From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Use current cdclk for DSC Bigjoiner BW check
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:00:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32039884-4045-478a-e03b-09afba2b15a3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCQYkQHDnPLX0Ee2@intel.com>
On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>> On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:14:49PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>>>> As per Bspec, Big Joiner BW check is:
>>>> Output bpp <= PPC * CDCLK frequency * Big joiner interface bits /
>>>> Pixel clock
>>>>
>>>> Currently we always use max_cdclk in the check for both modevalid
>>>> and compute config steps.
>>>>
>>>> During modevalid use max_cdclk_freq for the check.
>>>> During compute config step use current cdclk for the check.
>>> Nak. cdclk is computed much later based on what is actually needed.
>>> The cdclk freq you are using here is essentially a random number.
>> Oh I didn't realise that, perhaps I was lucky when I tested this.
>>
>> So this check where CDCLK is mentioned, actually expects max_cdclk_freq?
>>
>> If it doesnt then, we might have a compressed_bpp value, that might be
>> violating the big joiner bw check.
>>
>> Should this be handled while computing cdclk?
> Yes. I suggest adding something like intel_vdsc_min_cdclk() that
> handles all of it.
I can try that out.
Will also add *Pipe BW check*: Pixel clock < PPC * CDCLK frequency *
Number of pipes joined, which seems to be missing.
So with pipe bw_check cdclk should be > Pixel clock / (PPC * Number of
pipes joined)
In addition, as per bigjoiner check it should be >= compressed_bpp /
(PPC * bigjoiner interface bits).
Regards,
Ankit
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ankit
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 1 +
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 1 +
>>>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> index 3fe651a8f5d0..d6600de1ab49 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>> @@ -711,6 +711,7 @@ u32 intel_dp_dsc_nearest_valid_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 bpp, u32 p
>>>> u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>> u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>> u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
>>>> + unsigned int cdclk,
>>>> bool bigjoiner,
>>>> u32 pipe_bpp,
>>>> u32 timeslots)
>>>> @@ -757,9 +758,9 @@ u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>>
>>>> if (bigjoiner) {
>>>> int bigjoiner_interface_bits = DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= 12 ? 24 : 36;
>>>> - u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner =
>>>> - i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq * 2 * bigjoiner_interface_bits /
>>>> - intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
>>>> +
>>>> + u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner = cdclk * 2 * bigjoiner_interface_bits /
>>>> + intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
>>>>
>>>> bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_bigjoiner);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>>>> max_lanes,
>>>> target_clock,
>>>> mode->hdisplay,
>>>> + dev_priv->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq,
>>>> bigjoiner,
>>>> pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
>>>> dsc_slice_count =
>>>> @@ -1580,6 +1582,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>>> pipe_config->lane_count,
>>>> adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>>>> adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
>>>> + dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.cdclk,
>>>> pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
>>>> pipe_bpp,
>>>> timeslots);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>> index ef39e4f7a329..d150bfe8abf4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 dsc_max_bpc);
>>>> u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>> u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>> u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
>>>> + unsigned int cdclk,
>>>> bool bigjoiner,
>>>> u32 pipe_bpp,
>>>> u32 timeslots);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>> index a860cbc5dbea..266e31b78729 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>> @@ -925,6 +925,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>> max_lanes,
>>>> target_clock,
>>>> mode->hdisplay,
>>>> + dev_priv->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq,
>>>> bigjoiner,
>>>> pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
>>>> dsc_slice_count =
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-29 8:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Update DSC Bigjoiner BW check Ankit Nautiyal
2023-03-29 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Update Bigjoiner interface bits for computing compressed bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-03-29 9:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ankit Nautiyal
2023-03-29 10:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 11:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-29 11:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Use current cdclk for DSC Bigjoiner BW check Ankit Nautiyal
2023-03-29 9:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 10:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-29 10:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 11:30 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2023-03-29 11:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 13:44 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-03-29 14:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-30 11:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-30 11:11 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-04-03 21:33 ` Manasi Navare
2023-04-04 5:13 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-29 16:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Update DSC Bigjoiner BW check (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32039884-4045-478a-e03b-09afba2b15a3@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox