From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tursulin@ursulin.net>
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Handle RC6 counter wrap
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 14:31:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70c6d804-7f2d-e220-f52d-17062d137710@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180208140622.GB5453@intel.com>
On 08/02/2018 14:06, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 08:18:42AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> We can implement limited RC6 counter wrap-around protection under the
>> assumption that clients will be reading this value more frequently than
>> the wrap period on a given platform.
>>
>> With the typical wrap-around period being ~90 minutes, even with the
>> exception of Baytrail which wraps every 13 seconds, this sounds like a
>> reasonable assumption.
>>
>> Implementation works by storing a 64-bit software copy of a hardware RC6
>> counter, along with the previous HW counter snapshot. This enables it to
>> detect wrap is polled frequently enough and keep the software copy
>> monotonically incrementing.
>>
>> v2:
>> * Missed GEN6_GT_GFX_RC6_LOCKED when considering slot sizing and
>> indexing.
>> * Fixed off-by-one in wrap-around handling. (Chris Wilson)
>>
>> v3:
>> * Simplify index checking by using unsigned int. (Chris Wilson)
>> * Expand the comment to explain why indexing works.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94852
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index ad1fc845cd1b..28a2671a26c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -946,6 +946,8 @@ struct intel_rps {
>>
>> struct intel_rc6 {
>> bool enabled;
>> + u64 prev_hw_residency[4];
>> + u64 cur_residency[4];
>> };
>>
>> struct intel_llc_pstate {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index 41f26ab46501..063c885175e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -9417,15 +9417,16 @@ static u64 vlv_residency_raw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> const i915_reg_t reg)
>> {
>> u32 lower, upper, tmp;
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> int loop = 2;
>>
>> - /* The register accessed do not need forcewake. We borrow
>> + /*
>> + * The register accessed do not need forcewake. We borrow
>> * uncore lock to prevent concurrent access to range reg.
>> */
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, flags);
>> + lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
>>
>> - /* vlv and chv residency counters are 40 bits in width.
>> + /*
>> + * vlv and chv residency counters are 40 bits in width.
>> * With a control bit, we can choose between upper or lower
>> * 32bit window into this counter.
>> *
>> @@ -9449,29 +9450,49 @@ static u64 vlv_residency_raw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> upper = I915_READ_FW(reg);
>> } while (upper != tmp && --loop);
>>
>> - /* Everywhere else we always use VLV_COUNTER_CONTROL with the
>> + /*
>> + * Everywhere else we always use VLV_COUNTER_CONTROL with the
>> * VLV_COUNT_RANGE_HIGH bit set - so it is safe to leave it set
>> * now.
>> */
>>
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, flags);
>> -
>> return lower | (u64)upper << 8;
>> }
>>
>> u64 intel_rc6_residency_ns(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> const i915_reg_t reg)
>> {
>> - u64 time_hw;
>> + u64 time_hw, prev_hw, overflow_hw;
>> + unsigned int fw_domains;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + unsigned int i;
>> u32 mul, div;
>>
>> if (!HAS_RC6(dev_priv))
>> return 0;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Store previous hw counter values for counter wrap-around handling.
>> + *
>> + * There are only four interesting registers and they live next to each
>> + * other so we can use the relative address, compared to the smallest
>> + * one as the index into driver storage.
>> + */
>> + i = (i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg) -
>> + i915_mmio_reg_offset(GEN6_GT_GFX_RC6_LOCKED)) / sizeof(u32);
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(dev_priv->gt_pm.rc6.cur_residency)))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + fw_domains = intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv, reg, FW_REG_READ);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, flags);
>> + intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
>> +
>> /* On VLV and CHV, residency time is in CZ units rather than 1.28us */
>> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>> mul = 1000000;
>> div = dev_priv->czclk_freq;
>> + overflow_hw = BIT_ULL(40);
>> time_hw = vlv_residency_raw(dev_priv, reg);
>> } else {
>> /* 833.33ns units on Gen9LP, 1.28us elsewhere. */
>> @@ -9483,9 +9504,32 @@ u64 intel_rc6_residency_ns(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> div = 1;
>> }
>>
>> - time_hw = I915_READ(reg);
>> + overflow_hw = BIT_ULL(32);
>> + time_hw = I915_READ_FW(reg);
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Counter wrap handling.
>> + *
>> + * But relying on a sufficient frequency of queries otherwise counters
>> + * can still wrap.
>> + */
>> + prev_hw = dev_priv->gt_pm.rc6.prev_hw_residency[i];
>> + dev_priv->gt_pm.rc6.prev_hw_residency[i] = time_hw;
>> +
>> + /* RC6 delta from last sample. */
>> + if (time_hw >= prev_hw)
>> + time_hw -= prev_hw;
>> + else
>> + time_hw += overflow_hw - prev_hw;
>> +
>> + /* Add delta to RC6 extended raw driver copy. */
>> + time_hw += dev_priv->gt_pm.rc6.cur_residency[i];
>> + dev_priv->gt_pm.rc6.cur_residency[i] = time_hw;
>> +
>> + intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, flags);
>> +
>> return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(time_hw * mul, div);
>
> What happens when time_hw*mul+div-1 overflows?
It overflows. :I
Apart on Valleyview multipler is 14 bits max, so we still get 64 - 14 -
1 = 49 bits of software stored RC6 before it happens. Given that the
info if 32-bits is 50 minutes or so, 49 bits sounds good enough.
On Valleyview multiplier is 20 bits so 64 - 20 - 1 = 43 bits before
overflow. A bit less than above, and I am not sure what the 40-bit hw
counter overflow period is there to start with? Is 8 times that enough?
Or not?
Suggestions?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-08 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <151807682017.28809.17040553218386245341@mail.alporthouse.com151807682017.28809.17040553218386245341@mail.alporthouse.com>
2018-02-08 8:18 ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Handle RC6 counter wrap Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-08 14:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-02-08 14:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-02-08 14:44 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-08 15:46 ` [PATCH v4] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-08 15:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-08 15:51 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-08 16:00 ` [PATCH v5] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-08 16:04 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-13 14:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-13 15:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-02-08 9:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Handle RC6 counter wrap (rev3) Patchwork
2018-02-08 12:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-02-08 16:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Handle RC6 counter wrap (rev4) Patchwork
2018-02-08 16:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Handle RC6 counter wrap (rev5) Patchwork
2018-02-13 16:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-08 23:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70c6d804-7f2d-e220-f52d-17062d137710@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox