From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: "Volkin, Bradley D" <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use hash tables for the command parser
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 16:50:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536BA7D0.7080803@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140508152716.GA21594@bdvolkin-ubuntu-desktop>
On 05/08/2014 04:27 PM, Volkin, Bradley D wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:56:05AM -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> On 04/28/2014 04:22 PM, bradley.d.volkin@intel.com wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> - BUG_ON(!validate_cmds_sorted(ring));
>>> + BUG_ON(!validate_cmds_sorted(ring, cmd_tables, cmd_table_count));
>>> BUG_ON(!validate_regs_sorted(ring));
>>> +
>>> + BUG_ON(init_hash_table(ring, cmd_tables, cmd_table_count));
>>
>> Is a BUG_ON a bit harsh since the above fails only on ENOMEM condition?
>>
>> If the concern is not allowing any command execution if parser setup has
>> failed, it would be nicer to the system as whole to just keep rejecting
>> everything, but let the rest of the kernel live to enable debug or whatever?
>>
>> I know it won't happen almost ever so it's a minor point really. I just
>> dislike actively hosing the whole system if it is avoidable.
>
> Hi Tvrtko,
>
> I agree that a BUG_ON might be harsh here. I suppose we could log an
> error and disable the command parser. Most command buffers would
> still go through fine but HW parsing would reject some that the SW
> parser might otherwise allow. That could be a bit odd if we ever did
> get a failure - apps/functionality that worked the last time I booted
> suddenly don't this time. The issue would be in the log though.
That would indeed be weird.
So command parser is just a more permissive whitelist, a super set of
hardware parser?
> I don't have a strong preference on this. Whatever people prefer.
Initially I was thinking of just rejecting all batch buffers if such
fundamental initialisation fails. It beats BUG_ON in the sense that it
leaves the system alive and it doesn't suffer from the random subtle
behaviour like if it would just disable the command parser.
It is a bit theoretical because it is likely system won't be too healthy
anyway if such a tiny allocation fails but you never know. It's better
not to crash it if we don't have to.
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 15:22 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use hash tables for the command parser bradley.d.volkin
2014-04-28 15:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-28 16:01 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-04-28 15:48 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-04-28 15:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-28 16:07 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-04-28 16:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-07 16:34 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-08 9:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-08 11:44 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 12:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-08 13:02 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 13:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-08 13:52 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 15:27 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-08 15:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-05-08 16:02 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-12 16:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-12 16:41 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-12 17:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-08 15:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2014-05-08 16:04 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-08 13:05 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 13:15 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 15:53 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-08 15:59 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 13:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-08 15:40 ` Volkin, Bradley D
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-10 21:10 bradley.d.volkin
2014-05-12 13:47 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-12 14:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-12 16:49 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536BA7D0.7080803@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bradley.d.volkin@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox