Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com,
	Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2026 16:07:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202103731.357416-15-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202103731.357416-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Account for DSC slice overhead bubbles and adjust the pixel rate while
checking the pixel rate against the max dotclock limits.

v2: Add missing assignment for dsc_slice_count in
mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(). (Imre)

v3: Explicitly pass dsc_slice_count as 0 for Non-DSC case. (Imre)

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c     | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h     |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c   |  1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h   |  3 +++
 5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index ee7414206cc5..6329004f56bc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -1414,6 +1414,8 @@ bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
 
 bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
 			   int target_clock,
+			   int htotal,
+			   int dsc_slice_count,
 			   int num_joined_pipes)
 {
 	int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
@@ -1421,6 +1423,12 @@ bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
 
 	effective_dotclk_limit = max_dotclk * num_joined_pipes;
 
+	if (dsc_slice_count)
+		target_clock = intel_dsc_get_pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(display,
+									 target_clock,
+									 htotal,
+									 dsc_slice_count);
+
 	return target_clock <= effective_dotclk_limit;
 }
 
@@ -1553,8 +1561,13 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 		if (status != MODE_OK)
 			continue;
 
+		if (!dsc)
+			dsc_slice_count = 0;
+
 		if (!intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
 					   target_clock,
+					   mode->htotal,
+					   dsc_slice_count,
 					   num_joined_pipes)) {
 			status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
 			continue;
@@ -2816,6 +2829,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 		if (ret ||
 		    !intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
 					   adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
+					   adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal,
+					   0,
 					   num_joined_pipes))
 			dsc_needed = true;
 	}
@@ -2826,6 +2841,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	}
 
 	if (dsc_needed) {
+		int dsc_slice_count;
+
 		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
 			    "Try DSC (fallback=%s, joiner=%s, force=%s)\n",
 			    str_yes_no(ret), str_yes_no(joiner_needs_dsc),
@@ -2842,8 +2859,12 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 
+		dsc_slice_count = intel_dsc_line_slice_count(&pipe_config->dsc.slice_config);
+
 		if (!intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
 					   adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
+					   adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal,
+					   dsc_slice_count,
 					   num_joined_pipes))
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
index edeb09372d1e..95a38763a367 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
@@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
 		       int num_joined_pipes);
 bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
 			   int target_clock,
+			   int htotal,
+			   int dsc_slice_count,
 			   int num_joined_pipes);
 
 #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index 83fe389ea2dc..8bd3128add0e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -626,6 +626,8 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encode
 		if (ret ||
 		    !intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
 					   adjusted_mode->clock,
+					   adjusted_mode->htotal,
+					   0,
 					   num_joined_pipes))
 			dsc_needed = true;
 	}
@@ -637,6 +639,8 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encode
 
 	/* enable compression if the mode doesn't fit available BW */
 	if (dsc_needed) {
+		int dsc_slice_count;
+
 		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Try DSC (fallback=%s, joiner=%s, force=%s)\n",
 			    str_yes_no(ret), str_yes_no(joiner_needs_dsc),
 			    str_yes_no(intel_dp->force_dsc_en));
@@ -670,8 +674,12 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encode
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
+		dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_mst_dsc_get_slice_count(connector, pipe_config);
+
 		if (!intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
 					   adjusted_mode->clock,
+					   adjusted_mode->htotal,
+					   dsc_slice_count,
 					   num_joined_pipes))
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1528,6 +1536,8 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 
 	*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
 	for (num_joined_pipes = 1; num_joined_pipes <= I915_MAX_PIPES; num_joined_pipes++) {
+		int dsc_slice_count = 0;
+
 		if (connector->force_joined_pipes &&
 		    num_joined_pipes != connector->force_joined_pipes)
 			continue;
@@ -1546,6 +1556,11 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 			 */
 			int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, U8_MAX);
 
+			dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
+								       mode->clock,
+								       mode->hdisplay,
+								       num_joined_pipes);
+
 			if (!drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(max_link_clock))
 				bw_overhead_flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC;
 
@@ -1572,8 +1587,13 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 		if (*status != MODE_OK)
 			continue;
 
+		if (!dsc)
+			dsc_slice_count = 0;
+
 		if (!intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
 					   mode->clock,
+					   mode->htotal,
+					   dsc_slice_count,
 					   num_joined_pipes)) {
 			*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
 			continue;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
index 642a89270d8e..7e53201b3cb1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
@@ -1104,7 +1104,6 @@ void intel_vdsc_state_dump(struct drm_printer *p, int indent,
 	drm_dsc_dump_config(p, indent, &crtc_state->dsc.config);
 }
 
-static
 int intel_dsc_get_pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(struct intel_display *display,
 					      int pixel_rate, int htotal,
 					      int dsc_horizontal_slices)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
index aeb17670307b..f4d5b37293cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
@@ -41,5 +41,8 @@ void intel_vdsc_state_dump(struct drm_printer *p, int indent,
 			   const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
 int intel_vdsc_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
 unsigned int intel_vdsc_prefill_lines(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
+int intel_dsc_get_pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(struct intel_display *display,
+					      int pixel_rate, int htotal,
+					      int dsc_horizontal_slices);
 
 #endif /* __INTEL_VDSC_H__ */
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-02 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-02 10:37 [PATCH 00/17] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 03/17] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 05/17] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 09/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915/dp: Remove unused joiner helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 12/17] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 15/17] drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for joiner candidate loops Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 20:56 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev7) Patchwork
2026-02-03  2:34 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-02-03  8:03 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-30  8:17 [PATCH 00/17] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260202103731.357416-15-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox