* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops
@ 2023-01-09 20:57 Hans de Goede
2023-01-09 21:14 ` Hans de Goede
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2023-01-09 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Rafael J . Wysocki, Mika Westerberg
Cc: Hans de Goede, intel-gfx, linux-acpi, dri-devel, Len Brown
The Dell Latitude E6430 both with and without the optional NVidia dGPU
has a bug in its ACPI tables which is causing Linux to assign the wrong
ACPI fwnode / companion to the pci_device for the i915 iGPU.
Specifically under the PCI root bridge there are these 2 ACPI Device()s :
Scope (_SB.PCI0)
{
Device (GFX0)
{
Name (_ADR, 0x00020000) // _ADR: Address
}
...
Device (VID)
{
Name (_ADR, 0x00020000) // _ADR: Address
...
Method (_DOS, 1, NotSerialized) // _DOS: Disable Output Switching
{
VDP8 = Arg0
VDP1 (One, VDP8)
}
Method (_DOD, 0, NotSerialized) // _DOD: Display Output Devices
{
...
}
...
}
}
The non-functional GFX0 ACPI device is a problem, because this gets
returned as ACPI companion-device by acpi_find_child_device() for the iGPU.
This is a long standing problem and the i915 driver does use the ACPI
companion for some things, but works fine without it.
However since commit 63f534b8bad9 ("ACPI: PCI: Rework acpi_get_pci_dev()")
acpi_get_pci_dev() relies on the physical-node pointer in the acpi_device
and that is set on the wrong acpi_device because of the wrong
acpi_find_child_device() return. This breaks the ACPI video code, leading
to non working backlight control in some cases.
Make find_child_checks() return a higher score for children which have
pnp-ids set by various scan helpers like acpi_is_video_device(), so
that it picks the right companion-device.
An alternative approach would be to directly call acpi_is_video_device()
from find_child_checks() but that would be somewhat computationally
expensive given that acpi_find_child_device() iterates over all the
PCI0 children every time it is called.
Fixes: 63f534b8bad9 ("ACPI: PCI: Rework acpi_get_pci_dev()")
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
drivers/acpi/glue.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
index 204fe94c7e45..2055dfd7678b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/glue.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type *acpi_get_bus_type(struct device *dev)
}
#define FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE 1
-#define FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE 2
+#define FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE 3
static int match_any(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
{
@@ -89,15 +89,25 @@ static bool acpi_dev_has_children(struct acpi_device *adev)
static int find_child_checks(struct acpi_device *adev, bool check_children)
{
+ int score = FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
unsigned long long sta;
acpi_status status;
if (check_children && !acpi_dev_has_children(adev))
return -ENODEV;
+ /*
+ * For devices without a _STA method, prefer devices without a _HID
+ * (which conflicts with having an _ADR) but which have been matched
+ * in some other way, like e.g. by acpi_is_video_device() over devices
+ * with no ids at all.
+ */
+ if (!adev->pnp.type.platform_id && adev->pnp.type.hardware_id)
+ score++;
+
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
- return FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
+ return score;
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED))
return -ENODEV;
--
2.39.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops
2023-01-09 20:57 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops Hans de Goede
@ 2023-01-09 21:14 ` Hans de Goede
2023-01-09 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-01-10 13:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2023-01-09 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Rafael J . Wysocki, Mika Westerberg,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-acpi, intel-gfx, dri-devel, Len Brown
p.s.
This fixes a regression in 6.1, adding the regressions list to the Cc.
Once we figure out the best way to fix this (this patch is more of a proposal
how to fix this rather then a definitive fix), we should also backport
the fix to 6.1.y.
On 1/9/23 21:57, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The Dell Latitude E6430 both with and without the optional NVidia dGPU
> has a bug in its ACPI tables which is causing Linux to assign the wrong
> ACPI fwnode / companion to the pci_device for the i915 iGPU.
>
> Specifically under the PCI root bridge there are these 2 ACPI Device()s :
>
> Scope (_SB.PCI0)
> {
> Device (GFX0)
> {
> Name (_ADR, 0x00020000) // _ADR: Address
> }
>
> ...
>
> Device (VID)
> {
> Name (_ADR, 0x00020000) // _ADR: Address
> ...
>
> Method (_DOS, 1, NotSerialized) // _DOS: Disable Output Switching
> {
> VDP8 = Arg0
> VDP1 (One, VDP8)
> }
>
> Method (_DOD, 0, NotSerialized) // _DOD: Display Output Devices
> {
> ...
> }
> ...
> }
> }
>
> The non-functional GFX0 ACPI device is a problem, because this gets
> returned as ACPI companion-device by acpi_find_child_device() for the iGPU.
>
> This is a long standing problem and the i915 driver does use the ACPI
> companion for some things, but works fine without it.
>
> However since commit 63f534b8bad9 ("ACPI: PCI: Rework acpi_get_pci_dev()")
> acpi_get_pci_dev() relies on the physical-node pointer in the acpi_device
> and that is set on the wrong acpi_device because of the wrong
> acpi_find_child_device() return. This breaks the ACPI video code, leading
> to non working backlight control in some cases.
>
> Make find_child_checks() return a higher score for children which have
> pnp-ids set by various scan helpers like acpi_is_video_device(), so
> that it picks the right companion-device.
>
> An alternative approach would be to directly call acpi_is_video_device()
> from find_child_checks() but that would be somewhat computationally
> expensive given that acpi_find_child_device() iterates over all the
> PCI0 children every time it is called.
>
> Fixes: 63f534b8bad9 ("ACPI: PCI: Rework acpi_get_pci_dev()")
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/glue.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> index 204fe94c7e45..2055dfd7678b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type *acpi_get_bus_type(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> #define FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE 1
> -#define FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE 2
> +#define FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE 3
>
> static int match_any(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
> {
> @@ -89,15 +89,25 @@ static bool acpi_dev_has_children(struct acpi_device *adev)
>
> static int find_child_checks(struct acpi_device *adev, bool check_children)
> {
> + int score = FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
> unsigned long long sta;
> acpi_status status;
>
> if (check_children && !acpi_dev_has_children(adev))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /*
> + * For devices without a _STA method, prefer devices without a _HID
> + * (which conflicts with having an _ADR) but which have been matched
> + * in some other way, like e.g. by acpi_is_video_device() over devices
> + * with no ids at all.
> + */
> + if (!adev->pnp.type.platform_id && adev->pnp.type.hardware_id)
> + score++;
> +
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
> if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
> - return FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
> + return score;
>
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED))
> return -ENODEV;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops
2023-01-09 20:57 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops Hans de Goede
2023-01-09 21:14 ` Hans de Goede
@ 2023-01-09 22:38 ` Patchwork
2023-01-10 13:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-01-09 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans de Goede; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10396 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112572/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12560 -> Patchwork_112572v1
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_112572v1 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_112572v1, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/index.html
Participating hosts (37 -> 39)
------------------------------
Additional (3): fi-kbl-soraka fi-rkl-11600 fi-bsw-kefka
Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_112572v1:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@guc:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html
#### Suppressed ####
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
- {bat-rpls-1}: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem.html
* {igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend}:
- {bat-rpls-2}: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
* {igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@dp-hpd-fast}:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] +7 similar issues
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@dp-hpd-fast.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_112572v1 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@debugfs_test@basic-hwmon:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([i915#7456])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@debugfs_test@basic-hwmon.html
* igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#109271]) +7 similar issues
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic.html
* igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([i915#2190])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random-engines.html
* igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([i915#3282])
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html
* igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([i915#7561])
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([i915#5334])
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
- fi-apl-guc: [PASS][14] -> [DMESG-FAIL][15] ([i915#5334])
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12560/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][16] ([i915#1886])
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
* igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][17] ([i915#4817])
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][18] ([i915#4103])
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor.html
* igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][19] ([fdo#109285] / [i915#4098])
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect.html
* igt@kms_psr@sprite_plane_onoff:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([i915#1072]) +3 similar issues
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_psr@sprite_plane_onoff.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][21] ([i915#3555] / [i915#4098])
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip:
- fi-bsw-kefka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][22] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip.html
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-read:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][23] ([fdo#109295] / [i915#3291] / [i915#3708]) +2 similar issues
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@prime_vgem@basic-read.html
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr:
- fi-rkl-11600: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][24] ([fdo#109295] / [i915#3301] / [i915#3708])
[24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@reset:
- {bat-rpls-2}: [DMESG-FAIL][25] ([i915#4983]) -> [PASS][26]
[25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12560/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@reset.html
[26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@reset.html
- {bat-rpls-1}: [DMESG-FAIL][27] ([i915#4983]) -> [PASS][28]
[27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12560/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@reset.html
[28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@reset.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor@atomic-transitions-varying-size:
- fi-bsw-n3050: [FAIL][29] ([i915#6298]) -> [PASS][30]
[29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12560/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor@atomic-transitions-varying-size.html
[30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor@atomic-transitions-varying-size.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[fdo#109285]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109285
[fdo#109295]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109295
[i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
[i915#1845]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1845
[i915#1886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1886
[i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
[i915#3282]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3282
[i915#3291]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3291
[i915#3301]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3301
[i915#3555]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3555
[i915#3708]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3708
[i915#4098]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4098
[i915#4103]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4103
[i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
[i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
[i915#4817]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4817
[i915#4983]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4983
[i915#5334]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5334
[i915#6298]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6298
[i915#6997]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6997
[i915#7077]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7077
[i915#7456]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7456
[i915#7561]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7561
[i915#7654]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7654
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_12560 -> Patchwork_112572v1
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_12560: 0eccbe4822259a5e1a78bb7a4c027514d26a2b23 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_7113: 15562e123ee6ed88163c7da2ef330dfe9bbd16a5 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
Patchwork_112572v1: 0eccbe4822259a5e1a78bb7a4c027514d26a2b23 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
### Linux commits
a76273d644d6 ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112572v1/index.html
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12011 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops
2023-01-09 20:57 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops Hans de Goede
2023-01-09 21:14 ` Hans de Goede
2023-01-09 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2023-01-10 13:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-10 15:29 ` Hans de Goede
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2023-01-10 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans de Goede
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-acpi,
Mika Westerberg, Len Brown
On Monday, January 9, 2023 9:57:21 PM CET Hans de Goede wrote:
> The Dell Latitude E6430 both with and without the optional NVidia dGPU
> has a bug in its ACPI tables which is causing Linux to assign the wrong
> ACPI fwnode / companion to the pci_device for the i915 iGPU.
>
> Specifically under the PCI root bridge there are these 2 ACPI Device()s :
>
> Scope (_SB.PCI0)
> {
> Device (GFX0)
> {
> Name (_ADR, 0x00020000) // _ADR: Address
> }
>
> ...
>
> Device (VID)
> {
> Name (_ADR, 0x00020000) // _ADR: Address
> ...
>
> Method (_DOS, 1, NotSerialized) // _DOS: Disable Output Switching
> {
> VDP8 = Arg0
> VDP1 (One, VDP8)
> }
>
> Method (_DOD, 0, NotSerialized) // _DOD: Display Output Devices
> {
> ...
> }
> ...
> }
> }
>
> The non-functional GFX0 ACPI device is a problem, because this gets
> returned as ACPI companion-device by acpi_find_child_device() for the iGPU.
>
> This is a long standing problem and the i915 driver does use the ACPI
> companion for some things, but works fine without it.
>
> However since commit 63f534b8bad9 ("ACPI: PCI: Rework acpi_get_pci_dev()")
> acpi_get_pci_dev() relies on the physical-node pointer in the acpi_device
> and that is set on the wrong acpi_device because of the wrong
> acpi_find_child_device() return. This breaks the ACPI video code, leading
> to non working backlight control in some cases.
Interesting. Sorry for the trouble.
> Make find_child_checks() return a higher score for children which have
> pnp-ids set by various scan helpers like acpi_is_video_device(), so
> that it picks the right companion-device.
This has a potential of changing the behavior in some cases that are not
relevant here which is generally risky.
> An alternative approach would be to directly call acpi_is_video_device()
> from find_child_checks() but that would be somewhat computationally
> expensive given that acpi_find_child_device() iterates over all the
> PCI0 children every time it is called.
I agree with the above, but my fix would be something like the patch below (not
really tested, but it builds).
---
drivers/acpi/glue.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 7 +++++--
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ struct acpi_pnp_type {
u32 hardware_id:1;
u32 bus_address:1;
u32 platform_id:1;
- u32 reserved:29;
+ u32 backlight:1;
+ u32 reserved:28;
};
struct acpi_device_pnp {
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1370,9 +1370,12 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle
* Some devices don't reliably have _HIDs & _CIDs, so add
* synthetic HIDs to make sure drivers can find them.
*/
- if (acpi_is_video_device(handle))
+ if (acpi_is_video_device(handle)) {
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_VIDEO_HID);
- else if (acpi_bay_match(handle))
+ pnp->type.backlight = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (acpi_bay_match(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_BAY_HID);
else if (acpi_dock_match(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_DOCK_HID);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/glue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/glue.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/glue.c
@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type *acpi_get_bu
}
#define FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE 1
-#define FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE 2
+#define FIND_CHILD_MID_SCORE 2
+#define FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE 3
static int match_any(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
{
@@ -96,8 +97,17 @@ static int find_child_checks(struct acpi
return -ENODEV;
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
- if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
+ if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND) {
+ /*
+ * Special case: backlight device objects without _STA are
+ * preferred to other objects with the same _ADR value, because
+ * it is more likely that they are actually useful.
+ */
+ if (adev->pnp.type.backlight)
+ return FIND_CHILD_MID_SCORE;
+
return FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
+ }
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED))
return -ENODEV;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops
2023-01-10 13:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2023-01-10 15:29 ` Hans de Goede
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2023-01-10 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-acpi,
Mika Westerberg, Len Brown
Hi Rafael,
On 1/10/23 14:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, January 9, 2023 9:57:21 PM CET Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The Dell Latitude E6430 both with and without the optional NVidia dGPU
>> has a bug in its ACPI tables which is causing Linux to assign the wrong
>> ACPI fwnode / companion to the pci_device for the i915 iGPU.
>>
>> Specifically under the PCI root bridge there are these 2 ACPI Device()s :
>>
>> Scope (_SB.PCI0)
>> {
>> Device (GFX0)
>> {
>> Name (_ADR, 0x00020000) // _ADR: Address
>> }
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Device (VID)
>> {
>> Name (_ADR, 0x00020000) // _ADR: Address
>> ...
>>
>> Method (_DOS, 1, NotSerialized) // _DOS: Disable Output Switching
>> {
>> VDP8 = Arg0
>> VDP1 (One, VDP8)
>> }
>>
>> Method (_DOD, 0, NotSerialized) // _DOD: Display Output Devices
>> {
>> ...
>> }
>> ...
>> }
>> }
>>
>> The non-functional GFX0 ACPI device is a problem, because this gets
>> returned as ACPI companion-device by acpi_find_child_device() for the iGPU.
>>
>> This is a long standing problem and the i915 driver does use the ACPI
>> companion for some things, but works fine without it.
>>
>> However since commit 63f534b8bad9 ("ACPI: PCI: Rework acpi_get_pci_dev()")
>> acpi_get_pci_dev() relies on the physical-node pointer in the acpi_device
>> and that is set on the wrong acpi_device because of the wrong
>> acpi_find_child_device() return. This breaks the ACPI video code, leading
>> to non working backlight control in some cases.
>
> Interesting. Sorry for the trouble.
No problem, as mentioned this is actually a long standing issue / bug
in the ACPI tables, it just never surfaced before.
>> Make find_child_checks() return a higher score for children which have
>> pnp-ids set by various scan helpers like acpi_is_video_device(), so
>> that it picks the right companion-device.
>
> This has a potential of changing the behavior in some cases that are not
> relevant here which is generally risky.
>
>> An alternative approach would be to directly call acpi_is_video_device()
>> from find_child_checks() but that would be somewhat computationally
>> expensive given that acpi_find_child_device() iterates over all the
>> PCI0 children every time it is called.
>
> I agree with the above, but my fix would be something like the patch below (not
> really tested, but it builds).
Thanks, I have just given this a spin on my E6430 and I can confirm
it still fixes things.
I'll send out this version (re-using most of the v1 commitmsg) as a v2
right away.
Regards,
Hans
>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/glue.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 7 +++++--
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ struct acpi_pnp_type {
> u32 hardware_id:1;
> u32 bus_address:1;
> u32 platform_id:1;
> - u32 reserved:29;
> + u32 backlight:1;
> + u32 reserved:28;
> };
>
> struct acpi_device_pnp {
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1370,9 +1370,12 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle
> * Some devices don't reliably have _HIDs & _CIDs, so add
> * synthetic HIDs to make sure drivers can find them.
> */
> - if (acpi_is_video_device(handle))
> + if (acpi_is_video_device(handle)) {
> acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_VIDEO_HID);
> - else if (acpi_bay_match(handle))
> + pnp->type.backlight = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (acpi_bay_match(handle))
> acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_BAY_HID);
> else if (acpi_dock_match(handle))
> acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_DOCK_HID);
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type *acpi_get_bu
> }
>
> #define FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE 1
> -#define FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE 2
> +#define FIND_CHILD_MID_SCORE 2
> +#define FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE 3
>
> static int match_any(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
> {
> @@ -96,8 +97,17 @@ static int find_child_checks(struct acpi
> return -ENODEV;
>
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
> - if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
> + if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> + /*
> + * Special case: backlight device objects without _STA are
> + * preferred to other objects with the same _ADR value, because
> + * it is more likely that they are actually useful.
> + */
> + if (adev->pnp.type.backlight)
> + return FIND_CHILD_MID_SCORE;
> +
> return FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
> + }
>
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED))
> return -ENODEV;
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-10 15:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-09 20:57 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI: Fix selecting the wrong ACPI fwnode for the iGPU on some Dell laptops Hans de Goede
2023-01-09 21:14 ` Hans de Goede
2023-01-09 22:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-01-10 13:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-10 15:29 ` Hans de Goede
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox