From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Cc: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
lkp@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1 15/16] drm/i915/bios: search for VBT #57 by default
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 19:11:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417171104.GB426937@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2df6f595-da57-0668-951c-657c5c876333@intel.com>
Hi Michał, all,
> Hi Petr & Oliver,
> > in our tests, it's quite persistent and clean on parent:
> I haven't reproduced it myself, but this issue seems somewhat related
> with issue observed earlier by CI [1]. I would expect it to not be a
> random glitch but a true bug related to the series.
> In previous versions of the series, during parsing there was a
> unfortunate snippet of:
> + const u32 *tables = block->tables;
> + size_t offset = 0;
> + size_t row_width;
> + const u32 *vals;
> +
> + row_width = block->num_columns * sizeof(*tables);
> +
> + for (int idx = 0; idx < block->num_tables; idx++) {
> + for (int row = 0; row < num_rows; row++) {
> + vals = &tables[offset];
> [...]
> + offset += row_width;
> + }
> + }
> Which caused hopping by 4 times more bytes than it should, because the
> sizeof() wasn't meant to be there. Since parsing takes place at module
> load, looks like it could be the issue. This seems especially convincing
> given that report is from parse_vswing_preemph_snps(). I have to also
> admit that it would be consistent with review comment from Sashiko [2].
> Lastly, sadly due to poorly split commits, 15th patch from v1 turned on
> whole VBT #57 searching. This probably caused bisect to point at 15th
> patch instead of pointing at patch adding parsing code, which would
> clearly show that patch/es introduce/s the bug.
> Anyways, now the bug should be fixed in v2 [3].
Michał, thanks a lot for pointing pointing this out.
Kind regards,
Petr
> [1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_164196v1/fi-hsw-4770/dmesg0.txt
> [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260331183332.1773886-1-michal.grzelak%40intel.com?part=5
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20260415234639.3577774-21-michal.grzelak@intel.com/
> BR,
> Michał
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 18:33 [PATCH v1 00/16] VS/PE Override support Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 01/16] drm/i915/lt: align xe3plpd with VS/PE Override layout Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 02/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: switch from u8 to u32 Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 03/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: describe VS/PE Override layout Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/16] drm/i915/bios: prepare for parsing VBT #57 Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 05/16] drm/i915/bios: parse LT's VS/PE Override Block #57 Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 06/16] drm/i915/bios: parse Snps's " Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 07/16] drm/i915/bios: parse EHL's " Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 08/16] drm/i915/bios: support VS/PE Override per each ddi port Michał Grzelak
2026-04-03 8:39 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 09/16] drm/i915/bios: print VS/PE Override port info Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 10/16] drm/i915/ddi: cache VS/PE struct pointer into intel_encoder Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 11/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: override encoder->get_buf_trans when asked Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 12/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: compute LT's VS/PE Override index Michał Grzelak
2026-04-01 7:16 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 13/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: compute Snps's " Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 14/16] drm/i915/buf_trans: compute EHL's " Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 15/16] drm/i915/bios: search for VBT #57 by default Michał Grzelak
2026-04-15 6:42 ` kernel test robot
2026-04-16 6:40 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2026-04-16 7:40 ` Oliver Sang
2026-04-16 9:17 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-04-17 17:11 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-03-31 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 16/16] drm/i915/bios: remove VS/PE Override warning Michał Grzelak
2026-03-31 19:47 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for VS/PE Override support Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260417171104.GB426937@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=michal.grzelak@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox