public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Cc: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	lkp@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1 15/16] drm/i915/bios: search for VBT #57 by default
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 19:11:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417171104.GB426937@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2df6f595-da57-0668-951c-657c5c876333@intel.com>

Hi Michał, all,

> Hi Petr & Oliver,

> > in our tests, it's quite persistent and clean on parent:

> I haven't reproduced it myself, but this issue seems somewhat related
> with issue observed earlier by CI [1]. I would expect it to not be a
> random glitch but a true bug related to the series.

> In previous versions of the series, during parsing there was a
> unfortunate snippet of:

> +	const u32 *tables = block->tables;
> +	size_t offset = 0;
> +	size_t row_width;
> +	const u32 *vals;
> +
> +	row_width = block->num_columns * sizeof(*tables);
> +
> +	for (int idx = 0; idx < block->num_tables; idx++) {
> +		for (int row = 0; row < num_rows; row++) {
> +			vals = &tables[offset];
> [...]
> +			offset += row_width;
> +		}
> +	}

> Which caused hopping by 4 times more bytes than it should, because the
> sizeof() wasn't meant to be there. Since parsing takes place at module
> load, looks like it could be the issue. This seems especially convincing
> given that report is from parse_vswing_preemph_snps(). I have to also
> admit that it would be consistent with review comment from Sashiko [2].

> Lastly, sadly due to poorly split commits, 15th patch from v1 turned on
> whole VBT #57 searching. This probably caused bisect to point at 15th
> patch instead of pointing at patch adding parsing code, which would
> clearly show that patch/es introduce/s the bug.

> Anyways, now the bug should be fixed in v2 [3].

Michał, thanks a lot for pointing pointing this out.

Kind regards,
Petr

> [1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_164196v1/fi-hsw-4770/dmesg0.txt
> [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260331183332.1773886-1-michal.grzelak%40intel.com?part=5
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20260415234639.3577774-21-michal.grzelak@intel.com/

> BR,
> Michał

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-17 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 18:33 [PATCH v1 00/16] VS/PE Override support Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 01/16] drm/i915/lt: align xe3plpd with VS/PE Override layout Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 02/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: switch from u8 to u32 Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 03/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: describe VS/PE Override layout Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/16] drm/i915/bios: prepare for parsing VBT #57 Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 05/16] drm/i915/bios: parse LT's VS/PE Override Block #57 Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 06/16] drm/i915/bios: parse Snps's " Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 07/16] drm/i915/bios: parse EHL's " Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 08/16] drm/i915/bios: support VS/PE Override per each ddi port Michał Grzelak
2026-04-03  8:39   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 09/16] drm/i915/bios: print VS/PE Override port info Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 10/16] drm/i915/ddi: cache VS/PE struct pointer into intel_encoder Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 11/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: override encoder->get_buf_trans when asked Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 12/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: compute LT's VS/PE Override index Michał Grzelak
2026-04-01  7:16   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 13/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: compute Snps's " Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 14/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: compute EHL's " Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 15/16] drm/i915/bios: search for VBT #57 by default Michał Grzelak
2026-04-15  6:42   ` kernel test robot
2026-04-16  6:40     ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2026-04-16  7:40       ` Oliver Sang
2026-04-16  9:17         ` Michał Grzelak
2026-04-17 17:11           ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 16/16] drm/i915/bios: remove VS/PE Override warning Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 19:47 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for VS/PE Override support Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260417171104.GB426937@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=michal.grzelak@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox