Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Cheng <michael.cheng@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: lucas.demarchi@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm: Add arch arm64 for drm_clflush_virt_range
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:52:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <718c6339-4a19-0de0-2666-a32be7c56dd7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <011a236d-7ed4-0d48-e8a6-c9bd98740d5b@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2578 bytes --]

Hi Tvrtko,

It seems without cacheflush.h being included, when I build for arm64 or 
x86, it stills pulls in cacheflush.h:

./.drm_cache.o.cmd:838: include/linux/cacheflush.h \
./.drm_cache.o.cmd:839: arch/x86/include/asm/cacheflush.h \
./.drm_cache.o.cmd:920: include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h \
./.drm_cache.o.cmd:830: include/linux/cacheflush.h \
./.drm_cache.o.cmd:831: arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h \
./.drm_cache.o.cmd:1085: include/asm-generic/cacheflush.h \
So it seems without including it, cacheflush.h stills get pulled in,
I think its because its a required kernel source to build the kernel
per specific architecture, but please correct if I am wrong,as I am still
trying to understand how things works!
Michael Cheng
On 2022-02-25 8:28 a.m., Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 25/02/2022 03:24, Michael Cheng wrote:
>> Add arm64 support for drm_clflush_virt_range. caches_clean_inval_pou
>> performs a flush by first performing a clean, follow by an invalidation
>> operation.
>>
>> v2 (Michael Cheng): Use correct macro for cleaning and invalidation the
>>             dcache. Thanks Tvrtko for the suggestion.
>>
>> v3 (Michael Cheng): Replace asm/cacheflush.h with linux/cacheflush.h
>>
>> v4 (Michael Cheng): Arm64 does not export dcache_clean_inval_poc as a
>>             symbol that could be use by other modules, thus use
>>             caches_clean_inval_pou instead. Also this version
>>                 removes include for cacheflush, since its already
>>             included base on architecture type.
>
> What does it mean that it is included based on architecture type? Some 
> of the other header already pulls it in?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Cheng <michael.cheng@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
>> index c3e6e615bf09..81c28714f930 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
>> @@ -174,6 +174,11 @@ drm_clflush_virt_range(void *addr, unsigned long 
>> length)
>>         if (wbinvd_on_all_cpus())
>>           pr_err("Timed out waiting for cache flush\n");
>> +
>> +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
>> +    void *end = addr + length;
>> +    caches_clean_inval_pou((unsigned long)addr, (unsigned long)end);
>> +
>>   #else
>>       WARN_ONCE(1, "Architecture has no drm_cache.c support\n");
>>   #endif

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7847 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25  3:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 0/6] Use drm_clflush* instead of clflush Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm: Add arch arm64 for drm_clflush_virt_range Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 16:28   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 16:52     ` Michael Cheng [this message]
2022-02-25 17:33       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 17:40         ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 18:19           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 18:23             ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 18:42               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 18:58                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-25 18:24   ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-25 19:27     ` Michael Cheng
2022-03-02 12:49       ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-02 15:55         ` Michael Cheng
2022-03-02 17:06           ` Alex Deucher
2022-03-02 19:10           ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-07 16:52             ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 2/6] drm/i915/gt: Re-work intel_write_status_page Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 3/6] drm/i915/gt: Drop invalidate_csb_entries Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 4/6] drm/i915/gt: Re-work reset_csb Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 5/6] drm/i915/: Re-work clflush_write32 Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 6/6] drm/i915/gt: replace cache_clflush_range Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  7:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Use drm_clflush* instead of clflush Patchwork
2022-02-25  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-25  7:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-26  1:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=718c6339-4a19-0de0-2666-a32be7c56dd7@intel.com \
    --to=michael.cheng@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox