From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>,
Jack Zhang <Jack.Zhang1@amd.com>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/20] drm/sched: entity->rq selection cannot fail
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 08:53:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5588d1c3-833b-bd95-69e6-a103f2e8affa@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210708173754.3877540-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Am 08.07.21 um 19:37 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> If it does, someone managed to set up a sched_entity without
> schedulers, which is just a driver bug.
NAK, it is perfectly valid for rq selection to fail.
See drm_sched_pick_best():
if (!sched->ready) {
DRM_WARN("scheduler %s is not ready, skipping",
sched->name);
continue;
}
This can happen when a device reset fails for some engine.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> We BUG_ON() here because in the next patch drm_sched_job_init() will
> be split up, with drm_sched_job_arm() never failing. And that's the
> part where the rq selection will end up in.
>
> Note that if having an empty sched_list set on an entity is indeed a
> valid use-case, we can keep that check in job_init even after the split
> into job_init/arm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> Cc: Jack Zhang <Jack.Zhang1@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> index 79554aa4dbb1..6fc116ee7302 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
> * @guilty: atomic_t set to 1 when a job on this queue
> * is found to be guilty causing a timeout
> *
> - * Note: the sched_list should have at least one element to schedule
> + * Note: the sched_list must have at least one element to schedule
> * the entity
> *
> * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 33c414d55fab..01dd47154181 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -586,8 +586,7 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched;
>
> drm_sched_entity_select_rq(entity);
> - if (!entity->rq)
> - return -ENOENT;
> + BUG_ON(!entity->rq);
>
> sched = entity->rq->sched;
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-09 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-08 17:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/20] drm/sched dependency tracking and dma-resv fixes Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/20] drm/sched: entity->rq selection cannot fail Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09 6:53 ` Christian König [this message]
2021-07-09 7:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09 7:23 ` Christian König
2021-07-09 8:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09 8:11 ` Christian König
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/20] drm/sched: Split drm_sched_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/20] drm/sched: Barriers are needed for entity->last_scheduled Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 18:56 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-07-08 19:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 21:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09 6:57 ` Christian König
2021-07-09 7:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/20] drm/sched: Add dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/20] drm/sched: drop entity parameter from drm_sched_push_job Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/20] drm/sched: improve docs around drm_sched_entity Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/20] drm/panfrost: use scheduler dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 9:19 ` Steven Price
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/20] drm/lima: " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/20] drm/v3d: Move drm_sched_job_init to v3d_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/20] drm/v3d: Use scheduler dependency handling Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/20] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/20] drm/gem: Delete gem array fencing helpers Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/20] drm/sched: Don't store self-dependencies Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 14/20] drm/sched: Check locking in drm_sched_job_await_implicit Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 15/20] drm/msm: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/20] drm/msm: always wait for the exclusive fence Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09 8:48 ` Christian König
2021-07-09 9:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 17/20] drm/etnaviv: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 18/20] drm/i915: delete exclude argument from i915_sw_fence_await_reservation Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 19/20] drm/i915: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 20/20] dma-resv: Give the docs a do-over Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09 0:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency tracking and dma-resv fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-09 0:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-09 15:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5588d1c3-833b-bd95-69e6-a103f2e8affa@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Jack.Zhang1@amd.com \
--cc=andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox