From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Deak, Imre" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 16:05:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31cb0937-9d32-458d-b677-bf6d971b45e9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB675042B4919A1FF3AA643F14E3282@SN7PR11MB6750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 11/27/2024 11:15 AM, Kandpal, Suraj wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nautiyal, Ankit K <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 4:08 PM
>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>;
>> jani.nikula@linux.intel.com; Deak, Imre <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for
>> intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc
>>
>> DSC support is already checked before the helper
>> intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc is called.
>> Remove the check from the helper.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index d82e25d0dc5a..dd60ca532ae3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ static
>> u8 intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(struct drm_i915_private *i915) {
>> /* Min DSC Input BPC for ICL+ is 8 */
>> - return HAS_DSC(i915) ? 8 : 0;
>> + return 8;
> With this change we don't really need to pass drm_i915_private to this function how about we make it a void function
> This also helps us move away from intel_display
Yeah I agree we dont need to pass drm_i915_private. Will fix this.
Regards,
Ankit
>
> Regards,
> Suraj Kandpal
>
>> }
>>
>> static
>> --
>> 2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 10:37 [PATCH 00/12] DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/dp: Refactor FEC support check in intel_dp_supports_dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-28 12:46 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/dp: Return early if DSC not supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27 5:43 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-03 8:32 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-03 8:35 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/dp: Separate out helper for compute fec_enable Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 11:52 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-20 12:37 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-11-20 12:51 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27 5:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-28 10:35 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/dp: Return int from dsc_max/min_src_input_bpc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use helpers to get dsc min/max input bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/dp: Drop max_requested_bpc for dsc pipe_min/max bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/dp: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc for mst Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27 5:51 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/dp: Use clamp for pipe_bpp limits with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/dp: Make dsc helpers accept const crtc_state pointers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27 5:56 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/dp: Set the DSC link limits intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 11:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes (rev9) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31cb0937-9d32-458d-b677-bf6d971b45e9@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox