From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH igt 1/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:18:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7db9c1be-ee2d-c15d-c6f2-b280af17e4e4@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171222110323.21230-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 22/12/2017 11:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Sleep for a known duration. In particular, CI once saw a measurement for
> busyness greater than the intended batch_duration!
>
> v2: Go back to starting pmu sampling outside of spinner; the GPU should
> be idle.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104241
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index db7696115..38fd05dc9 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void pmu_read_multi(int fd, unsigned int num, uint64_t *val)
> igt_assert_f((double)(x) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(ref) && \
> (double)(x) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(ref), \
> "'%s' != '%s' (%f not within %f%% tolerance of %f)\n",\
> - #x, #ref, (double)(x), (tolerance) * 100.0, (double)ref)
> + #x, #ref, (double)(x), (tolerance) * 100.0, (double)(ref))
>
> /*
> * Helper for cases where we assert on time spent sleeping (directly or
> @@ -133,30 +133,28 @@ static unsigned int e2ring(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> static void
> single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, bool busy)
> {
> - double ref = busy ? batch_duration_ns : 0.0f;
> + unsigned long slept;
> igt_spin_t *spin;
> uint64_t val;
> int fd;
>
> fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance));
>
> - if (busy) {
> + if (busy)
> spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
> - igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, batch_duration_ns);
> - } else {
> - usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
> - }
> + else
> + spin = NULL;
>
> - if (busy)
> - gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
> + slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
> + igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
>
> val = pmu_read_single(fd);
>
> - if (busy)
> - igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
> + igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
> close(fd);
>
> - assert_within_epsilon(val, ref, tolerance);
> + assert_within_epsilon(val, busy ? slept : 0.f, tolerance);
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
> }
>
> static void log_busy(int fd, unsigned int num_engines, uint64_t *val)
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-22 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-22 11:03 [PATCH igt 1/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 2/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten measurements for most-busy Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 3/5] igt/perf_pmu: Measure the reference batch for busy-check-all Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 4/5] igt/perf_pmu: Measure the reference batch for all-busy-check-all Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 5/5] igt/perf_pmu: Speed up frequency measurement Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 12:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement Patchwork
2017-12-22 13:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2017-12-22 13:49 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7db9c1be-ee2d-c15d-c6f2-b280af17e4e4@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox