From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com,
Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:48:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260130081812.32087-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260130081812.32087-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Refactor the logic to get the number of joined pipes. Start with a single
pipe and incrementally try additional pipes only if needed. While DSC
overhead is not yet computed here, this restructuring prepares the code to
support that in follow-up changes.
v2:
- Remove fallback in case force-joiner configuration fails. (Imre)
- Drop redundant MODE_OK assignment (Imre)
v3:
- Align with the changes in intel_dp_mode_valid(). (Imre)
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 -
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 86 ++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 85e84f7748d3..2a31543ce4d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -1371,7 +1371,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid_downstream(struct intel_connector *connector,
return MODE_OK;
}
-static
int intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(struct intel_display *display)
{
return DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30 ? 6144 : 5120;
@@ -1434,7 +1433,6 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
return true;
}
-static
bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
int num_joined_pipes)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
index 25bfbfd291b0..6d409c1998c9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
@@ -225,5 +225,8 @@ int intel_dp_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
int intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
bool assume_all_enabled);
+int intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(struct intel_display *display);
+bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
+ int num_joined_pipes);
#endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index fc9367cc42ec..6414fc8fb4a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -1420,7 +1420,6 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = &intel_dp->mst.mgr;
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port = connector->mst.port;
const int min_bpp = 18;
- int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock;
unsigned long bw_overhead_flags =
DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_MST | DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_SSC_REF_CLK;
@@ -1480,47 +1479,60 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
return 0;
}
- num_joined_pipes = intel_dp_num_joined_pipes(intel_dp, connector,
- mode->hdisplay, target_clock);
+ *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
+ for (num_joined_pipes = 1; num_joined_pipes <= I915_MAX_PIPES; num_joined_pipes++) {
+ int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
- if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector) && drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(connector->dp.fec_capability)) {
- /*
- * TBD pass the connector BPC,
- * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
- */
- int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, U8_MAX);
+ if (connector->force_joined_pipes &&
+ num_joined_pipes != connector->force_joined_pipes)
+ continue;
- if (!drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(max_link_clock))
- bw_overhead_flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC;
+ if (!intel_dp_can_join(display, num_joined_pipes))
+ continue;
- dsc = intel_dp_mode_valid_with_dsc(connector,
- max_link_clock, max_lanes,
- target_clock, mode->hdisplay,
- num_joined_pipes,
- INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB, pipe_bpp,
- bw_overhead_flags);
+ if (mode->hdisplay > num_joined_pipes * intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(display))
+ continue;
+
+ if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector) &&
+ drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(connector->dp.fec_capability)) {
+ /*
+ * TBD pass the connector BPC,
+ * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
+ */
+ int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, U8_MAX);
+
+ if (!drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(max_link_clock))
+ bw_overhead_flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC;
+
+ dsc = intel_dp_mode_valid_with_dsc(connector,
+ max_link_clock, max_lanes,
+ target_clock, mode->hdisplay,
+ num_joined_pipes,
+ INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB, pipe_bpp,
+ bw_overhead_flags);
+ }
+
+ if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(display, num_joined_pipes) && !dsc)
+ continue;
+
+ if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc)
+ continue;
+
+ *status = intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(display, mode, num_joined_pipes);
+
+ if (*status != MODE_OK)
+ continue;
+
+ max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
+
+ if (mode->clock > max_dotclk) {
+ *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ break;
}
- if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(display, num_joined_pipes) && !dsc) {
- *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
- return 0;
- }
-
- if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc) {
- *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
- return 0;
- }
-
- *status = intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(display, mode, num_joined_pipes);
-
- if (*status != MODE_OK)
- return 0;
-
- max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
-
- if (mode->clock > max_dotclk)
- *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
-
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-30 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-30 8:17 [PATCH 00/17] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:17 ` [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:17 ` [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:17 ` [PATCH 03/17] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:17 ` [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 8:40 ` Imre Deak
2026-02-02 9:24 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-02 9:27 ` Imre Deak
2026-02-02 9:29 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 05/17] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2026-02-02 8:50 ` [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Imre Deak
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 09/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915/dp: Remove unused joiner helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 12/17] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 15/17] drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for joiner candidate loops Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 8:51 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 8:18 ` [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30 9:41 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev6) Patchwork
2026-01-30 17:45 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-02 10:37 [PATCH 00/17] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260130081812.32087-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox