Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Jocelyn Falempe" <jfalempe@redhat.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@lankhorst.se>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] drm/{i915,xe}/panic: move framebuffer allocation where it belongs
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 18:04:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2224b0cc8934e4e7c89ed1fb80648c637669f188@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d29f63e0118d002fc8edd368caea7e8185418e17.1756835342.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, 02 Sep 2025, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> The struct intel_framebuffer allocation naturally belongs in intel_fb.c,
> not hidden inside panic implementation. Separate the panic
> allocation. Drop the unnecessary struct i915_framebuffer and struct
> xe_framebuffer types.
>
> Cc: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c    | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.c |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.h |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h |  5 +++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c  | 17 ++++-------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_panic.c      | 17 ++++-------------
>  6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> index 2a2ed0f0461f..22a4a1575d22 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> @@ -2346,7 +2346,22 @@ intel_user_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
>  
>  struct intel_framebuffer *intel_framebuffer_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	return intel_bo_alloc_framebuffer();
> +	struct intel_framebuffer *intel_fb;
> +	struct intel_panic *panic;
> +
> +	intel_fb = kzalloc(sizeof(*intel_fb), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!intel_fb)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	panic = intel_panic_alloc();
> +	if (!panic) {
> +		kfree(intel_fb);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	intel_fb->panic = panic;

So I screwed up here. There's no deallocation of fb->panic, and this
leaks. I don't know what I was thinking.

To make matters worse, struct intel_framebuffer is deallocated via
drm_framebuffer_put() i.e. there's no obvious place to plug the free in.

Any ideas before I start looking at reverting the changes, and get back
to the drawing board with abstracting the code between i915 and xe?

BR,
Jani.

> +
> +	return intel_fb;
>  }
>  
>  struct drm_framebuffer *
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.c
> index 20eecb0f168f..5431bd4d3a7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.c
> @@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
>  #include "gem/i915_gem_object.h"
>  #include "intel_panic.h"
>  
> -struct intel_framebuffer *intel_bo_alloc_framebuffer(void)
> +struct intel_panic *intel_panic_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	return i915_gem_object_alloc_framebuffer();
> +	return i915_gem_object_alloc_panic();
>  }
>  
>  int intel_panic_setup(struct drm_scanout_buffer *sb)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.h
> index 67ce253fcdf5..45ce6104e6fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panic.h
> @@ -6,8 +6,9 @@
>  
>  struct drm_scanout_buffer;
>  struct intel_framebuffer;
> +struct intel_panic;
>  
> -struct intel_framebuffer *intel_bo_alloc_framebuffer(void);
> +struct intel_panic *intel_panic_alloc(void);
>  int intel_panic_setup(struct drm_scanout_buffer *sb);
>  void intel_panic_finish(struct intel_framebuffer *fb);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> index 565f8fa330db..9b3f25cb48db 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> @@ -16,9 +16,10 @@
>  #include "i915_gem_ww.h"
>  #include "i915_vma_types.h"
>  
> -struct drm_scanout_buffer;
>  enum intel_region_id;
> +struct drm_scanout_buffer;
>  struct intel_framebuffer;
> +struct intel_panic;
>  
>  #define obj_to_i915(obj__) to_i915((obj__)->base.dev)
>  
> @@ -693,7 +694,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>  int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
>  int i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
>  
> -struct intel_framebuffer *i915_gem_object_alloc_framebuffer(void);
> +struct intel_panic *i915_gem_object_alloc_panic(void);
>  int i915_gem_object_panic_setup(struct drm_scanout_buffer *sb);
>  void i915_gem_object_panic_finish(struct intel_framebuffer *fb);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> index e36d60b785b1..b219474aecc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> @@ -363,11 +363,6 @@ struct intel_panic {
>  	void *vaddr;
>  };
>  
> -struct i915_framebuffer {
> -	struct intel_framebuffer base;
> -	struct intel_panic panic;
> -};
> -
>  static void i915_panic_kunmap(struct intel_panic *panic)
>  {
>  	if (panic->vaddr) {
> @@ -436,17 +431,13 @@ static void i915_gem_object_panic_page_set_pixel(struct drm_scanout_buffer *sb,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -struct intel_framebuffer *i915_gem_object_alloc_framebuffer(void)
> +struct intel_panic *i915_gem_object_alloc_panic(void)
>  {
> -	struct i915_framebuffer *i915_fb;
> -
> -	i915_fb = kzalloc(sizeof(*i915_fb), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!i915_fb)
> -		return NULL;
> +	struct intel_panic *panic;
>  
> -	i915_fb->base.panic = &i915_fb->panic;
> +	panic = kzalloc(sizeof(*panic), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
> -	return &i915_fb->base;
> +	return panic;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_panic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_panic.c
> index 3ef23a6795b3..b5a7615708a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_panic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_panic.c
> @@ -15,11 +15,6 @@ struct intel_panic {
>  	void *vaddr;
>  };
>  
> -struct xe_framebuffer {
> -	struct intel_framebuffer base;
> -	struct intel_panic panic;
> -};
> -
>  static void xe_panic_kunmap(struct intel_panic *panic)
>  {
>  	if (panic->vaddr) {
> @@ -62,17 +57,13 @@ static void xe_panic_page_set_pixel(struct drm_scanout_buffer *sb, unsigned int
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -struct intel_framebuffer *intel_bo_alloc_framebuffer(void)
> +struct intel_panic *intel_panic_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	struct xe_framebuffer *xe_fb;
> -
> -	xe_fb = kzalloc(sizeof(*xe_fb), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!xe_fb)
> -		return NULL;
> +	struct intel_panic *panic;
>  
> -	xe_fb->base.panic = &xe_fb->panic;
> +	panic = kzalloc(sizeof(*panic), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
> -	return &xe_fb->base;
> +	return panic;
>  }
>  
>  int intel_panic_setup(struct drm_scanout_buffer *sb)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-01 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-02 17:51 [PATCH 0/8] drm/{i915, xe}/panic: refactor framebuffer allocation etc Jani Nikula
2025-09-02 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/fb: add intel_framebuffer_alloc() Jani Nikula
2025-09-02 17:51 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/{i915,xe}/panic: split out intel_panic.[ch] Jani Nikula
2025-09-02 17:51 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/{i915, xe}/panic: rename intel_bo_panic_*() to intel_panic_*() Jani Nikula
2025-09-02 17:51 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/{i915, xe}/fb: add panic pointer member to struct intel_framebuffer Jani Nikula
2025-09-02 17:51 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/{i915, xe}/panic: rename struct {i915, xe}_panic_data to struct intel_panic Jani Nikula
2025-09-02 17:51 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/{i915, xe}/panic: move framebuffer allocation where it belongs Jani Nikula
2025-10-01 15:04   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-10-01 16:37     ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/{i915,xe}/panic: " Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-01 17:28       ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-01 17:43         ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-02 17:51 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/{i915, xe}/panic: convert intel_panic_finish() to struct intel_panic Jani Nikula
2025-09-02 17:51 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/{i915, xe}/panic: pass struct intel_panic to intel_panic_setup() Jani Nikula
2025-09-02 20:51 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/{i915, xe}/panic: refactor framebuffer allocation etc Patchwork
2025-09-03  7:05 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-04 11:46 ` [PATCH 0/8] " Jocelyn Falempe
2025-09-08 11:29   ` [PATCH 0/8] drm/{i915,xe}/panic: " Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2224b0cc8934e4e7c89ed1fb80648c637669f188@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jfalempe@redhat.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox