From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: improve idle/busy handling
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 08:44:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202312160809.nvmiBwrJ-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231213144222.1871-3-christian.koenig@amd.com>
Hi Christian,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-misc/drm-misc-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.7-rc5 next-20231215]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-K-nig/drm-ttm-replace-busy-placement-with-flags-v3/20231213-224456
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213144222.1871-3-christian.koenig%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: improve idle/busy handling
config: x86_64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312160809.nvmiBwrJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312160809.nvmiBwrJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312160809.nvmiBwrJ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> scripts/kernel-doc: drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c:301: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'busy' not described in 'ttm_resource_compatible'
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-16 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 14:42 [PATCH 1/4] drm/ttm: return ENOSPC from ttm_bo_mem_space Christian König
2023-12-13 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3 Christian König
2023-12-13 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: improve idle/busy handling Christian König
2023-12-14 8:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-16 0:44 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-12-13 14:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT Christian König
2023-12-13 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/ttm: return ENOSPC from ttm_bo_mem_space Christian König
2023-12-13 21:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] " Patchwork
2023-12-13 21:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-12-13 21:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-12-13 22:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202312160809.nvmiBwrJ-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox