public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use per device iommu check
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:08:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a1ae709-19f8-7983-b171-98ec2f3f010a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b2e1427-69cf-8f5d-0c15-73c4e602953d@linux.intel.com>


On 10/11/2021 12:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2021/11/10 17:30, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 10/11/2021 07:12, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>> Hi Tvrtko,
>>>
>>> On 2021/11/9 20:17, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin<tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> On igfx + dgfx setups, it appears that intel_iommu=igfx_off option only
>>>> disables the igfx iommu. Stop relying on global intel_iommu_gfx_mapped
>>>> and probe presence of iommu domain per device to accurately reflect its
>>>> status.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin<tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Baolu, is my understanding here correct? Maybe I am confused by both
>>>> intel_iommu_gfx_mapped and dmar_map_gfx being globals in the 
>>>> intel_iommu
>>>> driver. But it certainly appears the setup can assign some iommu ops 
>>>> (and
>>>> assign the discrete i915 to iommu group) when those two are set to off.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> index e967cd08f23e..9fb38a54f1fe 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> @@ -1763,26 +1763,27 @@ static inline bool run_as_guest(void)
>>>   #define HAS_D12_PLANE_MINIMIZATION(dev_priv) 
>>> (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv) || \
>>>                             IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv))
>>>
>>> -static inline bool intel_vtd_active(void)
>>> +static inline bool intel_vtd_active(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>   {
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
>>> -    if (intel_iommu_gfx_mapped)
>>> +    if (iommu_get_domain_for_dev(i915->drm.dev))
>>>           return true;
>>> -#endif
>>>
>>>       /* Running as a guest, we assume the host is enforcing VT'd */
>>>       return run_as_guest();
>>>   }
>>>
>>> Have you verified this change? I am afraid that
>>> iommu_get_domain_for_dev() always gets a valid iommu domain even
>>> intel_iommu_gfx_mapped == 0.
>>
>> Yes it seems to work as is:
>>
>> default:
>>
>> # grep -i iommu /sys/kernel/debug/dri/*/i915_capabilities
>> /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_capabilities:iommu: enabled
>> /sys/kernel/debug/dri/1/i915_capabilities:iommu: enabled
>>
>> intel_iommu=igfx_off:
>>
>> # grep -i iommu /sys/kernel/debug/dri/*/i915_capabilities
>> /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_capabilities:iommu: disabled
>> /sys/kernel/debug/dri/1/i915_capabilities:iommu: enabled
>>
>> On my system dri device 0 is integrated graphics and 1 is discrete.
> 
> The drm device 0 has a dedicated iommu. When the user request igfx not
> mapped, the VT-d implementation will turn it off to save power. But for
> shared iommu, you definitely will get it enabled.

Sorry I am not following, what exactly do you mean? Is there a platform 
with integrated graphics without a dedicated iommu, in which case 
intel_iommu=igfx_off results in intel_iommu_gfx_mapped == 0 and 
iommu_get_domain_for_dev returning non-NULL?

Regards,

Tvrtko


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-10 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09 12:17 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use per device iommu check Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-09 14:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-11-09 16:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-11-09 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-11-09 17:35   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10  7:25     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10  9:35       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10 12:16         ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-10 12:26         ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10  7:12 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10  9:30   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10 12:04     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10 12:08       ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-11-10 12:35         ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10 14:11           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10 14:37             ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-11 15:18               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-12  0:58                 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-12 14:10                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-11 15:06           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-12  0:53             ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-12 13:40               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-25 10:00                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10  8:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Use per device iommu check (rev2) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-25 10:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use per device iommu check Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-25 11:47 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-26  8:26   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-26 14:00     ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a1ae709-19f8-7983-b171-98ec2f3f010a@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox