From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
<suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dss_regs: Use REG_* macros for the DSS ctl bits
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:06:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6eb3cb54-a8b8-4035-8070-c2e4a507c0dd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZtGqzFZzkn-HoVC4@intel.com>
Thanks Ville for the comments.
Please my response inline:
On 8/30/2024 4:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:39:32AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>> Cleanup register definitions for DSS CLT reg bits.
> DSS_CTL
Will fix this in next version.
>
>> Replace the hand rolled (1<<n) with the modern REG_BIT().
>> Use REG_GENMASK and REG_FIELD_PREP for the bit fields.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h | 34 ++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h
>> index b1e24ea027c3..cfc8ef451917 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h
>> @@ -10,35 +10,37 @@
>>
>> /* Display Stream Splitter Control */
>> #define DSS_CTL1 _MMIO(0x67400)
>> -#define SPLITTER_ENABLE (1 << 31)
>> -#define JOINER_ENABLE (1 << 30)
>> -#define DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE (1 << 24)
>> +#define SPLITTER_ENABLE REG_BIT(31)
>> +#define JOINER_ENABLE REG_BIT(30)
>> +#define DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE REG_BIT(24)
>> #define DUAL_LINK_MODE_FRONTBACK (0 << 24)
> If we want to keep this then we should define the bit as
> DUAL_LINK_MODE_MASK, and then both values should be defined
> via REG_FIELD_PREP().
Makes sense. I will add DUAL_LINK_MODE_MASK and prepare value for
Interleave and frontback.
>
>> -#define OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK (0xf << 16)
>> -#define OVERLAP_PIXELS(pixels) ((pixels) << 16)
>> -#define LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK (0xfff << 0)
>> -#define LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels) ((pixels) << 0)
>> +#define OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 16)
>> +#define OVERLAP_PIXELS(pixels) REG_FIELD_PREP(OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK, pixels)
>> +#define LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK REG_GENMASK(11, 0)
>> +#define LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels) REG_FIELD_PREP(LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK, \
>> + pixels)
> Protect with '(pixels)'
Will take care of this.
>
> The extra line wrap seems pointless.
This was just to make checkpatch happy to avoid long line, but if it
hampers readability I will do away with this.
>
>> #define MAX_DL_BUFFER_TARGET_DEPTH 0x5a0
>>
>> #define DSS_CTL2 _MMIO(0x67404)
>> -#define LEFT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE (1 << 31)
>> -#define RIGHT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE (1 << 15)
>> -#define RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK (0xfff << 0)
>> -#define RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels) ((pixels) << 0)
>> +#define LEFT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE REG_BIT(31)
>> +#define RIGHT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE REG_BIT(15)
>> +#define RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK REG_GENMASK(11, 0)
>> +#define RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels) REG_FIELD_PREP(RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,\
>> + pixels)
> Another unprotected macro argument.
Will fix this in the next version.
Thanks again for the suggestions/comments. I will take care of these in
the next version.
Regards,
Ankit
>
>>
>> #define _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1_PB 0x78200
>> #define _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1_PC 0x78400
>> #define ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe) _MMIO_PIPE((pipe) - PIPE_B, \
>> _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1_PB, \
>> _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1_PC)
>> -#define BIG_JOINER_ENABLE (1 << 29)
>> -#define PRIMARY_BIG_JOINER_ENABLE (1 << 28)
>> -#define VGA_CENTERING_ENABLE (1 << 27)
>> +#define BIG_JOINER_ENABLE REG_BIT(29)
>> +#define PRIMARY_BIG_JOINER_ENABLE REG_BIT(28)
>> +#define VGA_CENTERING_ENABLE REG_BIT(27)
>> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK REG_GENMASK(26, 25)
>> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_2_SEGMENT REG_FIELD_PREP(SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK, 0)
>> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_4_SEGMENT REG_FIELD_PREP(SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK, 1)
>> -#define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_PRIMARY (1 << 21)
>> -#define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_SECONDARY (1 << 20)
>> +#define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_PRIMARY REG_BIT(21)
>> +#define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_SECONDARY REG_BIT(20)
>>
>> #define _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2_PB 0x78204
>> #define _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2_PC 0x78404
>> --
>> 2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-02 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 5:09 [PATCH 00/19] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/display: Move all DSS control registers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dss_regs: Use REG_* macros for the DSS ctl bits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 11:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-02 4:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915/ddi: Move all mso related helpers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/dss: Move to struct intel_display Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Avoid using intel_dsi in configure_dual_link_mode Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Use intel_display " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Move helpers to configure dsi dual link to intel_dss Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 11:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-02 4:51 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Rename helper to check if the pipe supports dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Move all dss stuff in dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/dss: Use struct intel_display in dss dsc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/display: Move dss stuff in intel_dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/display: Rename static functions that use joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/display: Separate out joiner stuff in a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask to intel_joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/display: Move helpers for primary joiner " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/joiner: Use struct intel_display in intel_joiner_enabled_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/joiner: Use struct intel_display in intel_joiner_supported_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files (rev3) Patchwork
2024-08-30 5:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 6:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-01 0:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-29 13:18 [PATCH 00/19] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dss_regs: Use REG_* macros for the DSS ctl bits Ankit Nautiyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6eb3cb54-a8b8-4035-8070-c2e4a507c0dd@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox