Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/20] drm/msm: always wait for the exclusive fence

["Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>]

Am 08.07.21 um 19:37 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
>
> Drivers also need to to sync to the exclusive fence when
> a shared one is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> [danvet: Not that hard to compile-test on arm ...]
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org

Wondering a bit why you have that in this patch set now.

But any objections that we push this now?

Thanks,
Christian.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 16 +++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> index 141178754231..d9c4f1deeafb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> @@ -812,17 +812,15 @@ int msm_gem_sync_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>   	struct dma_fence *fence;
>   	int i, ret;
>   
> -	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->resv);
> -	if (!fobj || (fobj->shared_count == 0)) {
> -		fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->resv);
> -		/* don't need to wait on our own fences, since ring is fifo */
> -		if (fence && (fence->context != fctx->context)) {
> -			ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
> -			if (ret)
> -				return ret;
> -		}
> +	fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->resv);
> +	/* don't need to wait on our own fences, since ring is fifo */
> +	if (fence && (fence->context != fctx->context)) {
> +		ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>   	}
>   
> +	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->resv);
>   	if (!exclusive || !fobj)
>   		return 0;
>   

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx