public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@linux.intel.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: s/i915_wait_reqest/i915_wait_seqno/g
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:56:42 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAD992A.70402@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336769652-11740-4-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>

On 05/11/2012 05:54 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Wait request is poorly named IMO. After working with these functions for
> some time, I feel it's much clearer to name the functions more
> appropriately.
>
> Of course we must update the callers to use the new name as well.
>
> This leaves room within our namespace for a *real* wait request function
> at some point.
>
> Note to maintainer: this patch is optional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky<ben@bwidawsk.net>

My only bikeshedding is to 's/wait_reqest/wait_request' in patch title :).

Eugeni

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-11 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-11 20:54 [PATCH 1/4 v4] drm/i915: timeout parameter for seqno wait Ben Widawsky
2012-05-11 20:54 ` [PATCH 2/4 v3] drm/i915: improve i915_wait_request_begin trace Ben Widawsky
2012-05-11 20:54 ` [PATCH 3/4 v6] drm/i915: wait render timeout ioctl Ben Widawsky
2012-05-11 23:09   ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-05-12 21:07     ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-11 20:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: s/i915_wait_reqest/i915_wait_seqno/g Ben Widawsky
2012-05-11 22:56   ` Eugeni Dodonov [this message]
2012-05-12 21:20     ` Ben Widawsky
2012-05-11 20:54 ` [PATCH] intel: add a timed wait function Ben Widawsky
2012-05-11 20:54 ` [PATCH] tests/wait render timeout test Ben Widawsky
2012-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/4 v4] drm/i915: timeout parameter for seqno wait Eugeni Dodonov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FAD992A.70402@linux.intel.com \
    --to=eugeni.dodonov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=eugeni.dodonov@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox