Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/dg2: DG2 MBD config

["Gupta, Anshuman" <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 2:57 PM
> To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>; intel-
> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nilawar, Badal <badal.nilawar@intel.com>; Ewins, Jon
> <jon.ewins@intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>; Deak, Imre
> <imre.deak@intel.com>; Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/dg2: DG2 MBD config
> 
> On Wed, 18 May 2022, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
> > Add DG2 Motherboard Down Config check support.
> >
> > BSpec: 44477
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c | 2 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               | 9 +++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
> > index 3dcd54517b89..dec7628522c5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
> > @@ -1271,6 +1271,8 @@ intel_opregion_vram_sr_required(struct
> > drm_i915_private *i915)
> >
> >  	if (IS_DG1(i915))
> >  		return intel_opregion_dg1_mbd_config(i915);
> > +	else if (IS_DG2_MBD(i915))
> > +		return true;
> >
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 10f273800645..c5ecc490dced
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -1071,6 +1071,15 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private
> *i915,
> >  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11)
> #define
> > IS_DG2_G12(dev_priv) \
> >  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12)
> > +/*
> > + * FIXME: Need to define a new SUBPLATFORM
> INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_DG2_MBD
> > + * for PCI id range 5690..5695, but G10, G11 SUBPLATFROM conflicts
> > + * with those pci id range.
> > + */
> > +#define DG2_MBD_CONFIG_MASK	GENMASK(7, 4)
> > +#define DG2_MBD_CONFIG_VAL
> 	FIELD_PREP(DG2_MBD_CONFIG_MASK, 9)
> > +#define IS_DG2_MBD(dev_priv) (IS_DG2(dev_priv) && \
> > +			      (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) &
> DG2_MBD_CONFIG_MASK) ==
> > +DG2_MBD_CONFIG_VAL)
> 
> No. Please don't do *any* magic masking or comparison of PCI ID bits or
> bitfields.
Hi Matt,
We need to distinguish between DG2 NB MBD and rest such that i915 can figure out opregion vram_sr is requires for the DG2 platform.  Could you please suggestion on that.
Thanks,
Anshuman Gupta.
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> >  #define IS_ADLS_RPLS(dev_priv) \
> >  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_S,
> INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL)
> > #define IS_ADLP_N(dev_priv) \
> 
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center