From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maarten@mblankhorst.nl, Lankhorst@mblankhorst.nl,
dev@lankhorst.se
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:38:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241106143837.195642-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106143837.195642-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Instead of 3 different calls, it should be safe to unify to a single
call now. This makes the init sequence cleaner, and display less
tangled.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241105121857.17389-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst,,, <dev@lankhorst.se>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 72 +++++++------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h | 8 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 10 +---
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index 695c27ac6b0f8..88dcec57620dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@ -100,31 +100,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
}
-static void xe_display_fini_nommio(struct drm_device *dev, void *dummy)
-{
- struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
-
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return;
-
- intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
-}
-
-int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return 0;
-
- /* Fake uncore lock */
- spin_lock_init(&xe->uncore.lock);
-
- /* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
- intel_detect_pch(xe);
-
- return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_display_fini_nommio, xe);
-}
-
-static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
+static void xe_display_fini_early(void *arg)
{
struct xe_device *xe = arg;
struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
@@ -132,11 +108,13 @@ static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
if (!xe->info.probe_display)
return;
+ intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(xe);
intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
+ intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
}
-int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
+int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
{
struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
int err;
@@ -144,6 +122,12 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
if (!xe->info.probe_display)
return 0;
+ /* Fake uncore lock */
+ spin_lock_init(&xe->uncore.lock);
+
+ /* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
+ intel_detect_pch(xe);
+
intel_display_driver_early_probe(xe);
/* Early display init.. */
@@ -160,36 +144,20 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(xe);
err = intel_display_driver_probe_noirq(xe);
- if (err) {
- intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
- return err;
- }
-
- return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noirq, xe);
-}
-
-static void xe_display_fini_noaccel(void *arg)
-{
- struct xe_device *xe = arg;
-
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return;
-
- intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(xe);
-}
-
-int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
- int err;
-
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return 0;
+ if (err)
+ goto err_opregion;
err = intel_display_driver_probe_nogem(xe);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto err_noirq;
- return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noaccel, xe);
+ return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_early, xe);
+err_noirq:
+ intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
+ intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
+err_opregion:
+ intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
+ return err;
}
int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
index 17afa537aee50..255cffa328160 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe);
int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe);
+int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
@@ -53,9 +51,7 @@ static inline int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
+static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index f6f127788bb8b..450c57dfd297b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -641,10 +641,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
return err;
xe->info.mem_region_mask = 1;
- err = xe_display_init_nommio(xe);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
err = xe_set_dma_info(xe);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -696,10 +692,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
if (err)
return err;
- err = xe_display_init_noirq(xe);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
if (err)
goto err;
@@ -727,7 +719,7 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
* This is the reason the first allocation needs to be done
* inside display.
*/
- err = xe_display_init_noaccel(xe);
+ err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
if (err)
goto err;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-06 14:38 [PATCH 01/10] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 14:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 14:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/xe: Move suballocator init to after display init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 14:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/xe: Defer irq init until after xe_display_init_noaccel Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 14:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2024-11-06 14:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/xe/sriov: Move VF bootstrap and query_config to vf_guc_init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 14:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/xe: Simplify GuC early initialisation Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 14:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/xe: Make it possible to read instance0 MCR registers after xe_gt_mcr_init_early Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 14:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/xe: Split init of xe_gt_init_hwconfig to xe_gt_init and *_early Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 14:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] fixup! drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-06 17:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [01/10] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241106143837.195642-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Lankhorst@mblankhorst.nl \
--cc=Maarten@mblankhorst.nl \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox