Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Jocelyn Falempe" <jfalempe@redhat.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@lankhorst.se>,
	"Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/panic: fix panic structure allocation memory leak
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 13:51:02 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3198b351-b780-e068-e8b3-39608ebc597b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002101756.2700320-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --]

On Thu, 2 Oct 2025, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Separating the panic allocation from framebuffer allocation in commit
> 729c5f7ffa83 ("drm/{i915,xe}/panic: move framebuffer allocation where it
> belongs") failed to deallocate the panic structure anywhere.
>
> The fix is two-fold. First, free the panic structure in
> intel_user_framebuffer_destroy() in the general case. Second, move the
> panic allocation later to intel_framebuffer_init() to not leak the panic
> structure in error paths (if any, now or later) between
> intel_framebuffer_alloc() and intel_framebuffer_init().
>
> Fixes: 729c5f7ffa83 ("drm/{i915,xe}/panic: move framebuffer allocation where it belongs")
> Cc: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> Reported-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Have run a bunch of tests on affected platform, which previously caused
the issue to surface. With the patch applied no memleaks are reported.

Tested-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>

BR,
Michał

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-02 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-02 10:17 [PATCH] drm/i915/panic: fix panic structure allocation memory leak Jani Nikula
2025-10-02 11:51 ` Michał Grzelak [this message]
2025-10-02 15:18   ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-02 15:04 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-10-02 18:52 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3198b351-b780-e068-e8b3-39608ebc597b@intel.com \
    --to=michal.grzelak@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jfalempe@redhat.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox