * wakeref will be released in the unlock routine.
> + *
> + * This is expected to become a formally documented/numbered workaround
> + * soon.
> + */
> + intel_uncore_forcewake_get(gt->uncore, FORCEWAKE_GT);
> +
> /*
> * Starting with MTL, we need to coordinate not only with other
> * driver threads, but also with hardware/firmware agents. A dedicated
> @@ -417,6 +432,8 @@ void intel_gt_mcr_unlock(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned long flags)
>
> if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70))
> intel_uncore_write_fw(gt->uncore, MTL_STEER_SEMAPHORE, 0x1);
> +
> + intel_uncore_forcewake_put(gt->uncore, FORCEWAKE_GT);
> }
>
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-19 16:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations Matt Roper
2023-10-19 17:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Matt Roper
2023-10-20 21:32 ` Sripada, Radhakrishna
2023-10-20 22:02 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2023-10-24 12:02 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-24 15:21 ` Matt Roper
2023-10-24 15:29 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-24 8:26 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2023-10-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/mcr: Hold GT forcewake during steering operations (rev2) Patchwork
2023-10-24 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-10-24 19:57 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcc28a1e-2cfd-fbb3-5b48-5228c69dfd57@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox