Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com,
	Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:48:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260130081812.32087-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260130081812.32087-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Refactor the logic to get the number of joined pipes. Start with a single
pipe and incrementally try additional pipes only if needed. While DSC
overhead is not yet computed here, this restructuring prepares the code to
support that in follow-up changes.

v2:
 - Remove fallback in case force-joiner configuration fails. (Imre)
 - Drop redundant MODE_OK assignment (Imre)
v3:
 - Align with the changes in intel_dp_mode_valid(). (Imre)

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c     |  2 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h     |  3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 86 ++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 85e84f7748d3..2a31543ce4d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -1371,7 +1371,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid_downstream(struct intel_connector *connector,
 	return MODE_OK;
 }
 
-static
 int intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(struct intel_display *display)
 {
 	return DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30 ? 6144 : 5120;
@@ -1434,7 +1433,6 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static
 bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
 		       int num_joined_pipes)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
index 25bfbfd291b0..6d409c1998c9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
@@ -225,5 +225,8 @@ int intel_dp_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 				 struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
 int intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 			       bool assume_all_enabled);
+int intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(struct intel_display *display);
+bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
+		       int num_joined_pipes);
 
 #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index fc9367cc42ec..6414fc8fb4a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -1420,7 +1420,6 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = &intel_dp->mst.mgr;
 	struct drm_dp_mst_port *port = connector->mst.port;
 	const int min_bpp = 18;
-	int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
 	int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock;
 	unsigned long bw_overhead_flags =
 		DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_MST | DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_SSC_REF_CLK;
@@ -1480,47 +1479,60 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	num_joined_pipes = intel_dp_num_joined_pipes(intel_dp, connector,
-						     mode->hdisplay, target_clock);
+	*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
+	for (num_joined_pipes = 1; num_joined_pipes <= I915_MAX_PIPES; num_joined_pipes++) {
+		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
 
-	if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector) && drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(connector->dp.fec_capability)) {
-		/*
-		 * TBD pass the connector BPC,
-		 * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
-		 */
-		int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, U8_MAX);
+		if (connector->force_joined_pipes &&
+		    num_joined_pipes != connector->force_joined_pipes)
+			continue;
 
-		if (!drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(max_link_clock))
-			bw_overhead_flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC;
+		if (!intel_dp_can_join(display, num_joined_pipes))
+			continue;
 
-		dsc = intel_dp_mode_valid_with_dsc(connector,
-						   max_link_clock, max_lanes,
-						   target_clock, mode->hdisplay,
-						   num_joined_pipes,
-						   INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB, pipe_bpp,
-						   bw_overhead_flags);
+		if (mode->hdisplay > num_joined_pipes * intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(display))
+			continue;
+
+		if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector) &&
+		    drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(connector->dp.fec_capability)) {
+			/*
+			 * TBD pass the connector BPC,
+			 * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
+			 */
+			int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, U8_MAX);
+
+			if (!drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(max_link_clock))
+				bw_overhead_flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC;
+
+			dsc = intel_dp_mode_valid_with_dsc(connector,
+							   max_link_clock, max_lanes,
+							   target_clock, mode->hdisplay,
+							   num_joined_pipes,
+							   INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB, pipe_bpp,
+							   bw_overhead_flags);
+		}
+
+		if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(display, num_joined_pipes) && !dsc)
+			continue;
+
+		if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc)
+			continue;
+
+		*status = intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(display, mode, num_joined_pipes);
+
+		if (*status != MODE_OK)
+			continue;
+
+		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
+
+		if (mode->clock > max_dotclk) {
+			*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		break;
 	}
 
-	if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(display, num_joined_pipes) && !dsc) {
-		*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc) {
-		*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	*status = intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(display, mode, num_joined_pipes);
-
-	if (*status != MODE_OK)
-		return 0;
-
-	max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
-
-	if (mode->clock > max_dotclk)
-		*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-30  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-30  8:17 [PATCH 00/17] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:17 ` [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:17 ` [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:17 ` [PATCH 03/17] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:17 ` [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02  8:40   ` Imre Deak
2026-02-02  9:24     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-02  9:27       ` Imre Deak
2026-02-02  9:29         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 05/17] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2026-02-02  8:50   ` [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Imre Deak
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 09/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915/dp: Remove unused joiner helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 12/17] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 15/17] drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for joiner candidate loops Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02  8:51   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  9:41 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev6) Patchwork
2026-01-30 17:45 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-02 10:37 [PATCH 00/17] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260130081812.32087-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox