* [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_big: 128MiB not enough slack? Let out the rope!
@ 2019-03-26 18:57 Chris Wilson
2019-03-27 6:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-03-26 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: igt-dev
Even with 128MiB reserved for other use, a single pass of gem_exec_big
runs out of memory. Give in and halve our batch size, that has to be
enough slack! As to why it keeps on failing, is left as an exercise to
the reader -- we have to solve the mm/ mystery one day, as eventually it
will be our only remaining source of bugs!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
index 015f59e29..440136ee8 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void single(int i915)
uint32_t handle;
void *ptr;
- batch_size = (intel_get_avail_ram_mb() - 128) << 20; /* CI slack */
+ batch_size = (intel_get_avail_ram_mb() / 2) << 20; /* XXX CI slack? */
limit = gem_aperture_size(i915) - (256 << 10); /* low pages reserved */
if (!gem_uses_full_ppgtt(i915))
limit = 3 * limit / 4;
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_big: 128MiB not enough slack? Let out the rope!
2019-03-26 18:57 [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_big: 128MiB not enough slack? Let out the rope! Chris Wilson
@ 2019-03-27 6:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2019-03-27 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx; +Cc: igt-dev
On 26/03/2019 18:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Even with 128MiB reserved for other use, a single pass of gem_exec_big
> runs out of memory. Give in and halve our batch size, that has to be
> enough slack! As to why it keeps on failing, is left as an exercise to
> the reader -- we have to solve the mm/ mystery one day, as eventually it
> will be our only remaining source of bugs!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
> index 015f59e29..440136ee8 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void single(int i915)
> uint32_t handle;
> void *ptr;
>
> - batch_size = (intel_get_avail_ram_mb() - 128) << 20; /* CI slack */
> + batch_size = (intel_get_avail_ram_mb() / 2) << 20; /* XXX CI slack? */
> limit = gem_aperture_size(i915) - (256 << 10); /* low pages reserved */
> if (!gem_uses_full_ppgtt(i915))
> limit = 3 * limit / 4;
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-27 6:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-26 18:57 [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_big: 128MiB not enough slack? Let out the rope! Chris Wilson
2019-03-27 6:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox