[CI] drm/{i915, xe}: move intel_opregion_suspend() to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late()

[CI] drm/{i915, xe}: move intel_opregion_suspend() to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late()

[Jani Nikula]

Try to unify the suspend paths and behaviour by moving the
intel_opregion_suspend() calls to
intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late().

This is a change in the suspend sequences. The idea behind adding this
to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late() is primarily based on not
having to pass the s2idle parameter to more functions than that.

This also changes behaviour for i915 hibernation, going for PCI_D3cold
instead of PCI_D1 on hibernate. It's probably the correct thing to do
anyway, I don't think it should matter all that much, but fingers
crossed.

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c                  | 4 ----
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c             | 3 ---
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
index 77009dca7d0d..abab457bce3a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
@@ -783,6 +783,8 @@ void intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late(struct intel_display *display, bool s2
 	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(display))
 		return;
 
+	intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
+
 	intel_display_power_suspend_late(display, s2idle);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
index 9e047c27a153..293099fe6639 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
@@ -1075,7 +1075,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 	struct intel_display *display = dev_priv->display;
-	pci_power_t opregion_target_state;
 
 	disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
 
@@ -1089,9 +1088,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	i9xx_display_sr_save(display);
 
-	opregion_target_state = suspend_to_idle(dev_priv) ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold;
-	intel_opregion_suspend(display, opregion_target_state);
-
 	dev_priv->suspend_count++;
 
 	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index aab416485e3e..7d19f3c42e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@ -238,14 +238,11 @@ static bool suspend_to_idle(void)
 void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
 {
 	struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
-	bool s2idle = suspend_to_idle();
 
 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
 		return;
 
 	intel_display_driver_pm_suspend(display);
-
-	intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
 }
 
 void xe_display_pm_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe)
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [CI] drm/{i915, xe}: move intel_opregion_suspend() to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late()

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 02:47:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Try to unify the suspend paths and behaviour by moving the
> intel_opregion_suspend() calls to
> intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late().
> 
> This is a change in the suspend sequences. The idea behind adding this
> to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late() is primarily based on not
> having to pass the s2idle parameter to more functions than that.
> 
> This also changes behaviour for i915 hibernation, going for PCI_D3cold
> instead of PCI_D1 on hibernate.

Pretty sure I pointed out before that this isn't true. PCI_D3cold is
what the current code also does.

I suppose it *might* be the case if one does something like 
'echo reboot > /sys/power/disk', but I've not actually checked
what that sort of thing does to acpi_target_system_state()...

> It's probably the correct thing to do
> anyway, I don't think it should matter all that much, but fingers
> crossed.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c                  | 4 ----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c             | 3 ---
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> index 77009dca7d0d..abab457bce3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> @@ -783,6 +783,8 @@ void intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late(struct intel_display *display, bool s2
>  	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(display))
>  		return;
>  
> +	intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
> +
>  	intel_display_power_suspend_late(display, s2idle);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> index 9e047c27a153..293099fe6639 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> @@ -1075,7 +1075,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>  	struct intel_display *display = dev_priv->display;
> -	pci_power_t opregion_target_state;
>  
>  	disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
>  
> @@ -1089,9 +1088,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>  	i9xx_display_sr_save(display);
>  
> -	opregion_target_state = suspend_to_idle(dev_priv) ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold;
> -	intel_opregion_suspend(display, opregion_target_state);
> -
>  	dev_priv->suspend_count++;
>  
>  	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> index aab416485e3e..7d19f3c42e0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> @@ -238,14 +238,11 @@ static bool suspend_to_idle(void)
>  void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
> -	bool s2idle = suspend_to_idle();
>  
>  	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>  		return;
>  
>  	intel_display_driver_pm_suspend(display);
> -
> -	intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
>  }
>  
>  void xe_display_pm_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe)
> -- 
> 2.47.3

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Re: [CI] drm/{i915, xe}: move intel_opregion_suspend() to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late()

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 08 Oct 2026, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 02:47:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Try to unify the suspend paths and behaviour by moving the
>> intel_opregion_suspend() calls to
>> intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late().
>> 
>> This is a change in the suspend sequences. The idea behind adding this
>> to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late() is primarily based on not
>> having to pass the s2idle parameter to more functions than that.
>> 
>> This also changes behaviour for i915 hibernation, going for PCI_D3cold
>> instead of PCI_D1 on hibernate.
>
> Pretty sure I pointed out before that this isn't true. PCI_D3cold is
> what the current code also does.

Right, you did, but I failed to address it. Sorry.

I have tried to track down what acpi_target_system_state() actually
returns during .freeze_late and .poweroff_late struct dev_pm_ops calls,
and it's far from obvious.

I don't think you can reliably say acpi_target_system_state() ==
ACPI_STATE_S4 on the paths that pass hibernation=true.

Are we good to go with the patch or do you want some changes?


BR,
Jani.


>
> I suppose it *might* be the case if one does something like 
> 'echo reboot > /sys/power/disk', but I've not actually checked
> what that sort of thing does to acpi_target_system_state()...
>
>> It's probably the correct thing to do
>> anyway, I don't think it should matter all that much, but fingers
>> crossed.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 ++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c                  | 4 ----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c             | 3 ---
>>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
>> index 77009dca7d0d..abab457bce3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
>> @@ -783,6 +783,8 @@ void intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late(struct intel_display *display, bool s2
>>  	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(display))
>>  		return;
>>  
>> +	intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
>> +
>>  	intel_display_power_suspend_late(display, s2idle);
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> index 9e047c27a153..293099fe6639 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> @@ -1075,7 +1075,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>>  {
>>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>>  	struct intel_display *display = dev_priv->display;
>> -	pci_power_t opregion_target_state;
>>  
>>  	disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
>>  
>> @@ -1089,9 +1088,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>>  
>>  	i9xx_display_sr_save(display);
>>  
>> -	opregion_target_state = suspend_to_idle(dev_priv) ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold;
>> -	intel_opregion_suspend(display, opregion_target_state);
>> -
>>  	dev_priv->suspend_count++;
>>  
>>  	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> index aab416485e3e..7d19f3c42e0e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> @@ -238,14 +238,11 @@ static bool suspend_to_idle(void)
>>  void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
>>  {
>>  	struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
>> -	bool s2idle = suspend_to_idle();
>>  
>>  	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>>  		return;
>>  
>>  	intel_display_driver_pm_suspend(display);
>> -
>> -	intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
>>  }
>>  
>>  void xe_display_pm_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe)
>> -- 
>> 2.47.3

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Re: [CI] drm/{i915, xe}: move intel_opregion_suspend() to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late()

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 05:00:04PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Oct 2026, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 02:47:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Try to unify the suspend paths and behaviour by moving the
> >> intel_opregion_suspend() calls to
> >> intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late().
> >> 
> >> This is a change in the suspend sequences. The idea behind adding this
> >> to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late() is primarily based on not
> >> having to pass the s2idle parameter to more functions than that.
> >> 
> >> This also changes behaviour for i915 hibernation, going for PCI_D3cold
> >> instead of PCI_D1 on hibernate.
> >
> > Pretty sure I pointed out before that this isn't true. PCI_D3cold is
> > what the current code also does.
> 
> Right, you did, but I failed to address it. Sorry.
> 
> I have tried to track down what acpi_target_system_state() actually
> returns during .freeze_late and .poweroff_late struct dev_pm_ops calls,
> and it's far from obvious.
> 
> I don't think you can reliably say acpi_target_system_state() ==
> ACPI_STATE_S4 on the paths that pass hibernation=true.

After staring at it a bit I think what I said is correct.

hibernation_snapshot() calls acpi_hibernation_begin() (assuming
/sys/power/disk==platform) prior to dpm_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE),
and hibernation_platform_enter() calls it again prior to
dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_HIBERNATE).

Also verified on an actual system, and both .freeze() and
.poweroff() see PCI_D3cold.

Looks like the thing that does change a bit is whether opregion
suspend happens at all during error handling and some pm_test
modes, because the _late() hooks may be skipped for those.

> 
> Are we good to go with the patch or do you want some changes?
> 
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> >
> > I suppose it *might* be the case if one does something like 
> > 'echo reboot > /sys/power/disk', but I've not actually checked
> > what that sort of thing does to acpi_target_system_state()...
> >
> >> It's probably the correct thing to do
> >> anyway, I don't think it should matter all that much, but fingers
> >> crossed.
> >> 
> >> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 ++
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c                  | 4 ----
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c             | 3 ---
> >>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> >> index 77009dca7d0d..abab457bce3a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> >> @@ -783,6 +783,8 @@ void intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late(struct intel_display *display, bool s2
> >>  	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(display))
> >>  		return;
> >>  
> >> +	intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
> >> +
> >>  	intel_display_power_suspend_late(display, s2idle);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> >> index 9e047c27a153..293099fe6639 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> >> @@ -1075,7 +1075,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >>  	struct intel_display *display = dev_priv->display;
> >> -	pci_power_t opregion_target_state;
> >>  
> >>  	disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> >>  
> >> @@ -1089,9 +1088,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>  
> >>  	i9xx_display_sr_save(display);
> >>  
> >> -	opregion_target_state = suspend_to_idle(dev_priv) ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold;
> >> -	intel_opregion_suspend(display, opregion_target_state);
> >> -
> >>  	dev_priv->suspend_count++;
> >>  
> >>  	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> index aab416485e3e..7d19f3c42e0e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> @@ -238,14 +238,11 @@ static bool suspend_to_idle(void)
> >>  void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
> >> -	bool s2idle = suspend_to_idle();
> >>  
> >>  	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> >>  		return;
> >>  
> >>  	intel_display_driver_pm_suspend(display);
> >> -
> >> -	intel_opregion_suspend(display, s2idle ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  void xe_display_pm_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe)
> >> -- 
> >> 2.47.3
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/{i915, xe}: move intel_opregion_suspend() to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late()

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2057 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/{i915, xe}: move intel_opregion_suspend() to intel_display_driver_pm_suspend_late()
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/175764/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_19298 -> Patchwork_175764v1
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_175764v1/index.html

Participating hosts (39 -> 38)
------------------------------

  Missing    (1): bat-dg2-13 

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_175764v1 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm:
    - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([i915#13735]) +80 other tests dmesg-warn
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19298/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_175764v1/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc:
    - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#13735] / [i915#15673]) +49 other tests dmesg-warn
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19298/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_175764v1/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc.html

  
  [i915#13735]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13735
  [i915#15673]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/15673


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_19298 -> Patchwork_175764v1

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_19298: 95bc52ddf34f72a3996b1f32e946304d3823be3c @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_9135: 9135
  Patchwork_175764v1: 95bc52ddf34f72a3996b1f32e946304d3823be3c @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_175764v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2753 bytes --]