From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Jocelyn Falempe" <jfalempe@redhat.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@lankhorst.se>,
"Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/panic: fix panic structure allocation memory leak
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 18:18:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <371d6debcc6b1977711481d32dd2527cc8c03b16@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3198b351-b780-e068-e8b3-39608ebc597b@intel.com>
On Thu, 02 Oct 2025, Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2025, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Separating the panic allocation from framebuffer allocation in commit
>> 729c5f7ffa83 ("drm/{i915,xe}/panic: move framebuffer allocation where it
>> belongs") failed to deallocate the panic structure anywhere.
>>
>> The fix is two-fold. First, free the panic structure in
>> intel_user_framebuffer_destroy() in the general case. Second, move the
>> panic allocation later to intel_framebuffer_init() to not leak the panic
>> structure in error paths (if any, now or later) between
>> intel_framebuffer_alloc() and intel_framebuffer_init().
>>
>> Fixes: 729c5f7ffa83 ("drm/{i915,xe}/panic: move framebuffer allocation where it belongs")
>> Cc: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
>> Reported-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
>> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Have run a bunch of tests on affected platform, which previously caused
> the issue to surface. With the patch applied no memleaks are reported.
>
> Tested-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Thanks for confirming!
Looks like we'll need to merge [1] first, or the stable backport of that
is going to be a nightmare.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251002115434.6486-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 10:17 [PATCH] drm/i915/panic: fix panic structure allocation memory leak Jani Nikula
2025-10-02 11:51 ` Michał Grzelak
2025-10-02 15:18 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-10-02 15:04 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-10-02 18:52 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=371d6debcc6b1977711481d32dd2527cc8c03b16@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jfalempe@redhat.com \
--cc=michal.grzelak@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox