From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Use current cdclk for DSC Bigjoiner BW check
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:41:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbf095f7-a222-8763-5624-7440b645c5e7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCQiijNDxTqT98bw@intel.com>
On 3/29/2023 5:05 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>> On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>>>> On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:14:49PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>>>>>> As per Bspec, Big Joiner BW check is:
>>>>>> Output bpp <= PPC * CDCLK frequency * Big joiner interface bits /
>>>>>> Pixel clock
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently we always use max_cdclk in the check for both modevalid
>>>>>> and compute config steps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> During modevalid use max_cdclk_freq for the check.
>>>>>> During compute config step use current cdclk for the check.
>>>>> Nak. cdclk is computed much later based on what is actually needed.
>>>>> The cdclk freq you are using here is essentially a random number.
>>>> Oh I didn't realise that, perhaps I was lucky when I tested this.
>>>>
>>>> So this check where CDCLK is mentioned, actually expects max_cdclk_freq?
>>>>
>>>> If it doesnt then, we might have a compressed_bpp value, that might be
>>>> violating the big joiner bw check.
>>>>
>>>> Should this be handled while computing cdclk?
>>> Yes. I suggest adding something like intel_vdsc_min_cdclk() that
>>> handles all of it.
>>
>> I can try that out.
>>
>> Will also add *Pipe BW check*: Pixel clock < PPC * CDCLK frequency *
>> Number of pipes joined, which seems to be missing.
> That is already accounted for in the pixel rate.
Indeed, will club this check and the other bigjoiner_bw check in
intel_vdsc_min_cdclk, if the approach mentioned in the other mail is
acceptable.
Regards,
Ankit
>
>> So with pipe bw_check cdclk should be > Pixel clock / (PPC * Number of
>> pipes joined)
>>
>> In addition, as per bigjoiner check it should be >= compressed_bpp /
>> (PPC * bigjoiner interface bits).
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ankit
>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ankit
>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 1 +
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>> index 3fe651a8f5d0..d6600de1ab49 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>> @@ -711,6 +711,7 @@ u32 intel_dp_dsc_nearest_valid_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 bpp, u32 p
>>>>>> u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>>>> u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>>>> u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
>>>>>> + unsigned int cdclk,
>>>>>> bool bigjoiner,
>>>>>> u32 pipe_bpp,
>>>>>> u32 timeslots)
>>>>>> @@ -757,9 +758,9 @@ u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (bigjoiner) {
>>>>>> int bigjoiner_interface_bits = DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= 12 ? 24 : 36;
>>>>>> - u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner =
>>>>>> - i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq * 2 * bigjoiner_interface_bits /
>>>>>> - intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner = cdclk * 2 * bigjoiner_interface_bits /
>>>>>> + intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_bigjoiner);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> @@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>>>>>> max_lanes,
>>>>>> target_clock,
>>>>>> mode->hdisplay,
>>>>>> + dev_priv->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq,
>>>>>> bigjoiner,
>>>>>> pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
>>>>>> dsc_slice_count =
>>>>>> @@ -1580,6 +1582,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>>>>> pipe_config->lane_count,
>>>>>> adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>>>>>> adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
>>>>>> + dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.cdclk,
>>>>>> pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
>>>>>> pipe_bpp,
>>>>>> timeslots);
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>>>> index ef39e4f7a329..d150bfe8abf4 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>>>>>> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 dsc_max_bpc);
>>>>>> u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>>>> u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>>>> u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
>>>>>> + unsigned int cdclk,
>>>>>> bool bigjoiner,
>>>>>> u32 pipe_bpp,
>>>>>> u32 timeslots);
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>>>> index a860cbc5dbea..266e31b78729 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>>>>> @@ -925,6 +925,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>>>> max_lanes,
>>>>>> target_clock,
>>>>>> mode->hdisplay,
>>>>>> + dev_priv->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq,
>>>>>> bigjoiner,
>>>>>> pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
>>>>>> dsc_slice_count =
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-29 8:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Update DSC Bigjoiner BW check Ankit Nautiyal
2023-03-29 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Update Bigjoiner interface bits for computing compressed bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-03-29 9:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ankit Nautiyal
2023-03-29 10:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 11:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-29 11:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Use current cdclk for DSC Bigjoiner BW check Ankit Nautiyal
2023-03-29 9:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 10:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-29 10:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 11:30 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-29 11:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 13:44 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-03-29 14:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-30 11:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-30 11:11 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2023-04-03 21:33 ` Manasi Navare
2023-04-04 5:13 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-03-29 16:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Update DSC Bigjoiner BW check (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbf095f7-a222-8763-5624-7440b645c5e7@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox