From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, suraj.kandpal@intel.com,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/dp: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:07:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241120103802.134295-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241120103802.134295-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
With DSC there are additional limits for pipe_bpp. Currently these are
scattered in different places.
Instead set the limits->pipe.max/min_bpp in one place and use them
wherever required.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 49 ++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 0af58ddbe69a..b6d5e8eb75f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -2197,21 +2197,11 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(struct intel_display *display)
}
static
-bool is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
- struct link_config_limits *limits,
+bool is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(struct link_config_limits *limits,
int pipe_bpp)
{
- struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(&i915->drm);
- int dsc_max_bpc, dsc_min_bpc, dsc_max_pipe_bpp, dsc_min_pipe_bpp;
-
- dsc_max_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc(display);
- dsc_min_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(display);
-
- dsc_max_pipe_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpc * 3, limits->pipe.max_bpp);
- dsc_min_pipe_bpp = max(dsc_min_bpc * 3, limits->pipe.min_bpp);
-
- return pipe_bpp >= dsc_min_pipe_bpp &&
- pipe_bpp <= dsc_max_pipe_bpp;
+ return pipe_bpp >= limits->pipe.min_bpp &&
+ pipe_bpp <= limits->pipe.max_bpp;
}
static
@@ -2226,7 +2216,7 @@ int intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
forced_bpp = intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc * 3;
- if (is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, limits, forced_bpp)) {
+ if (is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(limits, forced_bpp)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Input DSC BPC forced to %d\n", intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc);
return forced_bpp;
}
@@ -2243,11 +2233,10 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct link_config_limits *limits,
int timeslots)
{
- struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
const struct intel_connector *connector =
to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
- int dsc_max_bpc, dsc_max_bpp;
- int dsc_min_bpc, dsc_min_bpp;
+ int dsc_max_bpp;
+ int dsc_min_bpp;
u8 dsc_bpc[3] = {};
int forced_bpp, pipe_bpp;
int num_bpc, i, ret;
@@ -2263,14 +2252,8 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
}
}
- dsc_max_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc(display);
- if (!dsc_max_bpc)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpc * 3, limits->pipe.max_bpp);
-
- dsc_min_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(display);
- dsc_min_bpp = max(dsc_min_bpc * 3, limits->pipe.min_bpp);
+ dsc_max_bpp = limits->pipe.max_bpp;
+ dsc_min_bpp = limits->pipe.min_bpp;
/*
* Get the maximum DSC bpc that will be supported by any valid
@@ -2315,7 +2298,7 @@ static int intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
/* For eDP use max bpp that can be supported with DSC. */
pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, max_bpc);
- if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, limits, pipe_bpp)) {
+ if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(limits, pipe_bpp)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"Computed BPC is not in DSC BPC limits\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2529,6 +2512,18 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
return true;
}
+static void
+intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+ struct link_config_limits *limits)
+{
+ struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
+ int dsc_min_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(display);
+ int dsc_max_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc(display);
+
+ limits->pipe.max_bpp = min(limits->pipe.max_bpp, dsc_max_bpc * 3);
+ limits->pipe.min_bpp = max(limits->pipe.min_bpp, dsc_min_bpc * 3);
+}
+
static bool
intel_dp_compute_config_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
@@ -2549,6 +2544,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
limits->pipe.min_bpp = intel_dp_min_bpp(crtc_state->output_format);
limits->pipe.max_bpp = intel_dp_max_bpp(intel_dp, crtc_state,
respect_downstream_limits);
+ if (dsc)
+ intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp_limits(intel_dp, limits);
if (intel_dp->use_max_params) {
/*
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 10:37 [PATCH 00/12] DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/dp: Refactor FEC support check in intel_dp_supports_dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-28 12:46 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/dp: Return early if DSC not supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27 5:43 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-03 8:32 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-03 8:35 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/dp: Separate out helper for compute fec_enable Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 11:52 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-20 12:37 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-11-20 12:51 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27 5:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-28 10:35 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/dp: Return int from dsc_max/min_src_input_bpc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use helpers to get dsc min/max input bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/dp: Drop max_requested_bpc for dsc pipe_min/max bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc for mst Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27 5:51 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/dp: Use clamp for pipe_bpp limits with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/dp: Make dsc helpers accept const crtc_state pointers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27 5:56 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/dp: Set the DSC link limits intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 11:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes (rev9) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241120103802.134295-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox