From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>, <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Add Wa_22011802037 force cs halt
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:09:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40fa64ef-601c-fd7b-8acc-37cbb617920b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220413192730.3608660-7-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On 4/13/2022 12:27, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> From: Tilak Tangudu <tilak.tangudu@intel.com>
>
> Prior to doing a reset, SW must ensure command streamer is stopped,
> as a workaround, to eliminate a race condition in GPM flow.
> Setting both the ring stop and prefetch disable bits, will cause the
> command streamer to halt.
>
> v2: 1. Removed duplicate code and added only prefetch disable -Chris Wilson
>
> v3: 1. Applied wa for all gen12+ -Lahtinen Joonas/Vivi Rodrigo
>
> v4: 1. Added description in comment
> 2. Added WA prior to read barrier-Chris Wilson
>
> v5: 1. Modified to disable prefetch and wait for idle ack -Chris Wilson
Is this comment accurate? I'm not seeing a 'wait for idle ack' in the
deltas. There is a wait for idle function but it is already present and
not part of this patch change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tilak Tangudu <tilak.tangudu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 98b61ff13c95..14c6ddbbfde8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -1280,6 +1280,15 @@ static int __intel_engine_stop_cs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> int err;
>
> intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, mode, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(STOP_RING));
> +
> + /*
> + * Wa_22011802037 : gen12, Prior to doing a reset, ensure CS is
> + * stopped, set ring stop bit and prefetch disable bit to halt CS
> + */
> + if (GRAPHICS_VER(engine->i915) == 12)
> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, RING_MODE_GEN7(engine->mmio_base),
> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GEN12_GFX_PREFETCH_DISABLE));
> +
> err = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(engine->uncore, mode,
> MODE_IDLE, MODE_IDLE,
> fast_timeout_us,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h
> index 0bf8b45c9319..594a629cb28f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@
> #define GFX_SURFACE_FAULT_ENABLE (1 << 12)
> #define GFX_REPLAY_MODE (1 << 11)
> #define GFX_PSMI_GRANULARITY (1 << 10)
> +#define GEN12_GFX_PREFETCH_DISABLE REG_BIT(10)
So the PSMI_GRANULARITY bit is not valid for Gen12 onwards? I'm not
actually seeing it being used anywhere. So I guess it doesn't matte anyway!
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> #define GFX_PPGTT_ENABLE (1 << 9)
> #define GEN8_GFX_PPGTT_48B (1 << 7)
> #define GFX_FORWARD_VBLANK_MASK (3 << 5)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-15 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 19:27 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] Enable compute and related WAs for DG2 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/guc: Update context registration to new GuC API Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/guc: Update scheduling policies " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/guc: Update to GuC version 70.1.1 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/xehp: Add compute engine ABI Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Xe_HP SDV and DG2 have 4 CCS engines Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Add Wa_22011802037 force cs halt Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-15 0:09 ` John Harrison [this message]
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC based workarounds for DG2 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-15 20:29 ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/guc: Apply Wa_16011777198 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-15 0:15 ` John Harrison
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/dg2: Enable Wa_14014475959 - RCS / CCS context exit Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-15 0:21 ` John Harrison
2022-04-15 4:11 ` Matthew Brost
2022-04-13 19:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/dg2: Enable Wa_22012727170/Wa_22012727685 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-15 0:22 ` John Harrison
2022-04-15 0:28 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-04-14 1:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Enable compute and related WAs for DG2 Patchwork
2022-04-14 1:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-14 2:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40fa64ef-601c-fd7b-8acc-37cbb617920b@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox