From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use per device iommu check
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:08:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a1ae709-19f8-7983-b171-98ec2f3f010a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b2e1427-69cf-8f5d-0c15-73c4e602953d@linux.intel.com>
On 10/11/2021 12:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2021/11/10 17:30, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 10/11/2021 07:12, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>> Hi Tvrtko,
>>>
>>> On 2021/11/9 20:17, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin<tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> On igfx + dgfx setups, it appears that intel_iommu=igfx_off option only
>>>> disables the igfx iommu. Stop relying on global intel_iommu_gfx_mapped
>>>> and probe presence of iommu domain per device to accurately reflect its
>>>> status.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin<tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Baolu, is my understanding here correct? Maybe I am confused by both
>>>> intel_iommu_gfx_mapped and dmar_map_gfx being globals in the
>>>> intel_iommu
>>>> driver. But it certainly appears the setup can assign some iommu ops
>>>> (and
>>>> assign the discrete i915 to iommu group) when those two are set to off.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> index e967cd08f23e..9fb38a54f1fe 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> @@ -1763,26 +1763,27 @@ static inline bool run_as_guest(void)
>>> #define HAS_D12_PLANE_MINIMIZATION(dev_priv)
>>> (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv) || \
>>> IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv))
>>>
>>> -static inline bool intel_vtd_active(void)
>>> +static inline bool intel_vtd_active(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>> {
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
>>> - if (intel_iommu_gfx_mapped)
>>> + if (iommu_get_domain_for_dev(i915->drm.dev))
>>> return true;
>>> -#endif
>>>
>>> /* Running as a guest, we assume the host is enforcing VT'd */
>>> return run_as_guest();
>>> }
>>>
>>> Have you verified this change? I am afraid that
>>> iommu_get_domain_for_dev() always gets a valid iommu domain even
>>> intel_iommu_gfx_mapped == 0.
>>
>> Yes it seems to work as is:
>>
>> default:
>>
>> # grep -i iommu /sys/kernel/debug/dri/*/i915_capabilities
>> /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_capabilities:iommu: enabled
>> /sys/kernel/debug/dri/1/i915_capabilities:iommu: enabled
>>
>> intel_iommu=igfx_off:
>>
>> # grep -i iommu /sys/kernel/debug/dri/*/i915_capabilities
>> /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_capabilities:iommu: disabled
>> /sys/kernel/debug/dri/1/i915_capabilities:iommu: enabled
>>
>> On my system dri device 0 is integrated graphics and 1 is discrete.
>
> The drm device 0 has a dedicated iommu. When the user request igfx not
> mapped, the VT-d implementation will turn it off to save power. But for
> shared iommu, you definitely will get it enabled.
Sorry I am not following, what exactly do you mean? Is there a platform
with integrated graphics without a dedicated iommu, in which case
intel_iommu=igfx_off results in intel_iommu_gfx_mapped == 0 and
iommu_get_domain_for_dev returning non-NULL?
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-10 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-09 12:17 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use per device iommu check Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-09 14:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-11-09 16:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-11-09 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-11-09 17:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10 7:25 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10 9:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10 12:16 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-10 12:26 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10 7:12 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10 9:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10 12:04 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10 12:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-11-10 12:35 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-10 14:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10 14:37 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-11 15:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-12 0:58 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-12 14:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-11 15:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-12 0:53 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-12 13:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-25 10:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-10 8:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Use per device iommu check (rev2) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-25 10:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use per device iommu check Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-25 11:47 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-26 8:26 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-26 14:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a1ae709-19f8-7983-b171-98ec2f3f010a@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox