From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/mtl: Don't set PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_L3 (rev5)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:14:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22223706-fdcc-d9d7-80e8-bdeb847bc8ef@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTALROwYzZNo4Jll@ashyti-mobl2.lan>
On 18/10/2023 17:43, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Vinay,
>
>> Possible regressions
>>
>> • igt@gem_exec_nop@basic-series:
>>
>> □ shard-glk: PASS -> INCOMPLETE +1 other test incomplete
>> • igt@kms_big_fb@4-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0-hflip-async-flip:
>>
>> □ shard-dg2: PASS -> TIMEOUT
>> • igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-onscreen-64x21@pipe-d-hdmi-a-1:
>>
>> □ shard-tglu: PASS -> INCOMPLETE
>> • igt@kms_psr@psr2_suspend:
>>
>> □ shard-mtlp: NOTRUN -> FAIL
>
> these failures look unrelated and besides they are not related to
> MTL.
There is something new on the shards which _seems_ to be implicating this patch.
This previously all green test started failing in a bad way:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13775/shard-mtlp-6/igt@sysfs_preempt_timeout@timeout@vecs0.html
<5> [97.816201] Fence expiration time out i915-0000:00:02.0:sysfs_preempt_t[1166]:2!
<3> [187.682308] INFO: task kworker/0:3:165 blocked for more than 61 seconds.
<3> [187.689294] Tainted: G W 6.6.0-rc6-CI_DRM_13775-ge69e078f7bef+ #1
<3> [187.697375] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
<6> [187.705354] task:kworker/0:3 state:D stack:13504 pid:165 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
<6> [187.705375] Workqueue: i915-unordered intel_gt_watchdog_work [i915]
<6> [187.705671] Call Trace:
<6> [187.705675] <TASK>
<6> [187.705683] __schedule+0x3a0/0xd70
<6> [187.705704] schedule+0x5c/0xd0
<6> [187.705713] guc_context_cancel_request+0x45e/0x9f0 [i915]
<6> [187.706078] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
<6> [187.706091] ? intel_gt_watchdog_work+0x20/0x260 [i915]
<6> [187.706377] intel_gt_watchdog_work+0xd1/0x260 [i915]
<6> [187.706624] ? process_scheduled_works+0x264/0x530
<6> [187.706635] process_scheduled_works+0x2db/0x530
<6> [187.706650] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
<6> [187.706656] worker_thread+0x18c/0x350
<6> [187.706664] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
<6> [187.706670] kthread+0xfe/0x130
<6> [187.706678] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
<6> [187.706687] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
<6> [187.706696] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
<6> [187.706704] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
<6> [187.706724] </TASK>
I am not claiming it is at fault but the transition from green to timing out looks clear.
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 19:53 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mtl: Don't set PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_L3 Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-10-17 20:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/mtl: Don't set PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_L3 (rev5) Patchwork
2023-10-18 1:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-10-18 16:43 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-19 8:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-10-19 14:49 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-19 15:05 ` Nirmoy Das
2023-10-19 15:44 ` Andi Shyti
2023-10-18 4:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mtl: Don't set PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_L3 Andi Shyti
2023-10-18 17:43 ` Andi Shyti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22223706-fdcc-d9d7-80e8-bdeb847bc8ef@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox