From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"C, Ramalingam" <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Fix for PHY_MISC_TC1 offset
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:36:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <392e942460079346d1ce9d3a17db11f9d02a17f5.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ygy68/f1ERpTKJJW@intel.com>
On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 10:50 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:21:54AM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> > From: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> >
> > Currently ICL_PHY_MISC macro is returning offset 0x64C10 for PHY_E
> > port. Correct offset is 0x64C14.
>
> Why is it PHY_E and not PHY_F?
This is a valid question. It seems we have followed intel_phy_is_snps()
here:
// snip
else if (IS_DG2(dev_priv))
/*
* All four "combo" ports and the TC1 port (PHY E) use
* Synopsis PHYs.
*/
return phy <= PHY_E;
// snip
According to spec port E is "No connection". Better place to fix this
could be intel_phy_is_snps() itself?
>
> > Fix this by handling PHY_E port seprately.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 ++++--
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c
> > index c60575cb5368..f08061c748b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c
> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void intel_snps_phy_wait_for_calibration(struct
> > drm_i915_private *i915)
> > if (!intel_phy_is_snps(i915, phy))
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (intel_de_wait_for_clear(i915, ICL_PHY_MISC(phy),
> > + if (intel_de_wait_for_clear(i915, DG2_PHY_MISC(phy),
> > DG2_PHY_DP_TX_ACK_MASK,
> > 25))
> > drm_err(&i915->drm, "SNPS PHY %c failed to
> > calibrate after 25ms.\n",
> > phy);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 4d12abb2d7ff..354c25f483cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -9559,8 +9559,10 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> >
> > #define _ICL_PHY_MISC_A 0x64C00
> > #define _ICL_PHY_MISC_B 0x64C04
> > -#define ICL_PHY_MISC(port) _MMIO_PORT(port, _ICL_PHY_MISC_A, \
> > - _ICL_PHY_MISC_B)
> > +#define _DG2_PHY_MISC_TC1 0x64C14 /* TC1="PHY E" but offset as if
> > "PHY F" */
> > +#define ICL_PHY_MISC(port) _MMIO_PORT(port, _ICL_PHY_MISC_A,
> > _ICL_PHY_MISC_B)
> > +#define DG2_PHY_MISC(port) ((port) == PHY_E ?
> > _MMIO(_DG2_PHY_MISC_TC1) : \
> > + ICL_PHY_MISC(port))
> > #define ICL_PHY_MISC_MUX_DDID (1 << 28)
> > #define ICL_PHY_MISC_DE_IO_COMP_PWR_DOWN (1 << 23)
> > #define DG2_PHY_DP_TX_ACK_MASK REG_GENMASK(23,
> > 20)
> > --
> > 2.20.1
BR,
Jouni Högander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-16 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 5:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/dg2: 5th Display output Ramalingam C
2022-02-15 5:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dg2: Enable 5th display Ramalingam C
2022-02-16 8:02 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-02-17 16:33 ` Matt Roper
2022-02-17 16:37 ` Matt Roper
2022-02-17 17:46 ` Ramalingam C
2022-02-17 18:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/dg2: Enable 5th port Ramalingam C
2022-02-17 21:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-15 5:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/dg2: Drop 38.4 MHz MPLLB tables Ramalingam C
2022-02-16 8:06 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-02-17 19:35 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-15 5:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Fix for PHY_MISC_TC1 offset Ramalingam C
2022-02-16 8:16 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-02-16 8:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 9:36 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2022-02-16 10:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 14:11 ` Hogander, Jouni
2022-02-16 15:01 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-17 12:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-17 20:46 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-17 19:38 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-16 5:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dg2: 5th Display output Patchwork
2022-02-16 5:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-16 5:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-18 2:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dg2: 5th Display output (rev3) Patchwork
2022-02-18 2:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-18 3:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-18 13:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=392e942460079346d1ce9d3a17db11f9d02a17f5.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox