From: "Anirban, Sk" <sk.anirban@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <karthik.poosa@intel.com>,
<anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Add delay to stabilize frequency in live_rps_power
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 12:07:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <261f6705-665e-4226-8fc7-b62ae95b7be1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734j559jc.fsf@intel.com>
On 03-12-2024 16:16, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2024, Sk Anirban <sk.anirban@intel.com> wrote:
>> Add delays to allow frequency stabilization before power measurement
>> to fix sporadic power conservation issues in live_rps_power test.
> Looks like band-aid. What's the root cause?
>
> BR,
> Jani.
In some cases, we have observed that the power consumption at the
minimum frequency is greater than at the maximum frequency. This is
likely due to the actual frequency not settling. The issue is sporadic,
and to address this, we are adding a delay after setting the freq and
before measuring the power.
Thanks,
Anirban
>> v2:
>> - Move delay to respective function (Badal)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sk Anirban <sk.anirban@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
>> index dcef8d498919..c207a4fb03bf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
>> @@ -1125,6 +1125,7 @@ static u64 measure_power(struct intel_rps *rps, int *freq)
>> static u64 measure_power_at(struct intel_rps *rps, int *freq)
>> {
>> *freq = rps_set_check(rps, *freq);
>> + msleep(100);
>> return measure_power(rps, freq);
>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-05 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-03 6:11 [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Add delay to stabilize frequency in live_rps_power Sk Anirban
2024-12-03 7:16 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Add delay to stabilize frequency in live_rps_power (rev2) Patchwork
2024-12-03 8:28 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2024-12-03 9:23 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Add delay to stabilize frequency in live_rps_power Nilawar, Badal
2024-12-03 10:46 ` Jani Nikula
2024-12-05 6:37 ` Anirban, Sk [this message]
2024-12-07 6:22 ` Raag Jadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=261f6705-665e-4226-8fc7-b62ae95b7be1@intel.com \
--to=sk.anirban@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox