From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dss_regs: Use REG_* macros for the DSS ctl bits
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:19:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtGqzFZzkn-HoVC4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830050950.2528450-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:39:32AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Cleanup register definitions for DSS CLT reg bits.
DSS_CTL
> Replace the hand rolled (1<<n) with the modern REG_BIT().
> Use REG_GENMASK and REG_FIELD_PREP for the bit fields.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h | 34 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h
> index b1e24ea027c3..cfc8ef451917 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss_regs.h
> @@ -10,35 +10,37 @@
>
> /* Display Stream Splitter Control */
> #define DSS_CTL1 _MMIO(0x67400)
> -#define SPLITTER_ENABLE (1 << 31)
> -#define JOINER_ENABLE (1 << 30)
> -#define DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE (1 << 24)
> +#define SPLITTER_ENABLE REG_BIT(31)
> +#define JOINER_ENABLE REG_BIT(30)
> +#define DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE REG_BIT(24)
> #define DUAL_LINK_MODE_FRONTBACK (0 << 24)
If we want to keep this then we should define the bit as
DUAL_LINK_MODE_MASK, and then both values should be defined
via REG_FIELD_PREP().
> -#define OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK (0xf << 16)
> -#define OVERLAP_PIXELS(pixels) ((pixels) << 16)
> -#define LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK (0xfff << 0)
> -#define LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels) ((pixels) << 0)
> +#define OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 16)
> +#define OVERLAP_PIXELS(pixels) REG_FIELD_PREP(OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK, pixels)
> +#define LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK REG_GENMASK(11, 0)
> +#define LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels) REG_FIELD_PREP(LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK, \
> + pixels)
Protect with '(pixels)'
The extra line wrap seems pointless.
> #define MAX_DL_BUFFER_TARGET_DEPTH 0x5a0
>
> #define DSS_CTL2 _MMIO(0x67404)
> -#define LEFT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE (1 << 31)
> -#define RIGHT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE (1 << 15)
> -#define RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK (0xfff << 0)
> -#define RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels) ((pixels) << 0)
> +#define LEFT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE REG_BIT(31)
> +#define RIGHT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE REG_BIT(15)
> +#define RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK REG_GENMASK(11, 0)
> +#define RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels) REG_FIELD_PREP(RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,\
> + pixels)
Another unprotected macro argument.
>
> #define _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1_PB 0x78200
> #define _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1_PC 0x78400
> #define ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe) _MMIO_PIPE((pipe) - PIPE_B, \
> _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1_PB, \
> _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1_PC)
> -#define BIG_JOINER_ENABLE (1 << 29)
> -#define PRIMARY_BIG_JOINER_ENABLE (1 << 28)
> -#define VGA_CENTERING_ENABLE (1 << 27)
> +#define BIG_JOINER_ENABLE REG_BIT(29)
> +#define PRIMARY_BIG_JOINER_ENABLE REG_BIT(28)
> +#define VGA_CENTERING_ENABLE REG_BIT(27)
> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK REG_GENMASK(26, 25)
> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_2_SEGMENT REG_FIELD_PREP(SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK, 0)
> #define SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_4_SEGMENT REG_FIELD_PREP(SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK, 1)
> -#define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_PRIMARY (1 << 21)
> -#define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_SECONDARY (1 << 20)
> +#define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_PRIMARY REG_BIT(21)
> +#define UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_SECONDARY REG_BIT(20)
>
> #define _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2_PB 0x78204
> #define _ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2_PC 0x78404
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 5:09 [PATCH 00/19] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/display: Move all DSS control registers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dss_regs: Use REG_* macros for the DSS ctl bits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 11:19 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-02 4:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915/ddi: Move all mso related helpers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/dss: Move to struct intel_display Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Avoid using intel_dsi in configure_dual_link_mode Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Use intel_display " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Move helpers to configure dsi dual link to intel_dss Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 11:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-02 4:51 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Rename helper to check if the pipe supports dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Move all dss stuff in dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/dss: Use struct intel_display in dss dsc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/display: Move dss stuff in intel_dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/display: Rename static functions that use joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/display: Separate out joiner stuff in a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask to intel_joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/display: Move helpers for primary joiner " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/joiner: Use struct intel_display in intel_joiner_enabled_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/joiner: Use struct intel_display in intel_joiner_supported_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files (rev3) Patchwork
2024-08-30 5:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 6:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-01 0:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-29 13:18 [PATCH 00/19] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dss_regs: Use REG_* macros for the DSS ctl bits Ankit Nautiyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZtGqzFZzkn-HoVC4@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox