public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Nuke skl wm.dirty_pipes bitmask
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:18:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57ea78bd0b81f076b392ff52eea061224114f126.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011200949.7839-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 23:09 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The dirty_pipes bitmask is now unused. Get rid of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 35 +----------------------------
> ----
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index eba9055c4405..c16ba85e2ec8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -901,7 +901,6 @@ struct skl_ddb_allocation {
>  };
>  
>  struct skl_ddb_values {
> -	unsigned dirty_pipes;
>  	struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
>  };

As you know, I have also removed skl_ddb_allocation
however as your patch is not yet on drm-tip, I guess
I can't remove skl_ddb_values for now, probably I will
just start using dev_priv for enabled_slices for now.
If your patch set lands before mine I will then nuke it.

So, Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>


>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 390d1f8d45ba..ccbb732cff44 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5130,23 +5130,6 @@ static bool skl_plane_wm_equals(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	return skl_wm_level_equals(&wm1->trans_wm, &wm2->trans_wm);
>  }
>  
> -static bool skl_pipe_wm_equals(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> -			       const struct skl_pipe_wm *wm1,
> -			       const struct skl_pipe_wm *wm2)
> -{
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> -	enum plane_id plane_id;
> -
> -	for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> -		if (!skl_plane_wm_equals(dev_priv,
> -					 &wm1->planes[plane_id],
> -					 &wm2->planes[plane_id]))
> -			return false;
> -	}
> -
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
>  static inline bool skl_ddb_entries_overlap(const struct
> skl_ddb_entry *a,
>  					   const struct skl_ddb_entry
> *b)
>  {
> @@ -5403,8 +5386,6 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>  	 * to grab the lock on *all* CRTC's.
>  	 */
>  	if (state->active_pipe_changes || state->modeset) {
> -		state->wm_results.dirty_pipes = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)-
> >pipe_mask;
> -
>  		ret = intel_add_all_pipes(state);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -5479,12 +5460,8 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state)
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
> -	struct skl_ddb_values *results = &state->wm_results;
>  	int ret, i;
>  
> -	/* Clear all dirty flags */
> -	results->dirty_pipes = 0;
> -
>  	ret = skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(state);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -5492,8 +5469,7 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state)
>  	/*
>  	 * Calculate WM's for all pipes that are part of this
> transaction.
>  	 * Note that skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes may have added more
> CRTC's that
> -	 * weren't otherwise being modified (and set bits in
> dirty_pipes) if
> -	 * pipe allocations had to change.
> +	 * weren't otherwise being modified if pipe allocations had to
> change.
>  	 */
>  	for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> old_crtc_state,
>  					    new_crtc_state, i) {
> @@ -5504,11 +5480,6 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state)
>  		ret = skl_wm_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> -
> -		if (!skl_pipe_wm_equals(crtc,
> -					&old_crtc_state-
> >wm.skl.optimal,
> -					&new_crtc_state-
> >wm.skl.optimal))
> -			results->dirty_pipes |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = skl_compute_ddb(state);
> @@ -5644,7 +5615,6 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc
> *crtc,
>  
>  void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	struct skl_ddb_values *hw = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw;
>  	struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> @@ -5654,9 +5624,6 @@ void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
>  
>  		skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(crtc, &crtc_state-
> >wm.skl.optimal);
> -
> -		if (crtc->active)
> -			hw->dirty_pipes |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (dev_priv->active_pipes) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Nuke skl wm.dirty_pipes bitmask
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:18:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57ea78bd0b81f076b392ff52eea061224114f126.camel@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191129091847.sO4ARHYjBi7WQG1dNk1A-4Sy4bHlDefRjkd-zdbazK8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011200949.7839-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 23:09 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The dirty_pipes bitmask is now unused. Get rid of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 35 +----------------------------
> ----
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index eba9055c4405..c16ba85e2ec8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -901,7 +901,6 @@ struct skl_ddb_allocation {
>  };
>  
>  struct skl_ddb_values {
> -	unsigned dirty_pipes;
>  	struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
>  };

As you know, I have also removed skl_ddb_allocation
however as your patch is not yet on drm-tip, I guess
I can't remove skl_ddb_values for now, probably I will
just start using dev_priv for enabled_slices for now.
If your patch set lands before mine I will then nuke it.

So, Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>


>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 390d1f8d45ba..ccbb732cff44 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5130,23 +5130,6 @@ static bool skl_plane_wm_equals(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	return skl_wm_level_equals(&wm1->trans_wm, &wm2->trans_wm);
>  }
>  
> -static bool skl_pipe_wm_equals(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> -			       const struct skl_pipe_wm *wm1,
> -			       const struct skl_pipe_wm *wm2)
> -{
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> -	enum plane_id plane_id;
> -
> -	for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> -		if (!skl_plane_wm_equals(dev_priv,
> -					 &wm1->planes[plane_id],
> -					 &wm2->planes[plane_id]))
> -			return false;
> -	}
> -
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
>  static inline bool skl_ddb_entries_overlap(const struct
> skl_ddb_entry *a,
>  					   const struct skl_ddb_entry
> *b)
>  {
> @@ -5403,8 +5386,6 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>  	 * to grab the lock on *all* CRTC's.
>  	 */
>  	if (state->active_pipe_changes || state->modeset) {
> -		state->wm_results.dirty_pipes = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)-
> >pipe_mask;
> -
>  		ret = intel_add_all_pipes(state);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -5479,12 +5460,8 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state)
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
> -	struct skl_ddb_values *results = &state->wm_results;
>  	int ret, i;
>  
> -	/* Clear all dirty flags */
> -	results->dirty_pipes = 0;
> -
>  	ret = skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(state);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -5492,8 +5469,7 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state)
>  	/*
>  	 * Calculate WM's for all pipes that are part of this
> transaction.
>  	 * Note that skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes may have added more
> CRTC's that
> -	 * weren't otherwise being modified (and set bits in
> dirty_pipes) if
> -	 * pipe allocations had to change.
> +	 * weren't otherwise being modified if pipe allocations had to
> change.
>  	 */
>  	for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> old_crtc_state,
>  					    new_crtc_state, i) {
> @@ -5504,11 +5480,6 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state)
>  		ret = skl_wm_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> -
> -		if (!skl_pipe_wm_equals(crtc,
> -					&old_crtc_state-
> >wm.skl.optimal,
> -					&new_crtc_state-
> >wm.skl.optimal))
> -			results->dirty_pipes |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = skl_compute_ddb(state);
> @@ -5644,7 +5615,6 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc
> *crtc,
>  
>  void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	struct skl_ddb_values *hw = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw;
>  	struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> @@ -5654,9 +5624,6 @@ void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
>  
>  		skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(crtc, &crtc_state-
> >wm.skl.optimal);
> -
> -		if (crtc->active)
> -			hw->dirty_pipes |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (dev_priv->active_pipes) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-29  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-11 20:09 [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Some cleanup near the SKL wm/ddb area Ville Syrjala
2019-10-11 20:09 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Nuke the useless changed param from skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes() Ville Syrjala
2019-10-16 14:25   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-10-11 20:09 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Nuke 'realloc_pipes' Ville Syrjala
2019-10-16 14:27   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-10-11 20:09 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Make dirty_pipes refer to pipes Ville Syrjala
2019-10-16 14:28   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-10-11 20:09 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Don't set undefined bits in dirty_pipes Ville Syrjala
2019-11-29  9:24   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-11-29  9:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-10-11 20:09 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Streamline skl_commit_modeset_enables() Ville Syrjala
2019-12-03 13:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-10-11 20:09 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Polish WM_LINETIME register stuff Ville Syrjala
2019-10-14 14:56   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2019-12-03 14:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-10-11 20:09 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Move linetime wms into the crtc state Ville Syrjala
2019-10-11 20:09 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Nuke skl wm.dirty_pipes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2019-11-29  9:18   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2019-11-29  9:18     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-10-11 21:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Some cleanup near the SKL wm/ddb area Patchwork
2019-10-14 18:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Some cleanup near the SKL wm/ddb area (rev2) Patchwork
2019-10-15  3:21 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57ea78bd0b81f076b392ff52eea061224114f126.camel@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox