Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex
@ 2021-02-02 15:43 Chris Wilson
  2021-02-02 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Lift marking a lock as used to utils Chris Wilson
  2021-02-02 18:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex Patchwork
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-02 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Thomas Hellström, Chris Wilson

Since we dropped the use of dev->struct_mutex from inside the shrinker,
we no longer include that as part of our fs_reclaim tainting. We can
drop the i915 argument and rebrand it as a generic fs_reclaim tainter.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c   |  3 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 14 --------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.h |  2 --
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c          |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c        |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c            | 13 +++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h            |  2 ++
 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
index 70f798405f7f..6cdff5fc5882 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -86,8 +86,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.lock);
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj))
-		i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(to_i915(obj->base.dev),
-					       &obj->mm.lock);
+		fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(&obj->mm.lock);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index c2dba1cd9532..b64a0788381f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -415,20 +415,6 @@ void i915_gem_driver_unregister__shrinker(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	unregister_shrinker(&i915->mm.shrinker);
 }
 
-void i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
-				    struct mutex *mutex)
-{
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
-		return;
-
-	fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
-
-	mutex_acquire(&mutex->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
-	mutex_release(&mutex->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
-
-	fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
-}
-
 #define obj_to_i915(obj__) to_i915((obj__)->base.dev)
 
 void i915_gem_object_make_unshrinkable(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.h
index b397d7785789..a25754a51ac3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.h
@@ -25,7 +25,5 @@ unsigned long i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 unsigned long i915_gem_shrink_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
 void i915_gem_driver_register__shrinker(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
 void i915_gem_driver_unregister__shrinker(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
-void i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
-				    struct mutex *mutex);
 
 #endif /* __I915_GEM_SHRINKER_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
index 04aa6601e984..d34770ae4c9a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void i915_address_space_init(struct i915_address_space *vm, int subclass)
 	 */
 	mutex_init(&vm->mutex);
 	lockdep_set_subclass(&vm->mutex, subclass);
-	i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(vm->i915, &vm->mutex);
+	fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(&vm->mutex);
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!vm->total);
 	drm_mm_init(&vm->mm, 0, vm->total);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
index c8cf3981ad7f..7638fb2a45f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
@@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ void intel_gt_init_reset(struct intel_gt *gt)
 	 * within the shrinker, we forbid ourselves from performing any
 	 * fs-reclaim or taking related locks during reset.
 	 */
-	i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(gt->i915, &gt->reset.mutex);
+	fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(&gt->reset.mutex);
 
 	/* no GPU until we are ready! */
 	__set_bit(I915_WEDGED, &gt->reset.flags);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
index f9e780dee9de..90c7f0c4838c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
@@ -114,3 +114,16 @@ void set_timer_ms(struct timer_list *t, unsigned long timeout)
 	/* Keep t->expires = 0 reserved to indicate a canceled timer. */
 	mod_timer(t, jiffies + timeout ?: 1);
 }
+
+void fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(struct mutex *mutex)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
+		return;
+
+	fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	mutex_acquire(&mutex->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+	mutex_release(&mutex->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+
+	fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
index abd4dcd9f79c..3f616d00de42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
@@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ static inline int list_is_last_rcu(const struct list_head *list,
 	return READ_ONCE(list->next) == head;
 }
 
+void fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(struct mutex *mutex);
+
 static inline unsigned long msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(const unsigned int m)
 {
 	unsigned long j = msecs_to_jiffies(m);
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Lift marking a lock as used to utils
  2021-02-02 15:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex Chris Wilson
@ 2021-02-02 15:43 ` Chris Wilson
  2021-02-03 10:14   ` Thomas Hellström
  2021-02-02 18:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex Patchwork
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2021-02-02 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Thomas Hellström, Chris Wilson

After calling lock_set_subclass() the lock _must_ be used, or else
lockdep's internal nr_used_locks becomes unbalanced. Extract the little
utility function to i915_utils.c

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 13 +------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c         | 15 +++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h         |  7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
index 56fb9cece71b..f11ea72645ac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -769,18 +769,7 @@ intel_engine_init_active(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, unsigned int subclass)
 
 	spin_lock_init(&engine->active.lock);
 	lockdep_set_subclass(&engine->active.lock, subclass);
-
-	/*
-	 * Due to an interesting quirk in lockdep's internal debug tracking,
-	 * after setting a subclass we must ensure the lock is used. Otherwise,
-	 * nr_unused_locks is incremented once too often.
-	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-	local_irq_disable();
-	lock_map_acquire(&engine->active.lock.dep_map);
-	lock_map_release(&engine->active.lock.dep_map);
-	local_irq_enable();
-#endif
+	mark_lock_used_irq(&engine->active.lock);
 }
 
 static struct intel_context *
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
index 90c7f0c4838c..894de60833ec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
@@ -127,3 +127,18 @@ void fs_reclaim_taints_mutex(struct mutex *mutex)
 
 	fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+void __mark_lock_used_irq(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Due to an interesting quirk in lockdep's internal debug tracking,
+	 * after setting a subclass we must ensure the lock is used. Otherwise,
+	 * nr_unused_locks is incremented once too often.
+	 */
+	local_irq_disable();
+	lock_map_acquire(lock);
+	lock_map_release(lock);
+	local_irq_enable();
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
index 3f616d00de42..610616d6bf29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
@@ -450,6 +450,13 @@ static inline bool timer_expired(const struct timer_list *t)
 	return timer_active(t) && !timer_pending(t);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+void __mark_lock_used_irq(struct lockdep_map *lock);
+#define mark_lock_used_irq(lock) __mark_lock_used_irq(&(lock)->dep_map)
+#else
+#define mark_lock_used_irq(lock)
+#endif
+
 /*
  * This is a lookalike for IS_ENABLED() that takes a kconfig value,
  * e.g. CONFIG_DRM_I915_SPIN_REQUEST, and evaluates whether it is non-zero
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex
  2021-02-02 15:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex Chris Wilson
  2021-02-02 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Lift marking a lock as used to utils Chris Wilson
@ 2021-02-02 18:40 ` Patchwork
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-02-02 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5057 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86587/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9718 -> Patchwork_19561
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19561 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_19561, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/index.html

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19561:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@i915_module_load@reload:
    - fi-kbl-r:           NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/fi-kbl-r/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19561 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@bcs0:
    - fi-kbl-r:           NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109271]) +2 similar issues
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/fi-kbl-r/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@bcs0.html

  * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
    - fi-kbl-r:           NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/fi-kbl-r/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-edid-read:
    - fi-kbl-r:           NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +8 similar issues
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/fi-kbl-r/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-edid-read.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d:
    - fi-kbl-r:           NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/fi-kbl-r/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@basic-read:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-WARN][7] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9718/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_vgem@basic-read.html
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_vgem@basic-read.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_two_bos:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [DMESG-WARN][8] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][9] +1 similar issue
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9718/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_two_bos.html
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_two_bos.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - fi-kbl-r:           [FAIL][10] ([i915#1569] / [i915#192] / [i915#193] / [i915#194] / [i915#2295]) -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2292] / [i915#2426] / [k.org#204565])
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9718/fi-kbl-r/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/fi-kbl-r/igt@runner@aborted.html

  
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827
  [i915#1569]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1569
  [i915#192]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/192
  [i915#193]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/193
  [i915#194]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/194
  [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
  [i915#2292]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2292
  [i915#2295]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2295
  [i915#2426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426
  [i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
  [i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533
  [k.org#204565]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204565


Participating hosts (42 -> 38)
------------------------------

  Missing    (4): fi-jsl-1 fi-bsw-cyan fi-bsw-nick fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_9718 -> Patchwork_19561

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_9718: e123813e002aaa9a6a9d81b0294c93dd1edf9b4f @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5988: 4581082c706498cc3afe20e89fc4836a3fc69105 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_19561: 249a5647a02ecc41e5e605b6fe63658a12a72b87 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

249a5647a02e drm/i915: Lift marking a lock as used to utils
ae8fd4977377 drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19561/index.html

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6102 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Lift marking a lock as used to utils
  2021-02-02 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Lift marking a lock as used to utils Chris Wilson
@ 2021-02-03 10:14   ` Thomas Hellström
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Hellström @ 2021-02-03 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx


On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 15:43 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> After calling lock_set_subclass() the lock _must_ be used, or else
> lockdep's internal nr_used_locks becomes unbalanced. Extract the
> little
> utility function to i915_utils.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-03 10:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-02 15:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Lift marking a lock as used to utils Chris Wilson
2021-02-03 10:14   ` Thomas Hellström
2021-02-02 18:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex Patchwork

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox